Literature DB >> 35707554

Competing risks model for clustered data based on the subdistribution hazards with spatial random effects.

Somayeh Momenyan1, Farzane Ahmadi2, Jalal Poorolajal3.   

Abstract

In some applications, the clustered survival data are arranged spatially such as clinical centers or geographical regions. Incorporating spatial variation in these data not only can improve the accuracy and efficiency of the parameter estimation, but it also investigates the spatial patterns of survivorship for identifying high-risk areas. Competing risks in survival data concern a situation where there is more than one cause of failure, but only the occurrence of the first one is observable. In this paper, we considered Bayesian subdistribution hazard regression models with spatial random effects for the clustered HIV/AIDS data. An intrinsic conditional autoregressive (ICAR) distribution was employed to model the areal spatial random effects. Comparison among competing models was performed by the deviance information criterion. We illustrated the gains of our model through application to the HIV/AIDS data and the simulation studies.
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Competing risks; Markov chain Monte Carlo; cumulative incidence function; spatial random effect; subdistribution hazard

Year:  2021        PMID: 35707554      PMCID: PMC9041729          DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1884208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Stat        ISSN: 0266-4763            Impact factor:   1.416


  22 in total

1.  Frailty modeling for spatially correlated survival data, with application to infant mortality in Minnesota.

Authors:  Sudipto Banerjee; Melanie M Wall; Bradley P Carlin
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Regression modeling of semicompeting risks data.

Authors:  Limin Peng; Jason P Fine
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A flexible parametric approach to examining spatial variation in relative survival.

Authors:  Susanna M Cramb; Kerrie L Mengersen; Paul C Lambert; Louise M Ryan; Peter D Baade
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Estimating and testing for center effects in competing risks.

Authors:  Sandrine Katsahian; Christian Boudreau
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality.

Authors:  J W Vaupel; K G Manton; E Stallard
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1979-08

6.  Frailty-based competing risks model for multivariate survival data.

Authors:  Malka Gorfine; Li Hsu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  SemiCompRisks: An R Package for the Analysis of Independent and Cluster-correlated Semi-competing Risks Data.

Authors:  Danilo Alvares; Sebastien Haneuse; Catherine Lee; Kyu Ha Lee
Journal:  R J       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.984

8.  Competing risks regression for stratified data.

Authors:  Bingqing Zhou; Aurelien Latouche; Vanderson Rocha; Jason Fine
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Parametric models for spatially correlated survival data for individuals with multiple cancers.

Authors:  Ulysses Diva; Dipak K Dey; Sudipto Banerjee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Competing risks analyses: objectives and approaches.

Authors:  Marcel Wolbers; Michael T Koller; Vianda S Stel; Beat Schaer; Kitty J Jager; Karen Leffondré; Georg Heinze
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.