Literature DB >> 21603376

The accuracy of intraoperative subareolar frozen section in nipple-sparing mastectomies.

Daniel Luo, Jennifer Ha, Bruce Latham, David Ingram, Tony Connell, Diana Hastrich, Weng-Chan Yeow, Peter Willsher, Joseph Luo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative subareolar frozen sections are used to assess the nipple areolar complex's suitability for preservation for patients selected for nipple-sparing mastectomy. We aim to investigate the accuracy and value of the frozen section compared to formal histopathologic results.
METHODS: In our 5-year retrospective study, 52 candidates for nipple-sparing mastectomies had subareolar frozen sections analyzed intraoperatively for malignant or atypical duct changes. Women were considered for nipple-sparing mastectomy if their primary breast malignancy was greater than 3 cm from the nipple-areolar complex and not multifocal in nature. Frozen-section results were compared to the formal histopathologic results, allowing analysis of the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. Causes of false negatives (negative frozen-section findings, positive histopathology findings) were then examined.
RESULTS: Of 52 frozen sections, 47 (90%) yielded negative results and 5 (10%) yielded positive results. Of the 47 negative results, 39 were true negatives while 8 were false negatives. Of the 5 positive results, all were true positives with no false positives. Therefore, the positive predictive value of subareolar frozen section is 100%, negative predictive value 83%, sensitivity 38%, and specificity 100%. Of the 8 false negatives, 4 (50%) were due to sampling errors, 3 (37.5%) were due to interpretation errors, and 1 (12.5%) was due to diathermy artifact.
CONCLUSION: Intraoperative subareolar frozen section is a specific but nonsensitive test. It is useful in nipple-sparing mastectomy because in 10% of cases a positive result allows immediate nipple and areolar excision. Its low sensitivity and negative predictive value means that 15% of patients will need a subsequent nipple and areolar excision. Eighty-five percent of patients can, however, have a single-stage excision.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; frozen section; intraoperative; nipple-sparing mastectomy; skin-sparing mastectomy

Year:  2010        PMID: 21603376      PMCID: PMC3096209     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ochsner J        ISSN: 1524-5012


  13 in total

Review 1.  Skin-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Giles H Cunnick; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Surgical procedures after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: results of the GEPARDUO trial.

Authors:  Sibylle Loibl; Gunter von Minckwitz; Günther Raab; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Serban Dan Costa; Bernd Gerber; Holger Eidtmann; Simone Petrich; Jörn Hilfrich; Christian Jackisch; Andreas du Bois; Manfred Kaufmann
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-09-17       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved?

Authors:  Rache M Simmons; Meghan Brennan; Paul Christos; Valencia King; Michael Osborne
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: incidence of recurrence in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  N Fersis; A Hoenig; K Relakis; S Pinis; D Wallwiener
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem?

Authors:  Virgilio Sacchini; José A Pinotti; Alfredo C S D Barros; Alberto Luini; Alfonso Pluchinotta; Marianne Pinotti; Marcelo G Boratto; Marco D Ricci; Carlos A Ruiz; Antonio C Nisida; Paolo Veronesi; Jean Petit; Paolo Arnone; Fabio Bassi; Joseph J Disa; Carlos A Garcia-Etienne; Patrick I Borgen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure.

Authors:  Bernd Gerber; Annette Krause; Toralf Reimer; Heiner Müller; Ingrid Küchenmeister; Joseph Makovitzky; Günther Kundt; Klaus Friese
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures.

Authors:  Joseph P Crowe; Julian A Kim; Randall Yetman; Jillian Banbury; Rebecca J Patrick; Deborah Baynes
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-02

8.  Development and validation of a model predictive of occult nipple involvement in women undergoing mastectomy.

Authors:  J E Rusby; E F Brachtel; M Othus; J S Michaelson; F C Koerner; B L Smith
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Neoplastic involvement of nipple and skin flap in carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  U Wertheim; L Ozzello
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens.

Authors:  Elena F Brachtel; Jennifer E Rusby; James S Michaelson; L Leon Chen; Alona Muzikansky; Barbara L Smith; Frederick C Koerner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies?

Authors:  Nicola Rocco; Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Implant Reconstruction in Nipple Sparing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Carrie K Chu; Matthew J Davis; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Sebastian J Winocour; Albert Losken; Grant W Carlson
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy for early breast cancer: the importance of intraoperative evaluation of retroareolar margins and intra-nipple duct removal.

Authors:  Rebeca Neves Heinzen; Alfredo Carlos Simões Dornellas de Barros; Filomena Marino Carvalho; Fernando Nalesso Aguiar; Cristiane da Costa Bandeira Abrahão Nimir; Alfredo Luiz Jacomo
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-06

4.  Feasibility of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients with Tumor-Nipple Distance Less Than 2.0 cm.

Authors:  Jai Min Ryu; Seok Jin Nam; Seok Won Kim; Se Kyung Lee; Soo Youn Bae; Ha Woo Yi; Sungmin Park; Hyun-June Paik; Jeong Eon Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Systematic review of therapeutic nipple-sparing versus skin-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  R A Agha; Y Al Omran; G Wellstead; H Sagoo; I Barai; S Rajmohan; M R Borrelli; M Vella-Baldacchino; D P Orgill; J E Rusby
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-12-19

Review 6.  The Oncological Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with a Pooled Analysis of 12,358 Procedures.

Authors:  Hannah Louise Headon; Abdul Kasem; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2016-07-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.