Literature DB >> 21600544

Prognostic value of serial global longitudinal strain measured by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Jong Shin Woo1, Woo-Shik Kim, Tae-Kyung Yu, Sang Jin Ha, Seok Yeon Kim, Jong-Hoa Bae, Kwon Sam Kim.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether assessment of global longitudinal strain (GLS) before revascularization could predict adverse cardiac events after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In addition, the relation between GLS and cardiac biomarkers was investigated. From July 2006 through December 2009, 98 patients with first STEMI underwent conventional and speckle tracking echocardiography at initial presentation and 3 days after primary coronary intervention. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to percent changes of GLS compared to baseline GLS values: group 1, improved GLS >10%; group 2, unchanged GLS from -10% to 10%; and group 3, decreased GLS <-10%. Subsequent complications including all-cause mortality and readmission because of congestive heart failure during a 6-month period of follow-up were prospectively evaluated. After coronary intervention, GLS was improved in 29 patients (30%, group 1), unchanged in 55 patients (56%, group 2), and worsened in 14 patients (14%, group 3). Complications developed in 7 patients (group 1, n = 0, 0%; group 2, n = 2, 28%; group 3, n = 5, 72%, p <0.01). Multivariate Cox analysis showed an independent association of GLS before and after coronary intervention with subsequent complications. Significant correlations were observed between GLS and cardiac biomarkers. In conclusion, GLS assessment before coronary intervention was a good predictor of complications in patients with STEMI comparable to predictions using GLS after intervention at 6-month follow-up.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21600544     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  20 in total

Review 1.  Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular systolic function: from ejection fraction to torsion.

Authors:  Matteo Cameli; Sergio Mondillo; Marco Solari; Francesca Maria Righini; Valentina Andrei; Carla Contaldi; Eugenia De Marco; Michele Di Mauro; Roberta Esposito; Sabina Gallina; Roberta Montisci; Andrea Rossi; Maurizio Galderisi; Stefano Nistri; Eustachio Agricola; Donato Mele
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Longitudinal and circumferential strain in patients with regional LV dysfunction.

Authors:  Manish Bansal; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Optimisation of coronary vascular territorial 3D echocardiographic strain imaging using computed tomography: a feasibility study using image fusion.

Authors:  Martina Chantal de Knegt; A Fuchs; P Weeke; R Møgelvang; C Hassager; K F Kofoed
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Sensitive cardiac troponins and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in stable coronary artery disease: correlation with left ventricular function as assessed by myocardial strain.

Authors:  Marit Kristine Smedsrud; Jørgen Gravning; Torbjørn Omland; Christian Eek; Lars Mørkrid; Helge Skulstad; Lars Aaberge; Bjørn Bendz; John Kjekshus; Thor Edvardsen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Left ventricular mechanical function: clinical correlates, heritability, and association with parental heart failure.

Authors:  Susan Cheng; Elizabeth L McCabe; Martin G Larson; Ming-Huei Chen; Ewa Osypiuk; Birgitta T Lehman; Plamen Stantchev; Jayashri Aragam; Scott D Solomon; Emelia J Benjamin; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 15.534

6.  Left ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain predicts adverse remodeling and subsequent cardiac events in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Juan Lacalzada; Alejandro de la Rosa; María Manuela Izquierdo; Juan José Jiménez; José Luis Iribarren; Martín Jesús García-González; Belén Marí López; María Amelia Duque; Antonio Barragán; Celestino Hernández; María Carrillo-Pérez; Ignacio Laynez
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Age- and sex-based reference limits and clinical correlates of myocardial strain and synchrony: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Susan Cheng; Martin G Larson; Elizabeth L McCabe; Ewa Osypiuk; Birgitta T Lehman; Plamen Stanchev; Jayashri Aragam; Emelia J Benjamin; Scott D Solomon; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  Global myocardial strain assessment by different imaging modalities to predict outcomes after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A systematic review.

Authors:  Abhishek Shetye; Sheraz A Nazir; Iain B Squire; Gerald P McCann
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-26

9.  Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of multilayer cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking derived longitudinal and circumferential strain.

Authors:  Saikrishna Ananthapadmanabhan; Echo Deng; Giuseppe Femia; Simon Tang; Eng-Siew Koh; Andreas Schuster; Raj Puranik; Pankaj Gupta; Tuan Nguyen; Hany Dimitri; James Otton
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-04

10.  Non-Invasive Evaluation of Heart Function with Four-Dimensional Echocardiography.

Authors:  Ran Chen; Meihua Zhu; David J Sahn; Muhammad Ashraf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.