Literature DB >> 32420097

Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of multilayer cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking derived longitudinal and circumferential strain.

Saikrishna Ananthapadmanabhan1, Echo Deng1, Giuseppe Femia2, Simon Tang2, Eng-Siew Koh3, Andreas Schuster4,5,6, Raj Puranik7, Pankaj Gupta7, Tuan Nguyen1,2, Hany Dimitri1,2, James Otton1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multilayer strain measurement with cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) allows independent assessment of endocardial and epicardial strain. This novel method of layer-specific quantification of myocardial deformation parameters provides greater insight into contractility compared to whole-layer strain analysis. The clinical utility of this technique is promising. The aim of this study is to investigate the intra- and inter- observer reproducibility of CMR-FT derived multilayer global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global circumferential strain (GCS) parameters in the setting of normal cardiac function, cardiac pathology, and differing MRI field strengths.
METHODS: We studied 4 groups of 20 subjects, comprising of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, ischemic heart disease, and patients without cardiac pathology at both 1.5 and 3 T. Quantitative measures of whole-layer and multi-layer longitudinal and circumferential strain were calculated using CMR-FT software.
RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for intraobserver reproducibility of endocardial, epicardial, and whole-layer measurements of GLS were 0.979, 0.980, and 0.978 respectively, and those for GCS were 0.986, 0.977, and 0.985. ICCs for inter-observer reproducibility of endocardial, epicardial, and whole-layer measurements of GLS were 0.976, 0.970, and 0.976, and those for GCS were 0.982, 0.969, and 0.981. Bland Altman analysis showed minimal bias and acceptable limits of agreement (LOA) within each patient subgroup and the overall cohort. Circumferential and longitudinal strain parameters were equally reproducible in the overall cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: CMR-FT derived multilayer measurements of longitudinal and circumferential strain demonstrate high intra- and inter- observer reproducibility, with suitability for use in clinical practice. 2020 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR); feature tracking (FT); multilayer; reproducibility

Year:  2020        PMID: 32420097      PMCID: PMC7225436          DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2020.01.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2223-3652


  27 in total

Review 1.  Tissue Tracking Technology for Assessing Cardiac Mechanics: Principles, Normal Values, and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Piet Claus; Alaa Mabrouk Salem Omar; Gianni Pedrizzetti; Partho P Sengupta; Eike Nagel
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-12

2.  Advanced speckle tracking echocardiography allowing a three-myocardial layer-specific analysis of deformation parameters.

Authors:  Umar Adamu; Fabian Schmitz; Michael Becker; Malte Kelm; Rainer Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2008-09-18

3.  Layer-Specific Segmental Longitudinal Strain Measurements: Capability of Detecting Myocardial Scar and Differences in Feasibility, Accuracy, and Reproducibility, Among Four Vendors A Report From the EACVI-ASE Strain Standardization Task Force.

Authors:  Serkan Ünlü; Oana Mirea; Efstathios D Pagourelias; Jürgen Duchenne; Stéphanie Bézy; Jan Bogaert; James D Thomas; Luigi P Badano; Jens-Uwe Voigt
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Layer-specific analysis of myocardial deformation for assessment of infarct transmurality: comparison of strain-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance with 2D speckle tracking echocardiography.

Authors:  Ertunc Altiok; Mirja Neizel; Sonja Tiemann; Vitali Krass; Michael Becker; Christian Zwicker; Ralf Koos; Malte Kelm; Nils Kraemer; Felix Schoth; Nikolaus Marx; Rainer Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking for strain calculation with harmonic phase imaging analysis.

Authors:  Kan N Hor; William M Gottliebson; Christopher Carson; Erin Wash; James Cnota; Robert Fleck; Janaka Wansapura; Piotr Klimeczek; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Eugene S Chung; D Woodrow Benson; Wojciech Mazur
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02

6.  Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking and tagging for the assessment of left ventricular systolic strain in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jamal N Khan; Anvesha Singh; Sheraz A Nazir; Prathap Kanagala; Anthony H Gershlick; Gerry P McCann
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature-tracking assessment of myocardial mechanics: Intervendor agreement and considerations regarding reproducibility.

Authors:  A Schuster; V-C Stahnke; C Unterberg-Buchwald; J T Kowallick; P Lamata; M Steinmetz; S Kutty; M Fasshauer; W Staab; J M Sohns; B Bigalke; C Ritter; G Hasenfuß; P Beerbaum; J Lotz
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Prediction of Left Ventricular Remodeling after a Myocardial Infarction: Role of Myocardial Deformation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Olivier Huttin; Stefano Coiro; Christine Selton-Suty; Yves Juillière; Erwan Donal; Julien Magne; Nicolas Sadoul; Faiez Zannad; Patrick Rossignol; Nicolas Girerd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Inter-vendor reproducibility of left and right ventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature-tracking.

Authors:  Roman Johannes Gertz; Torben Lange; Johannes Tammo Kowallick; Sören Jan Backhaus; Michael Steinmetz; Wieland Staab; Shelby Kutty; Gerd Hasenfuß; Joachim Lotz; Andreas Schuster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Global and regional left ventricular myocardial deformation measures by magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy volunteers: comparison with tagging and relevance of gender.

Authors:  Daniel Augustine; Adam J Lewandowski; Merzaka Lazdam; Aitzaz Rai; Jane Francis; Saul Myerson; Alison Noble; Harald Becher; Stefan Neubauer; Steffen E Petersen; Paul Leeson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular Imaging in Cardio-Oncology: The Role of Echocardiography and Cardiac MRI in Modern Cardio-Oncology.

Authors:  John Alan Gambril; Aaron Chum; Akash Goyal; Patrick Ruz; Katarzyna Mikrut; Orlando Simonetti; Hardeep Dholiya; Brijesh Patel; Daniel Addison
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.828

2.  Tissue-tracking in the assessment of late gadolinium enhancement in myocarditis and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Sara Doimo; Fabrizio Ricci; Nay Aung; Jackie Cooper; Redha Boubertakh; Mihir M Sanghvi; Gianfranco Sinagra; Steffen E Petersen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.130

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.