Literature DB >> 21598040

Wide, short bore magnetic resonance at 1.5 t: reducing the failure rate in claustrophobic patients.

C H Hunt1, C P Wood, J I Lane, B D Bolster, M A Bernstein, R J Witte.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Claustrophobic reactions in patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have a significant impact on the workflow, patient acceptance and ultimately the costs involved in obtaining a diagnostic scan. The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of a wide, short bore MRI scanner could reduce the need for general anesthesia assistance in these cases.
METHODS: Between September 2006 and March 2008, all patients for whom MRI examinations of the head and/or spine were canceled or prematurely terminated due to claustrophobia on a standard 60 cm bore, 1.5 T scanner were scheduled to be re-scanned on a 70 cm wide bore, 1.25 m long 1.5 T scanner. This re-scanning attempt was made 2 or more days prior to a scheduled anesthesia-assisted MRI appointment. If the patient successfully completed the wide bore MRI examination then the anesthesia-assisted MRI appointment was canceled.
RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were included in this study. The examinations included individual body regions as well as combination examinations (head and cervical spine, entire spine etc.). A total of 72 body regions were examined in 56 patients. Of these regions, 65 (90%) were completed successfully, 50 patients (89%) successfully completed a diagnostic examination on the 70 cm scanner and 6 patients (11%), all of whom were scheduled for examinations which included the head, were unable to complete the examination on the wide bore scanner.
CONCLUSIONS: A 1.5 T wide short bore scanner increases the examination success rate in patients with claustrophobia and substantially reduces the need for anesthesia-assisted MRI examinations even when claustrophobia is severe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21598040     DOI: 10.1007/s00062-011-0075-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1869-1439            Impact factor:   3.649


  11 in total

1.  Anxiety and panic during magnetic resonance scans.

Authors:  S C Brennan; W H Redd; P B Jacobsen; O Schorr; R T Heelan; G K Sze; G Krol; B E Peters; J K Morrissey
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-08-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  MR imaging of claustrophobic patients in an open 1.0T scanner: motion artifacts and patient acceptability compared with closed bore magnets.

Authors:  Christopher Bangard; Jennifer Paszek; Frank Berg; Gesa Eyl; Josef Kessler; Klaus Lackner; Axel Gossmann
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Sedation procedures in MR imaging: safety, effectiveness, and nursing effect on examinations.

Authors:  D A Bluemke; S N Breiter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Adult claustrophobia, anxiety and sedation in MRI.

Authors:  K J Murphy; J A Brunberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Evidence for fear of restriction and fear of suffocation as components of claustrophobia.

Authors:  L M Harris; J Robinson; R G Menzies
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1999-02

6.  Claustrophobia during MR imaging.

Authors:  R B Granet; L J Gelber
Journal:  N J Med       Date:  1990-06

Review 7.  Anxiety-related reactions associated with magnetic resonance imaging examinations.

Authors:  J C Meléndez; E McCrank
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Claustrophobia and the magnetic resonance imaging procedure.

Authors:  H K McIsaac; D S Thordarson; R Shafran; S Rachman; G Poole
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1998-06

9.  Claustrophobia and premature termination of magnetic resonance imaging examinations.

Authors:  Iris Eshed; Christian E Althoff; Bernd Hamm; Kay-Geert A Hermann
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Anxiety and its determinants in patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R C Katz; L Wilson; N Frazer
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  1994-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  Minimizing table time in patients with claustrophobia using focused ferumoxytol-enhanced MR angiography (f-FEMRA): a feasibility study.

Authors:  Puja Shahrouki; Kim-Lien Nguyen; John M Moriarty; Adam N Plotnik; Takegawa Yoshida; J Paul Finn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.629

2.  High-field open versus short-bore magnetic resonance imaging of the spine: a randomized controlled comparison of image quality.

Authors:  Judith Enders; Matthias Rief; Elke Zimmermann; Patrick Asbach; Gerd Diederichs; Christoph Wetz; Eberhard Siebert; Moritz Wagner; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Patient preferences for development in MRI scanner design: a survey of claustrophobic patients in a randomized study.

Authors:  Elisa Iwan; Jinhua Yang; Judith Enders; Adriane Elisabeth Napp; Matthias Rief; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.