Literature DB >> 9084025

Adult claustrophobia, anxiety and sedation in MRI.

K J Murphy1, J A Brunberg.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the proportion of adult patients at our institution who require sedation to tolerate MR imaging. We also wished to identify whether the type of study and patient age or sex was associated with a variation in the use of sedation. A total of 939 patients, 18 years of age or older, underwent MR imaging at a large university hospital during a randomly selected 7-week period. Age, sex, type of study, number of prior MRI's, and use of sedation were identified in this group. Patients requiring sedation were compared by these criteria to all non-sedated members over 18 years of age in the cohort who acted as a control. Of the 939 patients 134 (14.3%) required oral sedation, i.v. sedation, or general anesthesia to tolerate MRI. This group was 35.8% male, 64.1% female (control group 48.1% male, 51.9% female). Of those requiring sedation, 89 patients (66.4%) were having brain MRI (male n = 29 or 32.6%, female n = 60 or 67.4%). In the control group 461 patients (57.3%) were having brain MRI (male n = 209 or 45.3%, female n = 252 or 54.6%). The mean age of the sedated group was 60.75 (range 19-91). The non-sedated group had a mean age of 67.3 (range 28-93). The sedated group had undergone a mean of 1.56 prior MR studies (range 0-16); the control group had a mean of 0.9 prior studies (range 0-7). Sedation was more commonly utilized in women than men, in patients having brain MRI, and in patients who had undergone prior MRI procedures. The identification of a population having the greatest need for sedation may aid in the development and selection of methods of stress reduction which will result in greater patient comfort, reduction in motion artifact, and fewer prematurely terminated studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9084025     DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(96)00351-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  33 in total

1.  Comparison of brain MR images at 1.5T using BLADE and rectilinear techniques for patients who move during data acquisition.

Authors:  E Nyberg; G S Sandhu; J Jesberger; K A Blackham; D P Hsu; M A Griswold; J L Sunshine
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Mohammad Naseem Shareef
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 3.  Clinical applications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Constantin B Marcu; Aernout M Beek; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Empirical examination of the potential adverse psychological effects associated with pediatric FMRI scanning.

Authors:  Tomer Shechner; Naomi Wakschlag; Jennifer C Britton; Johanna Jarcho; Monique Ernst; Daniel S Pine
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.576

5.  Patient Monitoring System for MRI: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2003-12-01

6.  Meditative music listening to reduce state anxiety in patients during the uptake phase before positron emission tomography (PET) scans.

Authors:  Wen-Li Lee; Huei-Chuan Sung; Shu-Hsin Liu; Shu-Min Chang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnostic purposes in operative dentistry-a systematic review.

Authors:  Silwan Mendes; Carin A Rinne; Julia C Schmidt; Dorothea Dagassan-Berndt; Clemens Walter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Pinpointing moments of high anxiety during an MRI examination.

Authors:  Daisy van Minde; Laura Klaming; Hans Weda
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-06

9.  Impact of sensory design interventions on image quality, patient anxiety and overall patient experience at MRI.

Authors:  Emma Stanley; Andrea Cradock; James Bisset; Ciara McEntee; Martin J O'Connell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  The functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) procedure as experienced by healthy participants and stroke patients--a pilot study.

Authors:  André J Szameitat; Shan Shen; Annette Sterr
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.