Literature DB >> 21597922

Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling of KEAP1 disrupted and sulforaphane-treated human breast epithelial cells reveals common expression profiles.

Abena S Agyeman1, Raghothama Chaerkady, Patrick G Shaw, Nancy E Davidson, Kala Visvanathan, Akhilesh Pandey, Thomas W Kensler.   

Abstract

Sulforaphane (SFN), an isothiocyanate found in cruciferous vegetables, is a potent inhibitor of experimental mammary carcinogenesis and may be an effective, safe chemopreventive agent for use in humans. SFN acts in part on the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway to regulate a battery of cytoprotective genes. In this study, transcriptomic and proteomic changes in the estrogen receptor negative, non-tumorigenic human breast epithelial MCF10A cell line were analyzed following SFN treatment or KEAP1 knockdown with siRNA using microarray and stable isotopic labeling with amino acids in culture (SILAC), respectively. Changes in selected transcripts and proteins were confirmed by PCR and Western blot in MCF10A and MCF12A cells. There was strong correlation between the transcriptomic and proteomic responses in both the SFN treatment (R = 0.679, P < 0.05) and KEAP1 knockdown (R = 0.853, P < 0.05) experiments. Common pathways for SFN treatment and KEAP1 knockdown were xenobiotic metabolism and antioxidants, glutathione metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and NADH/NADPH regeneration. Moreover, these pathways were most prominent in both the transcriptomic and the proteomic analyses. The aldo-keto reductase family members, AKR1B10, AKR1C1, AKR1C2 and AKR1C3, as well as NQO1 and ALDH3A1, were highly upregulated at both the transcriptomic and the proteomic levels. Collectively, these studies served to identify potential biomarkers that can be used in clinical trials to investigate the initial pharmacodynamic action of SFN in the breast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21597922      PMCID: PMC3564494          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1536-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  59 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  The 4-pregnene and 5alpha-pregnane progesterone metabolites formed in nontumorous and tumorous breast tissue have opposite effects on breast cell proliferation and adhesion.

Authors:  J P Wiebe; D Muzia; J Hu; D Szwajcer; S A Hill; J L Seachrist
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Transcriptome analysis of human colon Caco-2 cells exposed to sulforaphane.

Authors:  Maria Traka; Amy V Gasper; Julie A Smith; Chris J Hawkey; Yongping Bao; Richard F Mithen
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Comparative functional analysis of human medium-chain dehydrogenases, short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases and aldo-keto reductases with retinoids.

Authors:  Oriol Gallego; Olga V Belyaeva; Sergio Porté; F Xavier Ruiz; Anton V Stetsenko; Elena V Shabrova; Natalia V Kostereva; Jaume Farrés; Xavier Parés; Natalia Y Kedishvili
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Identification of polymorphic antioxidant response elements in the human genome.

Authors:  Xuting Wang; Daniel J Tomso; Brian N Chorley; Hye-Youn Cho; Vivian G Cheung; Steven R Kleeberger; Douglas A Bell
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  An Nrf2/small Maf heterodimer mediates the induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements.

Authors:  K Itoh; T Chiba; S Takahashi; T Ishii; K Igarashi; Y Katoh; T Oyake; N Hayashi; K Satoh; I Hatayama; M Yamamoto; Y Nabeshima
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1997-07-18       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 7.  Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of medications to reduce risk for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Rongwei Fu; Jessica C Griffin; Peggy Nygren; M E Beth Smith; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Molecular basis for chemoprevention by sulforaphane: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  N Juge; R F Mithen; M Traka
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  In vivo pharmacokinetics and regulation of gene expression profiles by isothiocyanate sulforaphane in the rat.

Authors:  Rong Hu; Vidya Hebbar; Bok-Ryang Kim; Chi Chen; Bozena Winnik; Brian Buckley; Patricia Soteropoulos; Peter Tolias; Ronald P Hart; A-N Tony Kong
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Down-regulation of phosphoglucomutase 3 mediates sulforaphane-induced cell death in LNCaP prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Chan-Hee Lee; Soo-Jin Jeong; Sun-Mi Yun; Ji-Hyun Kim; Hyo-Jung Lee; Kwang Seok Ahn; Suk-Hyun Won; Hyun Seok Kim; Hyo-Jeong Lee; Kyoo-Seok Ahn; Shudong Zhu; Chang-Yan Chen; Sung-Hoon Kim
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 2.480

View more
  90 in total

Review 1.  Dietary Sulforaphane in Cancer Chemoprevention: The Role of Epigenetic Regulation and HDAC Inhibition.

Authors:  Stephanie M Tortorella; Simon G Royce; Paul V Licciardi; Tom C Karagiannis
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 8.401

2.  Opportunities and challenges for nutritional proteomics in cancer prevention.

Authors:  Donato F Romagnolo; John A Milner
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 3.  NRF2 and the Hallmarks of Cancer.

Authors:  Montserrat Rojo de la Vega; Eli Chapman; Donna D Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  Role of Human Aldo-Keto Reductases in the Metabolic Activation of the Carcinogenic Air Pollutant 3-Nitrobenzanthrone.

Authors:  Jessica R Murray; Clementina A Mesaros; Volker M Arlt; Albrecht Seidel; Ian A Blair; Trevor M Penning
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 5.  Nrf2: a potential target for new therapeutics in liver disease.

Authors:  A M Bataille; J E Manautou
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Specificity of human aldo-keto reductases, NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase, and carbonyl reductases to redox-cycle polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon diones and 4-hydroxyequilenin-o-quinone.

Authors:  Carol A Shultz; Amy M Quinn; Jong-Heum Park; Ronald G Harvey; Judy L Bolton; Edmund Maser; Trevor M Penning
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.739

7.  Epigenetic Regulation by Sulforaphane: Opportunities for Breast and Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention.

Authors:  Lauren L Atwell; Laura M Beaver; Jackilen Shannon; David E Williams; Roderick H Dashwood; Emily Ho
Journal:  Curr Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2015-04-01

8.  Transcriptome analysis reveals a dynamic and differential transcriptional response to sulforaphane in normal and prostate cancer cells and suggests a role for Sp1 in chemoprevention.

Authors:  Laura M Beaver; Alex Buchanan; Elizabeth I Sokolowski; Allison N Riscoe; Carmen P Wong; Jeff H Chang; Christiane V Löhr; David E Williams; Roderick H Dashwood; Emily Ho
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 5.914

Review 9.  Structural and Functional Biology of Aldo-Keto Reductase Steroid-Transforming Enzymes.

Authors:  Trevor M Penning; Phumvadee Wangtrakuldee; Richard J Auchus
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 10.  Frugal chemoprevention: targeting Nrf2 with foods rich in sulforaphane.

Authors:  Li Yang; Dushani L Palliyaguru; Thomas W Kensler
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.929

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.