Literature DB >> 21596871

Head and neck position for direct laryngoscopy.

Mohammad El-Orbany1, Harvey Woehlck, M Ramez Salem.   

Abstract

The sniffing position (SP) has traditionally been considered the optimal head position for direct laryngoscopy (DL). Its superiority over other head positions, however, has been questioned during the last decade. We reviewed the scarce literature on the subject to examine the evidence either in favor or against the routine use of the SP. A standard definition for the position should be used (e.g., 35° neck flexion and 15° head extension) to avoid confusion about what constitutes a proper SP and to compare the results from different studies. Although several theories were proposed to explain the superiority of the SP, the three axes alignment theory is still considered a valid anatomical explanation. Although head elevation is needed to achieve the desired neck flexion, the elevation height may vary from one patient to another depending on head and neck anatomy and size of the chest. In infants and small children, for example, no head elevation is needed because the size and shape of the head allow axes approximation in the head-flat position. Horizontal alignment of the external auditory meatus with the sternum, in both obese and non-obese patients, indicates, and can be used as a marker for, proper positioning. Analysis of the available literature supports the use of the SP for DL. To achieve a proper SP in obese patients, the "ramped" (or the back-up) position should be used. The SP does not guarantee adequate exposure in all patients, because many other anatomical factors control the final degree of visualization. However, it should be the starting head position for DL because it provides the best chance at adequate exposure. Attention to details during positioning and avoidance of minor technical errors are essential to achieve the proper position. DL should be a dynamic procedure and position adjustment should be instituted in case poor visualization is encountered in the SP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21596871     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31821c7e9c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  29 in total

1.  Cricoid-mental distance-based versus weight-based criteria for size selection of classic laryngeal mask airway in adults: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Yanling Zhu; Weihua Shen; Yiquan Lin; Ting Huang; Ling Xie; Yao Yang; Hongbin Chen; Xiaoliang Gan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  The factors affecting success rate of emergency intubation.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Ding; Shi-Yu Wang; Rui-Min Yang; Fu-Shan Xue
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  "Hanger" in Intubation and Laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Devkumar Rengaraja; Mohan Jagade; Radhika Sonate; Karthik Rao; Deoshri Ramtek
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-04-03

Review 4.  Anaesthetic management of acute airway obstruction.

Authors:  Patrick Wong; Jolin Wong; May Un Sam Mok
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Prediction of difficulty in direct laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Ines Kharrat; Imen Achour; Jihene Jdidi Trabelsi; Majdi Trigui; Wadii Thabet; Malek Mnejja; Bouthaina Hammami; Amine Chakroun; Ilhem Charfeddine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Chest anteroposterior diameter affects difficulty of laryngoscopy for non-morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Ji-Won Choi; Jie-Ae Kim; Hae-Kyoung Kim; Min-Seok Oh; Duk-Kyung Kim
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Predictors of difficult videolaryngoscopy with GlideScope® or C-MAC® with D-blade: secondary analysis from a large comparative videolaryngoscopy trial.

Authors:  M F Aziz; E O Bayman; M M Van Tienderen; M M Todd; A M Brambrink
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Study comparing different airway assessment tests in predicting difficult laryngoscopy: A prospective study in geriatric patients.

Authors:  Pratibha Panjiar; Kharat Mohammed Bhat; Irshad Yousuf; Anjali Kochhar; Tanya Ralli
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2021-04-15

9.  Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 2. Planning and implementing safe management of the patient with an anticipated difficult airway.

Authors:  J Adam Law; Laura V Duggan; Mathieu Asselin; Paul Baker; Edward Crosby; Andrew Downey; Orlando R Hung; George Kovacs; François Lemay; Rudiger Noppens; Matteo Parotto; Roanne Preston; Nick Sowers; Kathryn Sparrow; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong; Philip M Jones
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  Comparison of endotracheal intubation using direct and video laryngoscopes in the ICU.

Authors:  Fu-Shan Xue; Yi Cheng; Rui-Ping Li
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.