Literature DB >> 21593550

Multiple factors may influence the performance of a visual prosthesis based on intracortical microstimulation: nonhuman primate behavioural experimentation.

K Torab1, T S Davis, D J Warren, P A House, R A Normann, B Greger.   

Abstract

We hypothesize that a visual prosthesis capable of evoking high-resolution visual perceptions can be produced using high-electrode-count arrays of penetrating microelectrodes implanted into the primary visual cortex of a blind human subject. To explore this hypothesis, and as a prelude to human psychophysical experiments, we have conducted a set of experiments in primary visual cortex (V1) of non-human primates using chronically implanted Utah Electrode Arrays (UEAs). The electrical and recording properties of implanted electrodes, the high-resolution visuotopic organization of V1, and the stimulation levels required to evoke behavioural responses were measured. The impedances of stimulated electrodes were found to drop significantly immediately following stimulation sessions, but these post-stimulation impedances returned to pre-stimulation values by the next experimental session. Two months of periodic microstimulation at currents of up to 96 µA did not impair the mapping of receptive fields from local field potentials or multi-unit activity, or impact behavioural visual thresholds of light stimuli that excited regions of V1 that were implanted with UEAs. These results demonstrate that microstimulation at the levels used did not cause functional impairment of the electrode array or the neural tissue. However, microstimulation with current levels ranging from 18 to 76 µA (46 ± 19 µA, mean ± std) was able to elicit behavioural responses on eight out of 82 systematically stimulated electrodes. We suggest that the ability of microstimulation to evoke phosphenes and elicit a subsequent behavioural response may depend on several factors: the location of the electrode tips within the cortical layers of V1, distance of the electrode tips to neuronal somata, and the inability of nonhuman primates to recognize and respond to a generalized set of evoked percepts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21593550      PMCID: PMC3144033          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/3/035001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  48 in total

1.  High-resolution two-dimensional spatial mapping of cat striate cortex using a 100-microelectrode array.

Authors:  D J Warren; E Fernandez; R A Normann
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Semi-chronic motorized microdrive and control algorithm for autonomously isolating and maintaining optimal extracellular action potentials.

Authors:  Jorge G Cham; Edward A Branchaud; Zoran Nenadic; Bradley Greger; Richard A Andersen; Joel W Burdick
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Propagation of epileptiform activity on a submillimeter scale.

Authors:  C A Schevon; R R Goodman; G McKhann; R G Emerson
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.177

4.  In vivo impedance spectroscopy of deep brain stimulation electrodes.

Authors:  Scott F Lempka; Svjetlana Miocinovic; Matthew D Johnson; Jerrold L Vitek; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  The visual sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the medial occipital cortex.

Authors:  G S Brindley; W S Lewin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Neuronal loss due to prolonged controlled-current stimulation with chronically implanted microelectrodes in the cat cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Douglas McCreery; Victor Pikov; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Distinct superficial and deep laminar domains of activity in the visual cortex during rest and stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander Maier; Geoffrey K Adams; Christopher Aura; David A Leopold
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-10

8.  A minimally invasive approach to long-term head fixation in behaving nonhuman primates.

Authors:  T S Davis; K Torab; P House; B Greger
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Spatial spread of the local field potential and its laminar variation in visual cortex.

Authors:  Dajun Xing; Chun-I Yeh; Robert M Shapley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Neural control of computer cursor velocity by decoding motor cortical spiking activity in humans with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Sung-Phil Kim; John D Simeral; Leigh R Hochberg; John P Donoghue; Michael J Black
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 5.379

View more
  24 in total

1.  New methods devised specify the size and color of the spots monkeys see when striate cortex (area V1) is electrically stimulated.

Authors:  Peter H Schiller; Warren M Slocum; Michelle C Kwak; Geoffrey L Kendall; Edward J Tehovnik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Properties of electrically evoked potentials activated by optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes of different modes in rabbits.

Authors:  Pengjia Cao; Jingjing Sun; Yan Yan; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Xiaodong Sun; Qiushi Ren; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Informative features of local field potential signals in primary visual cortex during natural image stimulation.

Authors:  Mojtaba Seyedhosseini; S Shushruth; Tyler Davis; Jennifer M Ichida; Paul A House; Bradley Greger; Alessandra Angelucci; Tolga Tasdizen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Differential Effects of Open- and Closed-Loop Intracortical Microstimulation on Firing Patterns of Neurons in Distant Cortical Areas.

Authors:  Alberto Averna; Valentina Pasquale; Maxwell D Murphy; Maria Piera Rogantin; Gustaf M Van Acker; Randolph J Nudo; Michela Chiappalone; David J Guggenmos
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  Retinal implants: emergence of a multidisciplinary field.

Authors:  Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.710

6.  Decoding stimulus identity from multi-unit activity and local field potentials along the ventral auditory stream in the awake primate: implications for cortical neural prostheses.

Authors:  Elliot Smith; Spencer Kellis; Paul House; Bradley Greger
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Simultaneous and independent control of a brain-computer interface and contralateral limb movement.

Authors:  Ivana Milovanovic; Robert Robinson; Eberhard E Fetz; Chet T Moritz
Journal:  Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon)       Date:  2015-09-14

8.  A cognitive neuroprosthetic that uses cortical stimulation for somatosensory feedback.

Authors:  Christian Klaes; Ying Shi; Spencer Kellis; Juri Minxha; Boris Revechkis; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Dynamic Stimulation of Visual Cortex Produces Form Vision in Sighted and Blind Humans.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Denise Oswalt; Ping Sun; Brett L Foster; John F Magnotti; Soroush Niketeghad; Nader Pouratian; William H Bosking; Daniel Yoshor
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Spatial and temporal characteristics of V1 microstimulation during chronic implantation of a microelectrode array in a behaving macaque.

Authors:  T S Davis; R A Parker; P A House; E Bagley; S Wendelken; R A Normann; B Greger
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.