BACKGROUND: Understanding the full effect of chronic low-dose folic acid is important in interpreting the effect of the mandatory folic acid fortification program in North America. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the rate of attainment and steady state (plateau) of red blood cell (RBC) folate in response to long-term intake of 140 μg (designed to mimic fortification) and 400 μg (recommended dose for the primary prevention of neural tube defects) folic acid/d in reproductive-aged women living in a country with minimal fortification. DESIGN: On the basis of pharmacokinetics principles, it was recently proposed that a steady state should be reached after 40 wk. Thus, 144 women aged 18-40 y were randomly assigned to receive a daily folic acid supplement of 140 (n = 49) or 400 (n = 48) μg or placebo (n = 47) for 40 wk. RBC folate was measured at baseline and at 6, 12, 29, and 40 wk. RESULTS: After 40 wk, RBC folate did not reach a plateau in either treatment group. Kinetic modeling of the data indicated that RBC folate would approximately double from 779 to 1356 nmol/L in response to 140 μg folic acid/d with only ≈50% of model-estimated steady state conditions achieved at 40 wk. An average RBC folate concentration of 1068 nmol/L after 12 wk of supplementation with 400 μg folic acid/d was readily achieved at 36 wk after continuous intake of 140 μg/d. CONCLUSION: Our model shows the considerable length of time required to attain the full effect of low-dose folic acid, which suggests that 140 μg folic acid/d could be as effective as 400 μg folic acid/d taken during the periconceptional period if given sufficient time. This trial is registered at www.anzctr.org.au as ACTRN12609000215224.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Understanding the full effect of chronic low-dose folic acid is important in interpreting the effect of the mandatory folic acid fortification program in North America. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the rate of attainment and steady state (plateau) of red blood cell (RBC) folate in response to long-term intake of 140 μg (designed to mimic fortification) and 400 μg (recommended dose for the primary prevention of neural tube defects) folic acid/d in reproductive-aged women living in a country with minimal fortification. DESIGN: On the basis of pharmacokinetics principles, it was recently proposed that a steady state should be reached after 40 wk. Thus, 144 women aged 18-40 y were randomly assigned to receive a daily folic acid supplement of 140 (n = 49) or 400 (n = 48) μg or placebo (n = 47) for 40 wk. RBC folate was measured at baseline and at 6, 12, 29, and 40 wk. RESULTS: After 40 wk, RBC folate did not reach a plateau in either treatment group. Kinetic modeling of the data indicated that RBC folate would approximately double from 779 to 1356 nmol/L in response to 140 μg folic acid/d with only ≈50% of model-estimated steady state conditions achieved at 40 wk. An average RBC folate concentration of 1068 nmol/L after 12 wk of supplementation with 400 μg folic acid/d was readily achieved at 36 wk after continuous intake of 140 μg/d. CONCLUSION: Our model shows the considerable length of time required to attain the full effect of low-dose folic acid, which suggests that 140 μg folic acid/d could be as effective as 400 μg folic acid/d taken during the periconceptional period if given sufficient time. This trial is registered at www.anzctr.org.au as ACTRN12609000215224.
Authors: R J Berry; Z Li; J D Erickson; S Li; C A Moore; H Wang; J Mulinare; P Zhao; L Y Wong; J Gindler; S X Hong; A Correa Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-11-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bernard J Venn; Timothy J Green; Rudolf Moser; Joanne E McKenzie; C Murray Skeaff; Jim Mann Journal: J Nutr Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Judith M Wolfe; Lynn B Bailey; Kelli Herrlinger-Garcia; Douglas W Theriaque; Jesse F Gregory; Gail P A Kauwell Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Meng-Yu Chen; Charles E Rose; Yan Ping Qi; Jennifer L Williams; Lorraine F Yeung; Robert J Berry; Ling Hao; Michael J Cannon; Krista S Crider Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Cheryl A M Anderson; Shirley A A Beresford; Dale McLerran; Johanna W Lampe; Samir Deeb; Ziding Feng; Arno G Motulsky Journal: Mol Nutr Food Res Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 5.914
Authors: Shannon E Kelly; Linda S Greene-Finestone; Elizabeth A Yetley; Karima Benkhedda; Stephen P J Brooks; George A Wells; Amanda J MacFarlane Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Rima Obeid; Christiane Schön; Manfred Wilhelm; Rajiv P Shrestha; Stefan Pilz; Klaus Pietrzik Journal: Mol Nutr Food Res Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 5.914
Authors: Arnaud Laillou; Jacques Berger; Bach Mai Le; Van Thuy Pham; Thi Hop Le; Cong Khan Nguyen; Dora Panagides; Fabian Rohner; Frank Wieringa; Regina Moench-Pfanner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mareile Niesser; Hans Demmelmair; Thea Weith; Diego Moretti; Astrid Rauh-Pfeiffer; Marola van Lipzig; Wouter Vaes; Berthold Koletzko; Wolfgang Peissner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: M B Krawinkel; D Strohm; A Weissenborn; B Watzl; M Eichholzer; K Bärlocher; I Elmadfa; E Leschik-Bonnet; H Heseker Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 4.016