SCOPE: By increasing blood folate concentrations, folic acid supplementation reduces risk for neural tube defect-affected pregnancies, and lowers homocysteine concentrations. We assessed response of red blood cell (RBC) and serum folate to folic acid supplementation, and examined association of response with the genetic polymorphism C677T of the methylenetetrahydrofolate NAD(P)H (MTHFR) gene. METHODS AND RESULTS: Randomized, controlled, crossover trial with two folic acid supplement treatment periods and a 30-week washout period. The primary outcome is blood folate (serum and RBC) concentrations. Volunteers (n = 142) aged 18-69 were randomized to two of three doses (0, 200, and 400 μg) of folic acid for 12 weeks. Serum folate response depended on treatment period with significant responses to 200 μg seen only in the second treatment periods (4.4 ng/mL or 3.4 ng/mL). Additionally, serum folate increased as folic acid dose increased to 400 μg (p < 0.01) and response was greater after the washout period (8.7 ng/mL), than after a 6-week run-in (2.3 ng/mL). The differential change attributable to a daily supplement of 400 μg compared to 200 μg was 96.8 ng/mL; while the change attributable to 400 μg compared to 0 μg was 121.4. Increases in RBC folate concentrations with 400 μg occurred within MTHFR gene mutation (C677T); and in the African American group. CONCLUSION:Serum folate concentration is responsive to modest increases in folic acid intake. RBC folate increases only with higher additional doses of folic acid supplementation, and this is true for each MTHFR C677T genotype.
RCT Entities:
SCOPE: By increasing blood folate concentrations, folic acid supplementation reduces risk for neural tube defect-affected pregnancies, and lowers homocysteine concentrations. We assessed response of red blood cell (RBC) and serum folate to folic acid supplementation, and examined association of response with the genetic polymorphism C677T of the methylenetetrahydrofolate NAD(P)H (MTHFR) gene. METHODS AND RESULTS: Randomized, controlled, crossover trial with two folic acid supplement treatment periods and a 30-week washout period. The primary outcome is blood folate (serum and RBC) concentrations. Volunteers (n = 142) aged 18-69 were randomized to two of three doses (0, 200, and 400 μg) of folic acid for 12 weeks. Serum folate response depended on treatment period with significant responses to 200 μg seen only in the second treatment periods (4.4 ng/mL or 3.4 ng/mL). Additionally, serum folate increased as folic acid dose increased to 400 μg (p < 0.01) and response was greater after the washout period (8.7 ng/mL), than after a 6-week run-in (2.3 ng/mL). The differential change attributable to a daily supplement of 400 μg compared to 200 μg was 96.8 ng/mL; while the change attributable to 400 μg compared to 0 μg was 121.4. Increases in RBC folate concentrations with 400 μg occurred within MTHFR gene mutation (C677T); and in the African American group. CONCLUSION: Serum folate concentration is responsive to modest increases in folic acid intake. RBC folate increases only with higher additional doses of folic acid supplementation, and this is true for each MTHFRC677T genotype.
Authors: I A Brouwer; M van Dusseldorp; M Duran; C M Thomas; J G Hautvast; T K Eskes; R P Steegers-Theunissen Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Angelika de Bree; W M Monique Verschuren; Anne-Lise Bjørke-Monsen; Nathalie M J van der Put; Sandra G Heil; Frans J M Trijbels; Henk J Blom Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: B J Venn; J I Mann; S M Williams; L J Riddell; A Chisholm; M J Harper; W Aitken; J I Rossaak Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Katherine L Tucker; Beth Olson; Peter Bakun; Gerard E Dallal; Jacob Selhub; Irwin H Rosenberg Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Christopher B Brady; J Michael Gaziano; Roberta A Cxypoliski; Peter D Guarino; James S Kaufman; Stuart R Warren; Pamela Hartigan; David S Goldfarb; Rex L Jamison Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Nafisa M Jadavji; Lauren K Murray; Joshua T Emmerson; Chris A Rudyk; Shawn Hayley; Patrice D Smith Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Rima Obeid; Christiane Schön; Manfred Wilhelm; Rajiv P Shrestha; Stefan Pilz; Klaus Pietrzik Journal: Mol Nutr Food Res Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 5.914
Authors: Jéssica Vanessa de Carvalho Lisboa; Marina Ramalho Ribeiro; Rafaella Cristhine Pordeus Luna; Raquel Patrícia Ataíde Lima; Rayner Anderson Ferreira do Nascimento; Mussara Gomes Cavalcante Alves Monteiro; Keylha Querino de Farias Lima; Carla Patrícia Novaes Dos Santos Fechine; Naila Francis Paulo de Oliveira; Darlene Camati Persuhn; Robson Cavalcante Veras; Maria da Conceição Rodrigues Gonçalves; Flávia Emília Leite de Lima Ferreira; Roberto Teixeira Lima; Alexandre Sérgio da Silva; Alcides da Silva Diniz; Aléssio Tony Cavalcanti de Almeida; Ronei Marcos de Moraes; Eliseu Verly Junior; Maria José de Carvalho Costa Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-01-30 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Rhodi E Bulloch; Clare R Wall; Lesley M E McCowan; Rennae S Taylor; Claire T Roberts; John M D Thompson Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 5.717