Literature DB >> 34605544

NUQUEST-NUtrition QUality Evaluation Strengthening Tools: development of tools for the evaluation of risk of bias in nutrition studies.

Shannon E Kelly1, Linda S Greene-Finestone2, Elizabeth A Yetley3, Karima Benkhedda4, Stephen P J Brooks4,5, George A Wells1, Amanda J MacFarlane4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dietary exposure assessments are a critical issue in evaluating human nutrition studies; however, nutrition-specific criteria are not consistently included in existing bias assessment tools.
OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to develop a set of risk of bias (RoB) tools that integrated nutrition-specific criteria into validated generic assessment tools to address RoB issues, including those specific to dietary exposure assessment.
METHODS: The Nutrition QUality Evaluation Strengthening Tools (NUQUEST) development and validation process included 8 steps. The first steps identified 1) a development strategy; 2) generic assessment tools with demonstrated validity; and 3) nutrition-specific appraisal issues. This was followed by 4) generation of nutrition-specific items and 5) development of guidance to aid users of NUQUEST. The final steps used established ratings of selected studies and feedback from independent raters to 6) assess reliability and validity; 7) assess formatting and usability; and 8) finalize NUQUEST.
RESULTS: NUQUEST is based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network checklists for randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies. Using a purposive sample of 45 studies representing the 3 study designs, interrater reliability was high (Cohen's κ: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.52, 0.93) across all tools and at least moderate for individual tools (range: 0.57-1.00). The use of a worksheet improved usability and consistency of overall interrater agreement across all study designs (40% without worksheet, 80%-100% with worksheet). When compared to published ratings, NUQUEST ratings for evaluated studies demonstrated high concurrent validity (93% perfect or near-perfect agreement). Where there was disagreement, the nutrition-specific component was a contributing factor in discerning exposure methodological issues.
CONCLUSIONS: NUQUEST integrates nutrition-specific criteria with generic criteria from assessment tools with demonstrated reliability and validity. NUQUEST represents a consistent and transparent approach for evaluating RoB issues related to dietary exposure assessment commonly encountered in human nutrition studies. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Health, 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  case-control study; cohort study; nutrition; quality assessment instrument; randomized controlled trial; risk of bias tool

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34605544      PMCID: PMC8755056          DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  45 in total

Review 1.  Application of systematic review methodology to the field of nutrition.

Authors:  Alice H Lichtenstein; Elizabeth A Yetley; Joseph Lau
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 2.  Evidence Collection and Evaluation for the Development of Dietary Guidelines and Public Policy on Nutrition.

Authors:  Dena Zeraatkar; Bradley C Johnston; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 3.  Options for basing Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) on chronic disease endpoints: report from a joint US-/Canadian-sponsored working group.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Yetley; Amanda J MacFarlane; Linda S Greene-Finestone; Cutberto Garza; Jamy D Ard; Stephanie A Atkinson; Dennis M Bier; Alicia L Carriquiry; William R Harlan; Dale Hattis; Janet C King; Daniel Krewski; Deborah L O'Connor; Ross L Prentice; Joseph V Rodricks; George A Wells
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments.

Authors:  Anthony Hardy; Diane Benford; Thorhallur Halldorsson; Michael John Jeger; Helle Katrine Knutsen; Simon More; Hanspeter Naegeli; Hubert Noteborn; Colin Ockleford; Antonia Ricci; Guido Rychen; Josef R Schlatter; Vittorio Silano; Roland Solecki; Dominique Turck; Emilio Benfenati; Qasim Mohammad Chaudhry; Peter Craig; Geoff Frampton; Matthias Greiner; Andrew Hart; Christer Hogstrand; Claude Lambre; Robert Luttik; David Makowski; Alfonso Siani; Helene Wahlstroem; Jaime Aguilera; Jean-Lou Dorne; Antonio Fernandez Dumont; Michaela Hempen; Silvia Valtueña Martínez; Laura Martino; Camilla Smeraldi; Andrea Terron; Nikolaos Georgiadis; Maged Younes
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2017-08-03

5.  A dose-finding trial of the effect of long-term folic acid intervention: implications for food fortification policy.

Authors:  Paula Tighe; Mary Ward; Helene McNulty; Owen Finnegan; Adrian Dunne; Jj Strain; Anne M Molloy; Maresa Duffy; Kristina Pentieva; John M Scott
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Simultaneous association of total energy consumption and activity-related energy expenditure with risks of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Cheng Zheng; Shirley A Beresford; Linda Van Horn; Lesley F Tinker; Cynthia A Thomson; Marian L Neuhouser; Chongzhi Di; JoAnn E Manson; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Rebecca Seguin; Todd Manini; Andrea Z LaCroix; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Characteristics and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational nutritional epidemiology: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Dena Zeraatkar; Arrti Bhasin; Rita E Morassut; Isabella Churchill; Arnav Gupta; Daeria O Lawson; Anna Miroshnychenko; Emily Sirotich; Komal Aryal; David Mikhail; Tauseef A Khan; Vanessa Ha; John L Sievenpiper; Steven E Hanna; Joseph Beyene; Russell J de Souza
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 8.  A scoping review of rapid review methods.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Jesmin Antony; Wasifa Zarin; Lisa Strifler; Marco Ghassemi; John Ivory; Laure Perrier; Brian Hutton; David Moher; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Methods for trustworthy nutritional recommendations NutriRECS (Nutritional Recommendations and accessible Evidence summaries Composed of Systematic reviews): a protocol.

Authors:  Bradley C Johnston; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Malgorzata M Bala; Dena Zeraatkar; Montserrat Rabassa; Claudia Valli; Catherine Marshall; Regina El Dib; Robin W M Vernooij; Per O Vandvik; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools.

Authors:  Persis Katrak; Andrea E Bialocerkowski; Nicola Massy-Westropp; Saravana Kumar; Karen A Grimmer
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.