Literature DB >> 21591851

Patient experience and satisfaction with awake craniotomy for brain tumours.

S S Wahab1, P L Grundy, C Weidmann.   

Abstract

Awake craniotomy is increasingly used to facilitate safe maximal resection of brain tumours. Very little published data is available to determine patient experiences and satisfaction. This knowledge may lead to improvement in technique and enhance future patient care. In 2006, we began to use conscious sedation ('full awake technique') for craniotomies for tumour resection. A questionnaire designed with reference to Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) guidelines was sent out to 60 consecutive patients. Four areas of care were explored. These included the out-patient consultation with the neurosurgeon, anaesthetic consultation, operation and the post-operative period. Fourty-five responses were received. Ninety-three percent of the patients in our study felt involved sufficiently in the decision for awake surgery and felt they were given enough information when seen in the surgical consultation. However, only 64% of patients received written information in advance of their surgical date. Ninety-one percent of patients were confident that they would be looked after during surgery following their anaesthetic consultation. Eighty-seven percent of patients felt at ease during surgery. Twenty-four percent experienced some discomfort during surgery, some of which was related to positioning of the patient rather than surgical technique. Fifty-six percent of our patients reported no post-operative pain. Eighty-four percent of patients were happy with timing of their discharge. Eighty percent felt well supported post-discharge. This study demonstrates high levels of patient satisfaction and provides surgeons with useful data for consenting patients. We identified no difference in levels of patient satisfaction comparing day-case patients with those admitted. We identified areas for improvement including provision of written information, enhancing post-discharge support and allowing more time for anaesthetic discussion before surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21591851     DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2011.568642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Anesthesiological management of awake craniotomy : Asleep-awake-asleep technique or without sedation].

Authors:  M Seemann; N Zech; B Graf; E Hansen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  The Use of Standardized Intraoperative Language Tests in Awake Craniotomies: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Christos Papatzalas; Kostas Fountas; Eftychia Kapsalaki; Ilias Papathanasiou
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 3.  Patient-reported intraoperative experiences during awake craniotomy for brain tumors: a scoping review.

Authors:  Kathleen Joy O Khu; Juan Silvestre G Pascual; Katrina Hannah D Ignacio
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Compassion, communication, and the perception of control: a mixed methods study to investigate patients' perspectives on clinical practices for alleviating distress and promoting empowerment during awake craniotomies.

Authors:  Dana Dharmakaya Colgan; Ashely Eddy; Margarita Aulet-Leon; Kaylie Green; Betts Peters; Robert Shangraw; Marie Angele Theard; Seunggu Jude Han; Ahmed Raslan; Barry Oken
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.124

Review 5.  Awake craniotomy: A qualitative review and future challenges.

Authors:  Mahmood Ghazanwy; Rajkalyan Chakrabarti; Anurag Tewari; Ashish Sinha
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-10

6.  Awake craniotomy. A patient`s perspective.

Authors:  Khalid M Bajunaid; Abdulrazag M Ajlan
Journal:  Neurosciences (Riyadh)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.906

7.  Patient-reported experience measures in patients undergoing navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS): the introduction of nTMS-PREMs.

Authors:  Sabina Patel; Prajwal Ghimire; José Pedro Lavrador; Josephine Jung; Richard Gullan; Keyoumars Ashkan; Ranjeev Bhangoo; Francesco Vergani
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Ambulatory Surgery Protocol for Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Pituitary Adenomas: A Prospective Single-arm Trial with Initial Implementation Experience.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Tao Zheng; Wenhai Lv; Long Chen; Binfang Zhao; Xue Jiang; Lin Ye; Liang Qu; Lanfu Zhao; Yufu Zhang; Yafei Xue; Lei Chen; Bolin Liu; Yingxi Wu; Zhengmin Li; Jiangtao Niu; Ruigang Li; Yan Qu; Guodong Gao; Yuan Wang; Shiming He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The impact of preoperative anxiety on patients undergoing brain surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vittorio Oteri; Anna Martinelli; Elisa Crivellaro; Francesca Gigli
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.042

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.