Dana Dharmakaya Colgan1, Ashely Eddy2, Margarita Aulet-Leon3, Kaylie Green2, Betts Peters4, Robert Shangraw5, Marie Angele Theard5, Seunggu Jude Han6, Ahmed Raslan7, Barry Oken1. 1. Neurology Department, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 2. School of Graduate Psychology, Pacific University, Hillsboro, OR, USA. 3. School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 4. Institute on Development & Disability, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 5. Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 6. Natividad Medical Center, Salinas, CA, USA. 7. Neurosurgery Department, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To inquire into clinical practices perceived to mitigate patients' intraoperative distress during awake craniotomies. METHODS: This mixed-methods study involved administration of Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale and PTSD Checklist prior to the awake craniotomy to evaluate anxiety and information-seeking related to the procedure and symptoms of PTSD. Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale and Depression Module of the Patient Health Questionnaire were administered before and after the procedure to evaluate generalized anxiety and depression. Patient interviews were conducted 2-weeks postprocedure and included a novel set of patient experience scales to assess patients' recollection of intraoperative pain, overall distress, anxiety, distress due to noise, perception of empowerment, perception of being well-prepared, overall satisfaction with anaesthesia management, and overall satisfaction with the procedure. Qualitative data were analysed using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Participants (n = 14) had undergone an awake craniotomy for tissue resection due to primary brain tumours or medically-refractory focal epilepsy. Validated self-report questionnaires demonstrated reduced levels of generalized anxiety (pre mean = 8.66; SD = 6.41; post mean= 4.36; SD = 4.24) following the awake craniotomy. Postprocedure interviews revealed very high satisfaction with the awake craniotomy and anaesthesia management and minimal levels of intraoperative pain, anxiety, and distress. The most stressful aspects of the procedure included global recognition of medical diagnosis, anxiety provoked by unfamiliar sights, sounds, and sensations, a perception of a lack of information or misinformation, and long periods of immobility. Important factors in alleviating intraoperative distress included the medical team's ability to promote patient perceptions of control, establish compassionate relationships, address unfamiliar intraoperative sensations, and deliver effective anaesthesia management. CONCLUSION: Compassion, communication, and patient perception of control were critical in mitigating intraoperative distress. Clinical practice recommendations with implications for all clinicians involved in patient care during awake craniotomies are provided. Use of these interventions and strategies to reduce distress are important to holistic patient care and patient experiences of care and may improve the likelihood of optimal brain mapping procedures to improve clinical outcomes during awake craniotomies.
PURPOSE: To inquire into clinical practices perceived to mitigate patients' intraoperative distress during awake craniotomies. METHODS: This mixed-methods study involved administration of Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale and PTSD Checklist prior to the awake craniotomy to evaluate anxiety and information-seeking related to the procedure and symptoms of PTSD. Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale and Depression Module of the Patient Health Questionnaire were administered before and after the procedure to evaluate generalized anxiety and depression. Patient interviews were conducted 2-weeks postprocedure and included a novel set of patient experience scales to assess patients' recollection of intraoperative pain, overall distress, anxiety, distress due to noise, perception of empowerment, perception of being well-prepared, overall satisfaction with anaesthesia management, and overall satisfaction with the procedure. Qualitative data were analysed using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Participants (n = 14) had undergone an awake craniotomy for tissue resection due to primary brain tumours or medically-refractory focal epilepsy. Validated self-report questionnaires demonstrated reduced levels of generalized anxiety (pre mean = 8.66; SD = 6.41; post mean= 4.36; SD = 4.24) following the awake craniotomy. Postprocedure interviews revealed very high satisfaction with the awake craniotomy and anaesthesia management and minimal levels of intraoperative pain, anxiety, and distress. The most stressful aspects of the procedure included global recognition of medical diagnosis, anxiety provoked by unfamiliar sights, sounds, and sensations, a perception of a lack of information or misinformation, and long periods of immobility. Important factors in alleviating intraoperative distress included the medical team's ability to promote patient perceptions of control, establish compassionate relationships, address unfamiliar intraoperative sensations, and deliver effective anaesthesia management. CONCLUSION: Compassion, communication, and patient perception of control were critical in mitigating intraoperative distress. Clinical practice recommendations with implications for all clinicians involved in patient care during awake craniotomies are provided. Use of these interventions and strategies to reduce distress are important to holistic patient care and patient experiences of care and may improve the likelihood of optimal brain mapping procedures to improve clinical outcomes during awake craniotomies.
Authors: Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Tom J van Ark; Markus Klimek; Peter de Smalen; Arnaud J P E Vincent; Robert Jan Stolker Journal: Clin Neurol Neurosurg Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 1.876
Authors: Philip C De Witt Hamer; Santiago Gil Robles; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Hugues Duffau; Mitchel S Berger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-04-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: H Duffau; M Lopes; F Arthuis; A Bitar; J-P Sichez; R Van Effenterre; L Capelle Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 10.154