Literature DB >> 21590722

Analysis of complex cardiovascular flow with three-component acceleration-encoded MRI.

Alex J Barker1, Felix Staehle, Jelena Bock, Bernd A Jung, Michael Markl.   

Abstract

Functional information regarding cardiac performance, pressure gradients, and local flow derangement are available from blood acceleration fields. Thus, this study examines a 2D and 3D phase contrast sequence optimized to efficiently encode three-directional, time-resolved acceleration in vitro and in vivo. Stenosis phantom acceleration measurements were compared to acceleration derived from standard velocity encoded phase contrast-magnetic resonance imaging (i.e., "velocity-derived acceleration"). For in vivo analysis, three-directional 2D acceleration maps were compared to velocity-derived acceleration using regions proximal and distal to the aortic valve in six healthy volunteers at 1.5 and 3.0 T (voxel size = 1.4 × 2.1 × 8 mm, temporal resolution = 16-20 ms). In addition, a 4D acceleration sequence was evaluated for feasibility in a healthy volunteer and postrepair biscuspid aortic valve patient with an ascending aortic aneurysm. The phantom magnetic resonance acceleration measurements were more accurate (nonturbulent root mean square error = 2.2 vs. 5.1 m/s(2) for phase contrast-magnetic resonance imaging) and 10 times less noisy (nonturbulent σ = 0.9 vs. 13.6 m/s(2) for phase contrast-magnetic resonance imaging) than velocity-derived acceleration. Acceleration mapping of the left ventricular outflow tract and aortic arch exhibited signal voids colocated with complex flow events such as vortex formation and high order motion. 4D acceleration data, visualized in combination with the velocity data, may provide new insight into complex flow phenomena.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21590722     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  5 in total

1.  Viscous energy loss in the presence of abnormal aortic flow.

Authors:  Alex J Barker; Pim van Ooij; Krishna Bandi; Julio Garcia; Mazen Albaghdadi; Patrick McCarthy; Robert O Bonow; James Carr; Jeremy Collins; S Chris Malaisrie; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  4D flow imaging: current status to future clinical applications.

Authors:  Michael Markl; Susanne Schnell; Alex J Barker
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Optimization methods for magnetic resonance imaging gradient waveform design.

Authors:  Matthew J Middione; Michael Loecher; Kévin Moulin; Daniel B Ennis
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  4D Flow Analysis of BAV-Related Fluid-Dynamic Alterations: Evidences of Wall Shear Stress Alterations in Absence of Clinically-Relevant Aortic Anatomical Remodeling.

Authors:  Filippo Piatti; Francesco Sturla; Malenka M Bissell; Selene Pirola; Massimo Lombardi; Igor Nesteruk; Alessandro Della Corte; Alberto C L Redaelli; Emiliano Votta
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Pulmonary artery hemodynamic assessment of blood flow characteristics in repaired tetralogy of Fallot patients versus healthy child volunteers.

Authors:  Liwei Hu; Rongzhen Ouyang; Aimin Sun; Qian Wang; Chen Guo; Yafeng Peng; Yan Qin; Yong Zhang; Yang Xiang; Yumin Zhong
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.