PURPOSE: To present a theoretical basis for noninvasively characterizing in vivo fluid-mechanical energy losses and to apply it in a pilot study of patients known to express abnormal aortic flow patterns. METHODS: Four-dimensional flow MRI was used to characterize laminar viscous energy losses in the aorta of normal controls (n = 12, age = 37 ± 10 yr), patients with aortic dilation (n = 16, age = 52 ± 8 yr), and patients with aortic valve stenosis matched for age and aortic size (n = 14, age = 46 ± 15 yr), using a relationship between the three-dimensional velocity field and viscous energy dissipation. RESULTS: Viscous energy loss was elevated significantly in the thoracic aorta in patients with dilated aorta (3.6 ± 1.3 mW, P = 0.024) and patients with aortic stenosis (14.3 ± 8.2 mW, P < 0.001) compared with healthy volunteers (2.3 ± 0.9 mW). The same pattern of significant differences was seen in the ascending aorta, where viscous energy losses in patients with dilated aortas (2.2 ± 1.1 mW, P = 0.021) and patients with aortic stenosis (10.9 ± 6.8 mW, P < 0.001) were elevated compared with healthy volunteers (1.2 ± 0.6 mW). CONCLUSION: This technique provides a capability to quantify the contribution of abnormal laminar blood flow to increased ventricular afterload. In this pilot study, viscous energy loss in patient cohorts was significantly elevated and indicates that cardiac afterload is increased due to abnormal flow.
PURPOSE: To present a theoretical basis for noninvasively characterizing in vivo fluid-mechanical energy losses and to apply it in a pilot study of patients known to express abnormal aortic flow patterns. METHODS: Four-dimensional flow MRI was used to characterize laminar viscous energy losses in the aorta of normal controls (n = 12, age = 37 ± 10 yr), patients with aortic dilation (n = 16, age = 52 ± 8 yr), and patients with aortic valve stenosis matched for age and aortic size (n = 14, age = 46 ± 15 yr), using a relationship between the three-dimensional velocity field and viscous energy dissipation. RESULTS:Viscous energy loss was elevated significantly in the thoracic aorta in patients with dilated aorta (3.6 ± 1.3 mW, P = 0.024) and patients with aortic stenosis (14.3 ± 8.2 mW, P < 0.001) compared with healthy volunteers (2.3 ± 0.9 mW). The same pattern of significant differences was seen in the ascending aorta, where viscous energy losses in patients with dilated aortas (2.2 ± 1.1 mW, P = 0.021) and patients with aortic stenosis (10.9 ± 6.8 mW, P < 0.001) were elevated compared with healthy volunteers (1.2 ± 0.6 mW). CONCLUSION: This technique provides a capability to quantify the contribution of abnormal laminar blood flow to increased ventricular afterload. In this pilot study, viscous energy loss in patient cohorts was significantly elevated and indicates that cardiac afterload is increased due to abnormal flow.
Authors: Anand K Venkatachari; Sandra S Halliburton; Randolph M Setser; Richard D White; George P Chatzimavroudis Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-11-22 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Linda A Pape; Thomas T Tsai; Eric M Isselbacher; Jae K Oh; Patrick T O'gara; Arturo Evangelista; Rossella Fattori; Gabriel Meinhardt; Santi Trimarchi; Eduardo Bossone; Toru Suzuki; Jeanna V Cooper; James B Froehlich; Christoph A Nienaber; Kim A Eagle Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-08-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Martin Briand; Jean G Dumesnil; Lyes Kadem; Antonio G Tongue; Régis Rieu; Damien Garcia; Philippe Pibarot Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-07-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; Kanu Chatterjee; Antonio C de Leon; David P Faxon; Michael D Freed; William H Gaasch; Bruce W Lytle; Rick A Nishimura; Patrick T O'Gara; Robert A O'Rourke; Catherine M Otto; Pravin M Shah; Jack S Shanewise Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-09-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Heyder Omran; Harald Schmidt; Matthias Hackenbroch; Stefan Illien; Peter Bernhardt; Giso von der Recke; Rolf Fimmers; Sebastian Flacke; Günter Layer; Christoph Pohl; Berndt Lüderitz; Hans Schild; Torsten Sommer Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-04-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kevin K Whitehead; Kerem Pekkan; Hiroumi D Kitajima; Stephen M Paridon; Ajit P Yoganathan; Mark A Fogel Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-09-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Michael Markl; Andreas Harloff; Thorsten A Bley; Maxim Zaitsev; Bernd Jung; Ernst Weigang; Mathias Langer; Jürgen Hennig; Alex Frydrychowicz Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Joshua D Robinson; Michael J Rose; Maria Joh; Kelly Jarvis; Susanne Schnell; Alex J Barker; Cynthia K Rigsby; Michael Markl Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2018-12-01
Authors: Bradley D Allen; Lubna Choudhury; Alex J Barker; Pim van Ooij; Jeremy D Collins; Robert O Bonow; James C Carr; Michael Markl Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-08-09 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Julio Garcia; Alex J Barker; Pim van Ooij; Susanne Schnell; Jyothy Puthumana; Robert O Bonow; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Michal Schäfer; Alex J Barker; James Jaggers; Gareth J Morgan; Matthew L Stone; Uyen Truong; Lorna P Browne; Ladonna Malone; D Dunbar Ivy; Max B Mitchell Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Michael J Rose; Kelly Jarvis; Varun Chowdhary; Alex J Barker; Bradley D Allen; Joshua D Robinson; Michael Markl; Cynthia K Rigsby; Susanne Schnell Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Pim van Ooij; Bradley D Allen; Carla Contaldi; Julio Garcia; Jeremy Collins; James Carr; Lubna Choudhury; Robert O Bonow; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 4.813