Literature DB >> 21588931

(E)-3,5-Dimeth-oxy-benzaldehyde oxime.

Bin Dong, Yu Zhang, Jin-Zhe Chen.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(9)H(11)NO(3), the oxime grouping is twisted by 12.68 (6)° with respect to the dimethoxyl-benzene ring. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked into an infinite [100] chain via O-H⋯N hydrogen bonds, instead of the more common oxime packing motif of dimers with an R(2) (2)(6) graph-set motif.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21588931      PMCID: PMC3009152          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810038766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For backgroud to oximes as therapeutic agents, see: Marrs et al. (2006 ▶); Jokanovic et al. (2009 ▶). For related structures, see: Bao (2008 ▶); Abbas et al. (2010 ▶). For graph-set theory, see: Etter et al. (1990 ▶); Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C9H11NO3 M = 181.19 Orthorhombic, a = 4.4027 (9) Å b = 13.800 (3) Å c = 14.300 (3) Å V = 868.9 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.11 mm−1 T = 113 K 0.20 × 0.18 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Saturn CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku/MSC, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.979, T max = 0.990 7173 measured reflections 1239 independent reflections 1115 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.036

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.030 wR(F 2) = 0.081 S = 1.08 1239 reflections 124 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.22 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku/MSC, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810038766/hb5656sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810038766/hb5656Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C9H11NO3F(000) = 384
Mr = 181.19Dx = 1.385 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 3117 reflections
a = 4.4027 (9) Åθ = 2.1–27.9°
b = 13.800 (3) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
c = 14.300 (3) ÅT = 113 K
V = 868.9 (3) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.20 × 0.18 × 0.10 mm
Rigaku Saturn CCD area-detector diffractometer1239 independent reflections
Radiation source: rotating anode1115 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
multilayerRint = 0.036
Detector resolution: 7.31 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.9°, θmin = 2.1°
ω and φ scansh = −5→5
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku/MSC, 2005)k = −18→12
Tmin = 0.979, Tmax = 0.990l = −18→18
7173 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.030H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.081w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0566P)2 + 0.0067P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1239 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.22 e Å3
124 parametersΔρmin = −0.16 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.135 (12)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O11.1440 (3)0.57833 (8)1.13939 (7)0.0215 (3)
O21.2719 (3)0.66671 (7)0.81997 (7)0.0212 (3)
O30.2763 (3)0.27744 (7)0.90865 (7)0.0195 (3)
H30.211 (5)0.2351 (13)0.9537 (13)0.029*
N10.4898 (3)0.33604 (8)0.95540 (9)0.0159 (3)
C11.0843 (4)0.56661 (10)1.04608 (10)0.0170 (3)
C21.2075 (4)0.62501 (10)0.97646 (10)0.0179 (3)
H21.34040.67670.99230.021*
C31.1337 (4)0.60688 (10)0.88299 (10)0.0169 (3)
C40.9316 (4)0.53398 (10)0.85910 (10)0.0168 (3)
H40.87750.52330.79560.020*
C50.8078 (4)0.47596 (10)0.93064 (10)0.0156 (3)
C60.8833 (4)0.49179 (10)1.02358 (10)0.0167 (3)
H60.79940.45221.07140.020*
C71.3439 (4)0.65620 (10)1.16453 (11)0.0221 (4)
H7A1.53960.64761.13290.033*
H7B1.37520.65611.23240.033*
H7C1.25360.71801.14550.033*
C81.2008 (4)0.65223 (11)0.72320 (10)0.0255 (4)
H8A1.25740.58620.70480.038*
H8B1.31400.69900.68520.038*
H8C0.98240.66160.71350.038*
C90.5886 (3)0.40214 (10)0.90072 (10)0.0161 (3)
H90.51700.40350.83810.019*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0254 (6)0.0209 (5)0.0180 (5)−0.0057 (5)−0.0022 (5)−0.0001 (4)
O20.0242 (6)0.0191 (5)0.0204 (5)−0.0043 (4)0.0028 (5)0.0047 (4)
O30.0208 (6)0.0195 (5)0.0182 (5)−0.0073 (5)−0.0012 (5)−0.0006 (4)
N10.0136 (6)0.0151 (6)0.0188 (6)−0.0007 (5)−0.0006 (6)−0.0019 (4)
C10.0169 (7)0.0151 (7)0.0189 (7)0.0014 (6)−0.0015 (6)−0.0009 (5)
C20.0161 (7)0.0137 (6)0.0238 (7)−0.0007 (6)−0.0006 (6)−0.0007 (5)
C30.0156 (7)0.0135 (7)0.0218 (7)0.0024 (6)0.0032 (6)0.0038 (5)
C40.0175 (7)0.0163 (7)0.0166 (7)0.0015 (6)0.0001 (6)0.0009 (5)
C50.0132 (7)0.0134 (6)0.0203 (7)0.0018 (6)−0.0003 (6)0.0002 (5)
C60.0162 (7)0.0149 (7)0.0188 (7)−0.0005 (6)0.0008 (6)0.0020 (5)
C70.0230 (8)0.0214 (8)0.0218 (8)−0.0030 (6)−0.0016 (7)−0.0046 (6)
C80.0334 (10)0.0252 (8)0.0179 (8)−0.0010 (7)0.0049 (7)0.0048 (6)
C90.0157 (7)0.0171 (7)0.0156 (7)0.0010 (6)−0.0014 (6)0.0000 (5)
O1—C11.3697 (18)C4—C51.4089 (19)
O1—C71.4349 (19)C4—H40.9500
O2—C31.3653 (17)C5—C61.387 (2)
O2—C81.4328 (17)C5—C91.467 (2)
O3—N11.4087 (15)C6—H60.9500
O3—H30.916 (19)C7—H7A0.9800
N1—C91.2777 (18)C7—H7B0.9800
C1—C21.391 (2)C7—H7C0.9800
C1—C61.397 (2)C8—H8A0.9800
C2—C31.398 (2)C8—H8B0.9800
C2—H20.9500C8—H8C0.9800
C3—C41.386 (2)C9—H90.9500
C1—O1—C7116.76 (12)C5—C6—C1119.26 (14)
C3—O2—C8117.12 (12)C5—C6—H6120.4
N1—O3—H3103.9 (12)C1—C6—H6120.4
C9—N1—O3110.28 (12)O1—C7—H7A109.5
O1—C1—C2123.64 (14)O1—C7—H7B109.5
O1—C1—C6115.67 (13)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
C2—C1—C6120.68 (14)O1—C7—H7C109.5
C1—C2—C3119.34 (14)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C1—C2—H2120.3H7B—C7—H7C109.5
C3—C2—H2120.3O2—C8—H8A109.5
O2—C3—C4124.22 (13)O2—C8—H8B109.5
O2—C3—C2114.79 (13)H8A—C8—H8B109.5
C4—C3—C2120.98 (13)O2—C8—H8C109.5
C3—C4—C5118.82 (14)H8A—C8—H8C109.5
C3—C4—H4120.6H8B—C8—H8C109.5
C5—C4—H4120.6N1—C9—C5122.77 (13)
C6—C5—C4120.89 (14)N1—C9—H9118.6
C6—C5—C9123.12 (13)C5—C9—H9118.6
C4—C5—C9115.94 (13)
C7—O1—C1—C20.4 (2)C3—C4—C5—C60.7 (2)
C7—O1—C1—C6−178.53 (13)C3—C4—C5—C9178.22 (13)
O1—C1—C2—C3179.67 (14)C4—C5—C6—C10.2 (2)
C6—C1—C2—C3−1.4 (2)C9—C5—C6—C1−177.15 (13)
C8—O2—C3—C40.0 (2)O1—C1—C6—C5179.15 (14)
C8—O2—C3—C2−179.10 (14)C2—C1—C6—C50.2 (2)
C1—C2—C3—O2−178.50 (13)O3—N1—C9—C5178.28 (12)
C1—C2—C3—C42.3 (2)C6—C5—C9—N1−12.4 (2)
O2—C3—C4—C5178.97 (14)C4—C5—C9—N1170.15 (14)
C2—C3—C4—C5−2.0 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3···N1i0.916 (19)1.90 (2)2.7970 (17)166.5 (19)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O3—H3⋯N1i0.916 (19)1.90 (2)2.7970 (17)166.5 (19)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  6 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Graph-set analysis of hydrogen-bond patterns in organic crystals.

Authors:  M C Etter; J C MacDonald; J Bernstein
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  1990-04-01

Review 3.  Pyridinium oximes as cholinesterase reactivators. Structure-activity relationship and efficacy in the treatment of poisoning with organophosphorus compounds.

Authors:  Milan Jokanović; Milica Prostran
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  (E)-4-Nitro-benzaldehyde oxime.

Authors:  Asghar Abbas; Safdar Hussain; Noureen Hafeez; Amir Badshah; Aurangzeb Hasan; Kong Mun Lo
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-04-21

Review 5.  The role of oximes in the treatment of nerve agent poisoning in civilian casualties.

Authors:  Timothy C Marrs; Paul Rice; J Allister Vale
Journal:  Toxicol Rev       Date:  2006

6.  2,6-Dichloro-benzaldehyde oxime.

Authors:  Feng-Yu Bao
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-10-18
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Crystal structures and Hirshfeld surfaces of four meth-oxy-benzaldehyde oxime derivatives, 2-MeO-XC6H3C=NOH (X = H and 2-, 3- and 4-MeO): different conformations and hydrogen-bonding patterns.

Authors:  Ligia R Gomes; Marcus V N de Souza; Cristiane F Da Costa; James L Wardell; John Nicolson Low
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2018-10-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.