Literature DB >> 21588672

[Amino-(iminio)meth-yl]phospho-nate.

Ting-Hai Yang, Wei Zhuang, Wei Wei, Yong-Bing Yang, Qiang Chen.   

Abstract

The title compound, CH(5)N(2)O(3)P, exists as a zwitterion. The N atom of the imino group is protonated and the phospho-nic acid group is deprotonated. The mol-ecular geometry about the central C atom of this zwitterionic species was found to be strictly planar with the sum of the three angles about C being precisely 360°. In the crystal, the mol-ecules are inter-linked by O-H⋯O and N-H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter-actions, forming a three-dimensional supra-molecular network structure.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21588672      PMCID: PMC3007934          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810032083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to phospho­nic acid and metal phospho­nate compounds, see: Ayyappan et al. (2001 ▶); Clearfield (1998 ▶); Haga et al. (2007 ▶); Vivani et al. (2008 ▶); Bao et al. (2007 ▶); Cave et al. (2006 ▶); Cao et al. (1992 ▶); Ma et al. (2006 ▶, 2008 ▶). For a related structure, see Makarov et al. (1999 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

CH5N2O3P M = 124.04 Triclinic, a = 4.8559 (17) Å b = 5.910 (2) Å c = 8.101 (3) Å α = 99.570 (6)° β = 90.784 (6)° γ = 101.546 (6)° V = 224.36 (14) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.50 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.20 × 0.18 × 0.16 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007 ▶) T min = 0.907, T max = 0.924 1324 measured reflections 855 independent reflections 840 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.014

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.034 wR(F 2) = 0.161 S = 1.01 855 reflections 64 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.62 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.77 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810032083/jj2049sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810032083/jj2049Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
CH5N2O3PZ = 2
Mr = 124.04F(000) = 128
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.836 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 4.8559 (17) ÅCell parameters from 1436 reflections
b = 5.910 (2) Åθ = 2.6–30.3°
c = 8.101 (3) ŵ = 0.50 mm1
α = 99.570 (6)°T = 296 K
β = 90.784 (6)°Block, colorless
γ = 101.546 (6)°0.20 × 0.18 × 0.16 mm
V = 224.36 (14) Å3
Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer855 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube840 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.014
phi and ω scansθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007)h = −5→5
Tmin = 0.907, Tmax = 0.924k = −6→7
1324 measured reflectionsl = −9→9
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.161H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.01w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1046P)2 + 0.7669P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
855 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
64 parametersΔρmax = 0.62 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.77 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
P10.66113 (16)0.60637 (13)0.74674 (10)0.0149 (4)
O10.3963 (5)0.6733 (4)0.8092 (3)0.0225 (6)
O20.7837 (5)0.6917 (4)0.5956 (3)0.0224 (6)
O30.8828 (5)0.6695 (5)0.9016 (3)0.0224 (6)
H3B1.04810.61050.86960.034*
N10.7663 (7)0.1822 (5)0.6080 (4)0.0224 (7)
H1A0.74850.03240.59290.027*
H1B0.89180.26510.55660.027*
N20.4088 (7)0.1649 (5)0.7899 (4)0.0229 (7)
H2A0.38540.01480.77760.027*
H2B0.30470.23740.85540.027*
C10.6036 (7)0.2834 (6)0.7084 (4)0.0168 (7)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
P10.0130 (6)0.0125 (5)0.0216 (6)0.0045 (3)0.0061 (4)0.0070 (3)
O10.0156 (13)0.0197 (13)0.0350 (14)0.0076 (10)0.0086 (10)0.0073 (10)
O20.0245 (13)0.0199 (13)0.0271 (14)0.0067 (10)0.0113 (10)0.0124 (10)
O30.0150 (13)0.0271 (14)0.0247 (13)0.0047 (10)0.0029 (10)0.0032 (10)
N10.0243 (16)0.0139 (14)0.0318 (17)0.0057 (12)0.0124 (13)0.0088 (12)
N20.0263 (16)0.0145 (14)0.0299 (17)0.0052 (12)0.0138 (13)0.0074 (12)
C10.0170 (16)0.0147 (15)0.0207 (16)0.0044 (12)0.0026 (12)0.0073 (12)
P1—O21.487 (2)N1—H1A0.8600
P1—O11.490 (3)N1—H1B0.8600
P1—O31.587 (3)N2—C11.314 (5)
P1—C11.845 (3)N2—H2A0.8600
O3—H3B0.9600N2—H2B0.8600
N1—C11.299 (5)
O2—P1—O1119.46 (15)C1—N1—H1B120.0
O2—P1—O3111.94 (15)H1A—N1—H1B120.0
O1—P1—O3106.97 (15)C1—N2—H2A120.0
O2—P1—C1108.20 (15)C1—N2—H2B120.0
O1—P1—C1107.89 (15)H2A—N2—H2B120.0
O3—P1—C1100.70 (15)N1—C1—N2122.4 (3)
P1—O3—H3B109.3N1—C1—P1118.7 (3)
C1—N1—H1A120.0N2—C1—P1118.8 (3)
O2—P1—C1—N128.6 (3)O2—P1—C1—N2−154.6 (3)
O1—P1—C1—N1159.2 (3)O1—P1—C1—N2−24.1 (3)
O3—P1—C1—N1−88.9 (3)O3—P1—C1—N287.8 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3B···O1i0.961.752.611 (4)147.
N1—H1A···O2ii0.862.062.903 (4)167.
N2—H2A···O1ii0.862.092.924 (4)164.
N1—H1B···O2iii0.862.022.812 (4)153.
N2—H2B···O3iv0.862.213.008 (4)154.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O3—H3B⋯O1i0.961.752.611 (4)147
N1—H1A⋯O2ii0.862.062.903 (4)167
N2—H2A⋯O1ii0.862.092.924 (4)164
N1—H1B⋯O2iii0.862.022.812 (4)153
N2—H2B⋯O3iv0.862.213.008 (4)154

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

  6 in total

1.  Compounds with the "maple leaf" lattice: synthesis, structure, and magnetism of M(x)[Fe(O2CCH2)2NCH2PO3]6n.H2O.

Authors:  Dale Cave; Fiona C Coomer; Eduardo Molinos; Hans-Henning Klauss; Paul T Wood
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Anion-directed self-assembly of lanthanide-notp compounds and their fluorescence, magnetic, and catalytic properties.

Authors:  Song-Song Bao; Li-Fang Ma; Yin Wang; Ling Fang; Cheng-Jian Zhu; Yi-Zhi Li; Li-Min Zheng
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.236

4.  Dinuclear and layered copper 2-pyridylphosphonates with weak ferromagnetism observed in layer compound Cu(C5H4NPO3).

Authors:  Yun-Sheng Ma; You Song; Wen-Xin Du; Yi-Zhi Li; Li-Min Zheng
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 4.390

5.  New open frameworks based on metal pyridylphosphonates.

Authors:  P Ayyappan; O R Evans; B M Foxman; K A Wheeler; T H Warren; W Lin
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2001-11-05       Impact factor: 5.165

6.  Tetranuclear clusters containing a CrIII-doped MnIII4O2 core: syntheses, structures, and magnetic properties.

Authors:  Yun-Sheng Ma; Yi-Zhi Li; You Song; Li-Min Zheng
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 5.165

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.