| Literature DB >> 21586178 |
Maurizio Rossetto1, Katie Ag Thurlby, Catherine A Offord, Chris B Allen, Peter H Weston.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inter-population distance and differences in breeding times are barriers to reproduction that can contribute to genotypic differentiation between populations. Temporal changes in environmental conditions and local selective processes can further contribute to the establishment of reproductive barriers. Telopea speciosissima (Proteaceae) is an excellent subject for studying the effect of geographic, edaphic and phenological heterogeneity on genotypic differentiation because previous studies show that these factors are correlated with morphological variation. Molecular, morphological and environmental datasets were combined to characterise the relative influence of these factors on inter-population differentiation, and Bayesian analyses were used to investigate current levels of admixture between differentiated genomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21586178 PMCID: PMC3112089 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Distribution of populations and genotypic groups for . Distribution map of T. speciosissima (from herbarium records), with sampled population represented by a pie representing Q values for the three main groups identified by STRUCTURE at K = 3 (red: coastal group; green: upland group; blue: southern group). The map includes average maximum temperatures in degree intervals for the month of September (darkest orange: 21-22°C; yellow: 19-20°C; deepest blue: 11-12°C). Population numbers correspond to those listed in Table 1.
Figure 2Environmental maps for . a) Map including average maximum temperatures in degree intervals for the month of October. b) Map including average maximum temperatures in degree intervals for the month of November. c) Map including average annual rainfall in mm (darkest red: 600-700 mm; darkest blue: 1900-2000 mm). d) Map showing the distribution of all sandstone-derived geology types (in green) on which herbarium specimens of T. speciosissima are found.
Population genetic statistics for T. speciosissima
| Population | Latitude | Longitude | Alt (m) | N | A | Q Upland | Q South | Q Coast | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kulnura | 33 13 S | 151 12 E | 340 | 21 | 7.4 | 5.6 | 0.670 | 0.660 | 0.016 | 0.06 | 0.03 | |
| 2 | Newnes Forest | 33 24 S | 150 13 E | 1140 | 20 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 0.577 | 0.593 | -0.029 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| 3 | Mountain Lagoon | 33 27 S | 150 39 E | 590 | 20 | 6.6 | 5.5 | 0.721 | 0.693 | 0.040 | 0.65 | 0.03 | 0.32 |
| 4 | Bells Line of Road | 33 30 S | 150 16 E | 1090 | 20 | 5.1 | 4.4 | 0.676 | 0.693 | -0.025 | 0.01 | 0.02 | |
| 5 | Kurrajong Heights | 33 31 S | 150 37 E | 580 | 10 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 0.616 | 0.586 | 0.051 | 0.53 | 0.04 | 0.43 |
| 6 | Patonga | 33 32 S | 151 17 E | 180 | 19 | 6.1 | 5.1 | 0.682 | 0.669 | 0.020 | 0.05 | 0.03 | |
| 7 | West Head | 33 37 S | 151 17 E | 130 | 15 | 5.7 | 5.1 | 0.677 | 0.762 | -0.130* | 0.05 | 0.02 | |
| 8 | Duffys Forest | 33 39 S | 151 11 E | 190 | 22 | 7.9 | 6.0 | 0.701 | 0.649 | 0.076 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.80 |
| 9 | Watagan | 33 04 S | 151 20 E | 460 | 21 | 6.6 | 5.7 | 0.726 | 0.677 | 0.070 | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.73 |
| 10 | Kings Tableland | 33 46 S | 150 23 E | 810 | 21 | 6.9 | 5.9 | 0.728 | 0.748 | -0.029 | 0.02 | 0.06 | |
| 11 | Mt. Alexandra | 34 27 S | 150 27 E | 750 | 20 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 0.677 | 0.686 | -0.013 | 0.66 | 0.04 | 0.30 |
| 12 | Carrington Falls | 34 38 S | 150 39 E | 560 | 19 | 6.7 | 5.7 | 0.711 | 0.692 | 0.028 | 0.2 | 0.08 | 0.72 |
| 13 | Waterfall Flat (Royal NP) | 34 09 S | 151 00 E | 150 | 15 | 6.0 | 5.4 | 0.683 | 0.610 | 0.111* | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.86 |
| 14 | Bottle Forest (Royal NP) | 34 05 S | 151 00 E | 200 | 11 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 0.717 | 0.701 | 0.024 | 0.02 | 0.18 | 0.80 |
| 15 | Curra Moors (Royal NP) | 34 09 S | 151 05 E | 80 | 10 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.620 | 0.586 | 0.058 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.85 |
| 16 | Ulladulla | 35 22 S | 150 28 E | 40 | 21 | 5.3 | 4.4 | 0.601 | 0.612 | -0.018 | 0.01 | 0.02 | |
| 17 | Turpentine Range | 35 04 S | 150 25 E | 350 | 21 | 6.4 | 5.3 | 0.697 | 0.599 | 0.144** | 0.01 | 0.12 | |
| 18 | Jervis Bay | 35 08 S | 150 41 E | 50 | 20 | 5.3 | 4.6 | 0.670 | 0.650 | 0.030 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| Mean | - | - | - | 18.1 | 5.9 | 5.1 | 0.675 | 0.659 | 0.024 | - | - | - | |
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 (no FIS values were significant after Bonferroni corrections).
Population name, location and population-specific (as well as average) population genetic statistics for T. speciosissima. Number of individuals (N), allelic number (A) and richness (R10), expected (He) and observed (Ho) heterozygosities, inbreeding coefficient (Fis), and average assignment values (Q) to the three groups (upland, southern, coastal) identified by STRUCTURE at K = 3 (in bold the three populations with highest values) are listed.
Figure 3PCoA of genetic and morphological data. Plots of the first two principal coordinates obtained for T. speciosissima from the principal coordinate analysis of: a) pairwise genetic distances (by population) and b) morphometric distances (by individual).
Genetic structure and gene flow in T. speciosissima
| Average pair-wise values | FST | m | AMOVAs | Among Groups | Among Pops | Within Pops |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.127 | 1.877 | |||||
| Upland pops | 0.079 | 1.947 | Upland vs. rest | 16% † | 15% † | 71% † |
| Coastal pops | 0.056 | 3.091 | Coastal vs. rest | 3% † | 21% † | 76% † |
| Southern pops | 0.068 | 4.661 | Southern vs. rest | 15% † | 15% † | 70% † |
| Southern vs. rest | 0.174 | 0.812 | ||||
| Upland and Coastal vs. all others | 0.128 | 0.899 | Upland vs. Coastal vs. Southern | 25% † | 8% † | 67% † |
| Coastal vs. Intermediate | 0.079 | 1.981 | Upland vs. Coastal vs. Southern vs. all others | 15% † | 10% † | 75% † |
| Upland vs. Intermediate | 0.112 | 2.024 | Upland vs. Southern vs. all others | 18% † | 10% † | 72% † |
† P < 0.001
Measures of genetic structure and gene flow among selected population groupings (as identified by STUCTURE at K = 3). FST and estimated number of migrants (m) derived from Ne = 100 and derived from SHUA are presented, as well as relevant percentage of genetic diversity partitioned to within, between and among population groups (AMOVA) and significance values.
Figure 4Proportions of admixture among selected populations. New Hybrids results showing the relative proportion of admixture among genotypes representative of coastal, intermediate and upland populations. White represents pure coastal source, black pure upland source, and grey admixed origin.