Literature DB >> 12406254

Estimating allelic richness: effects of sample size and bottlenecks.

P L Leberg1.   

Abstract

Although differences in sampling intensity can bias comparisons of allelic richness (A) among populations, investigators often fail to correct estimates of A for differences in sample size. Methods that standardize A on the basis of the size of the smallest number of samples in a comparison are preferable to other approaches. Rarefaction and repeated random subsampling provide unbiased estimates of A with the greatest precision and thus provide greatest statistical power to detect differences in variation. Less promising approaches, in terms of bias or precision, include single random subsampling, eliminating very small samples, using sample size as a covariate or extrapolating estimates obtained from small samples to a larger number of individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12406254     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01612.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  87 in total

1.  The impact of selection on population genetic structure in the clam Meretrix petechialis revealed by microsatellite markers.

Authors:  Xia Lu; Hongxia Wang; Yan Li; Baozhong Liu
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Evolution of microsatellite loci in the adaptive radiation of Hawaiian honeycreepers.

Authors:  Lori S Eggert; Jon S Beadell; Andrew McClung; Carl E McIntosh; Robert C Fleischer
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2009-01-18       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Coming out of the starting blocks: extended lag time rearranges genetic diversity in introduced marine fishes of Hawai'i.

Authors:  Michelle R Gaither; Robert J Toonen; Brian W Bowen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Conservation genetics of maned wolves in a highly impacted area of the Brazilian Cerrado biome.

Authors:  Marília Bruzzi Lion; Eduardo Eizirik; Adrian Antonio Garda; Manoel Ludwig da Fontoura-Rodrigues; Flávio Henrique Guimarães Rodrigues; Jader Soares Marinho-Filho
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  The influence of gene flow and drift on genetic and phenotypic divergence in two species of Zosterops in Vanuatu.

Authors:  Sonya M Clegg; Albert B Phillimore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Contrasting responses to selection in class I and class IIα major histocompatibility-linked markers in salmon.

Authors:  S Consuegra; E de Eyto; P McGinnity; R J M Stet; W C Jordan
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Evidence that implicit assumptions of 'no evolution' of disease vectors in changing environments can be violated on a rapid timescale.

Authors:  Andrea Egizi; Nina H Fefferman; Dina M Fonseca
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Local-scale patterns of genetic variability, outcrossing, and spatial structure in natural stands of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Kirsten Bomblies; Levi Yant; Roosa A Laitinen; Sang-Tae Kim; Jesse D Hollister; Norman Warthmann; Joffrey Fitz; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Next-generation pyrosequencing of gonad transcriptomes in the polyploid lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens): the relative merits of normalization and rarefaction in gene discovery.

Authors:  Matthew C Hale; Cory R McCormick; James R Jackson; J Andrew Dewoody
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  A simple method for estimating genetic diversity in large populations from finite sample sizes.

Authors:  Stanislav Bashalkhanov; Madhav Pandey; Om P Rajora
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.