Literature DB >> 21585456

Using FMRI to test models of complex cognition.

John R Anderson1, Cameron S Carter, Jon M Fincham, Yulin Qin, Susan M Ravizza, Miriam Rosenberg-Lee.   

Abstract

This article investigates the potential of fMRI to test assumptions about different components in models of complex cognitive tasks. If the components of a model can be associated with specific brain regions, one can make predictions for the temporal course of the BOLD response in these regions. An event-locked procedure is described for dealing with temporal variability and bringing model runs and individual data trials into alignment. Statistical methods for testing the model are described that deal with the scan-to-scan correlations in the errors of measurement of the BOLD signal. This approach is illustrated using a "sacrificial" ACT-R model that involves mapping 6 modules onto 6 brain regions in an experiment from Ravizza, Anderson, and Carter (in press) concerned with equation solving. The model's visual encoding predicted the BOLD response in the fusiform gyrus, its controlled retrieval predicted the BOLD response in the lateral inferior prefrontal cortex, and its subgoal setting predicted the BOLD response in the anterior cingulate cortex. On the other hand, its motor programming failed to predict anticipatory activation in the motor cortex, its representational changes failed to predicted the pattern of activity in the posterior parietal cortex, and its procedural component failed to predict an initial spike in caudate. The results illustrate the power of such data to direct the development of a theory of complex problem solving, both at the level of a specific task model as well as at the level of the cognitive architecture. 2008 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Year:  2008        PMID: 21585456     DOI: 10.1080/03640210802451588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  14 in total

1.  Tracking children's mental states while solving algebra equations.

Authors:  John R Anderson; Shawn Betts; Jennifer L Ferris; Jon M Fincham
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  A review of neuroimaging studies in generalized anxiety disorder: "So where do we stand?"

Authors:  Bastiaan Goossen; Jeffrey van der Starre; Colin van der Heiden
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Lateral inferior prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex are engaged at different stages in the solution of insight problems.

Authors:  John R Anderson; John F Anderson; Jennifer L Ferris; Jon M Fincham; Kwan-Jin Jung
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Modeling Within-Item Dependencies in Parallel Data on Test Responses and Brain Activation.

Authors:  Minjeong Jeon; Paul De Boeck; Jevan Luo; Xiangrui Li; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  The Common Time Course of Memory Processes Revealed.

Authors:  John R Anderson; Jelmer P Borst; Jon M Fincham; Avniel Singh Ghuman; Caitlin Tenison; Qiong Zhang
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-07-10

6.  Visuospatial referents facilitate the learning and transfer of mathematical operations: extending the role of the angular gyrus.

Authors:  Aryn Pyke; Shawn Betts; Jon M Fincham; John R Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 7.  Reciprocal relations between cognitive neuroscience and formal cognitive models: opposites attract?

Authors:  Birte U Forstmann; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Tom Eichele; Scott Brown; John T Serences
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Cognitive and metacognitive activity in mathematical problem solving: prefrontal and parietal patterns.

Authors:  John R Anderson; Shawn Betts; Jennifer L Ferris; Jon M Fincham
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  The discovery of processing stages: Extension of Sternberg's method.

Authors:  John R Anderson; Qiong Zhang; Jelmer P Borst; Matthew M Walsh
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  A Bayesian framework for simultaneously modeling neural and behavioral data.

Authors:  Brandon M Turner; Birte U Forstmann; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Scott D Brown; Per B Sederberg; Mark Steyvers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.