Literature DB >> 25239150

Visuospatial referents facilitate the learning and transfer of mathematical operations: extending the role of the angular gyrus.

Aryn Pyke1, Shawn Betts, Jon M Fincham, John R Anderson.   

Abstract

Different external representations for learning and solving mathematical operations may affect learning and transfer. To explore the effects of learning representations, learners were each introduced to two new operations (b↑n and b↓n) via either formulas or graphical representations. Both groups became adept at solving regular (trained) problems. During transfer, no external formulas or graphs were present; however, graph learners' knowledge could allow them to mentally associate problem expressions with visuospatial referents. The angular gyrus (AG) has recently been hypothesized to map problems to mental referents (e.g., symbolic answers; Grabner, Ansari, Koschutnig, Reishofer, & Ebner Human Brain Mapping, 34, 1013-1024, 2013), and we sought to test this hypothesis for visuospatial referents. To determine whether the AG and other math (horizontal intraparietal sulcus) and visuospatial (fusiform and posterior superior parietal lobule [PSPL]) regions were implicated in processing visuospatial mental referents, we included two types of transfer problems, computational and relational, which differed in referential load (one graph vs. two). During solving, the activations in AG, PSPL, and fusiform reflected the referential load manipulation among graph but not formula learners. Furthermore, the AG was more active among graph learners overall, which is consistent with its hypothesized referential role. Behavioral performance was comparable across the groups on computational transfer problems, which could be solved in a way that incorporated learners' respective procedures for regular problems. However, graph learners were more successful on relational transfer problems, which assessed their understanding of the relations between pairs of similar problems within and across operations. On such problems, their behavioral performance correlated with activation in the AG, fusiform, and a relational processing region (BA 10).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25239150     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-014-0317-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  71 in total

1.  Learning complex arithmetic--an fMRI study.

Authors:  M Delazer; F Domahs; L Bartha; C Brenneis; A Lochy; T Trieb; T Benke
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-12

2.  Three parietal circuits for number processing.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Manuela Piazza; Philippe Pinel; Laurent Cohen
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  M Corbetta; J M Kincade; J M Ollinger; M P McAvoy; G L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children's numerical knowledge through playing number board games.

Authors:  Geetha B Ramani; Robert S Siegler
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

Review 5.  Software tools for analysis and visualization of fMRI data.

Authors:  R W Cox; J S Hyde
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1997 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Time required for judgements of numerical inequality.

Authors:  R S Moyer; T K Landauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Left, but not right, rostrolateral prefrontal cortex meets a stringent test of the relational integration hypothesis.

Authors:  Silvia A Bunge; Espen Hauk Helskog; Carter Wendelken
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain.

Authors:  Daniel Ansari
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Specialization of the rostral prefrontal cortex for distinct analogy processes.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Volle; Sam J Gilbert; Roland G Benoit; Paul W Burgess
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Individual differences in solving arithmetic word problems.

Authors:  Sabrina Zarnhofer; Verena Braunstein; Franz Ebner; Karl Koschutnig; Christa Neuper; Manuel Ninaus; Gernot Reishofer; Anja Ischebeck
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.759

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Effects of Long-term Abacus Training on Topological Properties of Brain Functional Networks.

Authors:  Jian Weng; Ye Xie; Chunjie Wang; Feiyan Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.