Literature DB >> 21584728

Long-term impacts of genome-enabled selection.

Nanye Long1, Daniel Gianola, Guilherme J M Rosa, Kent A Weigel.   

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate the effects of directional selection based on estimated genomic breeding values (GEBVs) for a quantitative trait. Selection affects GEBV prediction accuracy as well as genetic architecture via changes in allelic frequencies and linkage disequilibrium (LD), and the resulting changes are different from those in the absence of selection. How marker density affects long-term GEBV accuracy and selection response needs to be understood as well. Simulations were used to characterize the impact of selection based on GEBVs over generations. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker effects were estimated with the Bayesian Lasso method in the base generation, and these estimates were used to calculate the GEBVs in subsequent generations. GEBV accuracy decreased over generations of selection, and it was lower than under random selection, where a decay took place as well. In the long term, selection response tended to reach a plateau, but, at higher marker density, both the magnitude and duration of the response were larger. Selection changed quantitative trait loci (QTL) allele frequencies and generated new but unfavorable LD for prediction. Family effects had a considerable contribution to GEBV accuracy in early generations of selection.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21584728     DOI: 10.1007/s13353-011-0053-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Genet        ISSN: 1234-1983            Impact factor:   3.240


  19 in total

1.  The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Beatriz Villanueva; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing.

Authors:  Theo Meuwissen; Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values.

Authors:  D Habier; R L Fernando; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response.

Authors:  Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Hugo Naya; Daniel Gianola; José Crossa; Andrés Legarra; Eduardo Manfredi; Kent Weigel; José Miguel Cotes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Maintaining evolvability.

Authors:  James F Crow
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

7.  Genomic selection using different marker types and densities.

Authors:  T R Solberg; A K Sonesson; J A Woolliams; T H E Meuwissen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 8.  Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future.

Authors:  Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Understanding and using quantitative genetic variation.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Extent and consistency of linkage disequilibrium and identification of DNA markers for production and egg quality traits in commercial layer chicken populations.

Authors:  Behnam Abasht; Erin Sandford; Jesus Arango; Petek Settar; Janet E Fulton; Neil P O'Sullivan; Abebe Hassen; David Habier; Rohan L Fernando; Jack C M Dekkers; Susan J Lamont
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Causal Meaning of Genomic Predictors and How It Affects Construction and Comparison of Genome-Enabled Selection Models.

Authors:  Bruno D Valente; Gota Morota; Francisco Peñagaricano; Daniel Gianola; Kent Weigel; Guilherme J M Rosa
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.562

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.