Literature DB >> 21583655

(E)-2-(2-Nitro-ethen-yl)furan.

Pedro Valerga, M Carmen Puerta, Zenaida Rodríguez Negrín, Nilo Castañedo Cancio, Miguel Palma Lovillo.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(6)H(5)NO(3), was synthesized via condensation of furfural with nitro-methane in the presence of isobutyl-amine. The compound crystallizes exclusively as the E isomer. The angle between the mean planes of the furan ring and the nitro-alkenyl group is 1.3 (2)°.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583655      PMCID: PMC2977326          DOI: 10.1107/S160053680902861X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background, see: Wang et al. (2009 ▶); An et al. (2007 ▶); Rastogi et al. (2006 ▶); Rao et al. (2005 ▶); Negrín et al. (2002 ▶, 2003 ▶); Vallejosa et al. (2005 ▶). For related structures, see: Martínez-Bescos et al. (2008 ▶); Novoa-de-Armas et al. (1997 ▶); Pomes et al. (1995 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H5NO3 M = 139.11 Monoclinic, a = 9.0374 (18) Å b = 5.2012 (10) Å c = 13.027 (3) Å β = 97.58 (3)° V = 607.0 (2) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.13 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.47 × 0.17 × 0.14 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004 ▶) T min = 0.916, T max = 0.980 4852 measured reflections 1387 independent reflections 1317 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.023

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.041 wR(F 2) = 0.107 S = 1.06 1387 reflections 91 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.25 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.28 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680902861X/fj2237sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680902861X/fj2237Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H5NO3F(000) = 288
Mr = 139.11Dx = 1.522 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 2396 reflections
a = 9.0374 (18) Åθ = 2.6–27.5°
b = 5.2012 (10) ŵ = 0.13 mm1
c = 13.027 (3) ÅT = 100 K
β = 97.58 (3)°Prism, yellow
V = 607.0 (2) Å30.47 × 0.17 × 0.14 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART APEX diffractometer1387 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1317 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.023
1700 ω scan frames (0.3°, 10)θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004)h = −11→11
Tmin = 0.916, Tmax = 0.980k = −6→6
4852 measured reflectionsl = −16→12
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: full0 constraints
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.107w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0569P)2 + 0.266P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1387 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.25 e Å3
91 parametersΔρmin = −0.28 e Å3
Experimental. Refinement of F2 against unique set of reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R– factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against unique set of reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.67495 (10)0.19614 (17)0.08110 (7)0.0206 (2)
O20.15283 (11)0.49888 (19)0.10417 (8)0.0290 (3)
O30.16242 (10)0.13012 (19)0.18291 (7)0.0254 (3)
N10.21943 (12)0.3007 (2)0.13567 (8)0.0205 (3)
C10.59854 (14)0.0119 (2)0.12894 (9)0.0182 (3)
C20.68866 (14)−0.1941 (2)0.15531 (9)0.0202 (3)
H20.6627−0.34650.18900.024*
C30.82904 (14)−0.1370 (3)0.12270 (10)0.0221 (3)
H30.9152−0.24350.13000.027*
C40.81535 (14)0.0996 (3)0.07909 (10)0.0227 (3)
H40.89300.18700.05080.027*
C50.44755 (13)0.0618 (2)0.14455 (9)0.0185 (3)
H50.3974−0.06670.17870.022*
C60.37162 (14)0.2755 (3)0.11477 (10)0.0197 (3)
H60.41720.40900.08030.024*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0179 (4)0.0200 (5)0.0243 (5)0.0009 (3)0.0046 (3)0.0019 (3)
O20.0269 (5)0.0301 (5)0.0303 (5)0.0112 (4)0.0053 (4)0.0047 (4)
O30.0206 (5)0.0269 (5)0.0299 (5)−0.0014 (4)0.0074 (4)0.0019 (4)
N10.0189 (5)0.0244 (6)0.0182 (5)0.0026 (4)0.0023 (4)−0.0017 (4)
C10.0199 (6)0.0185 (6)0.0163 (6)−0.0013 (4)0.0027 (4)−0.0017 (4)
C20.0221 (6)0.0199 (6)0.0186 (6)0.0006 (5)0.0019 (5)−0.0010 (5)
C30.0201 (6)0.0256 (6)0.0204 (6)0.0042 (5)0.0016 (5)−0.0025 (5)
C40.0164 (6)0.0279 (7)0.0242 (6)0.0007 (5)0.0040 (5)−0.0011 (5)
C50.0185 (6)0.0212 (6)0.0159 (6)−0.0021 (5)0.0028 (4)−0.0023 (4)
C60.0170 (6)0.0236 (6)0.0194 (6)0.0002 (5)0.0052 (4)−0.0013 (5)
O1—C41.3680 (15)C2—H20.9500
O1—C11.3772 (15)C3—C41.3544 (19)
O2—N11.2361 (14)C3—H30.9500
O3—N11.2309 (15)C4—H40.9500
N1—C61.4428 (16)C5—C61.3366 (18)
C1—C21.3623 (17)C5—H50.9500
C1—C51.4296 (17)C6—H60.9500
C2—C31.4214 (18)
C4—O1—C1105.97 (10)C4—C3—H3126.9
O3—N1—O2123.33 (11)C2—C3—H3126.9
O3—N1—C6120.08 (11)C3—C4—O1111.04 (12)
O2—N1—C6116.59 (11)C3—C4—H4124.5
C2—C1—O1110.03 (11)O1—C4—H4124.5
C2—C1—C5131.07 (12)C6—C5—C1124.94 (12)
O1—C1—C5118.89 (11)C6—C5—H5117.5
C1—C2—C3106.73 (11)C1—C5—H5117.5
C1—C2—H2126.6C5—C6—N1119.11 (12)
C3—C2—H2126.6C5—C6—H6120.4
C4—C3—C2106.23 (11)N1—C6—H6120.4
C4—O1—C1—C2−0.39 (13)C1—O1—C4—C30.54 (14)
C4—O1—C1—C5178.58 (10)C2—C1—C5—C6179.68 (13)
O1—C1—C2—C30.12 (14)O1—C1—C5—C60.96 (18)
C5—C1—C2—C3−178.69 (12)C1—C5—C6—N1−179.91 (11)
C1—C2—C3—C40.21 (14)O3—N1—C6—C52.03 (17)
C2—C3—C4—O1−0.47 (14)O2—N1—C6—C5−178.15 (11)
  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Heteroarylisopropylamines as MAO inhibitors.

Authors:  Gabriel Vallejos; Angélica Fierro; Marcos Caroli Rezende; Silvia Sepúlveda-Boza; Miguel Reyes-Parada
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Synthesis and anticancer activity studies of alpha-aminoalkylated conjugated nitroalkenes.

Authors:  Namrata Rastogi; Renu Mohan; Dulal Panda; Shaikh M Mobin; Irishi N N Namboothiri
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Synthesis, structure, and E-Z isomerization of beta-(hetero)aryl-alpha-nitro-alpha,beta-enals.

Authors:  Patricia Martínez-Bescos; Fernando Cagide-Fagín; Luis F Roa; Juan Carlos Ortiz-Lara; Krzysztof Kierus; Lidia Ozores-Viturro; Marta Fernández-González; Ricardo Alonso
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 4.354

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.