Literature DB >> 21583226

2-Methyl-4-nitro-phenol.

Sheng Bi, Yong-Zhong Wu, Yi-Xin Zhou, Jian-Guo Tang, Cheng Guo.   

Abstract

The mol-ecule of the title compound, C(7)H(7)NO(3), is nearly planar [maximum deviation 0.112 (3) Å for one of the notro O atoms]. In the crystal structure, inter-molecular O-H⋯O and C-H⋯O inter-actions link the mol-ecules into a three-dimensional network.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583226      PMCID: PMC2969836          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809018716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For a related structure, see: Ahmed & Ashwini (2004 ▶). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H7NO3 M = 153.14 Monoclinic, a = 5.6210 (11) Å b = 8.7420 (17) Å> c = 14.300 (3) Å β = 100.71 (3)° V = 690.4 (2) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.12 mm−1 T = 294 K 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968 ▶) T min = 0.966, T max = 0.988 1378 measured reflections 1245 independent reflections 870 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.027 3 standard reflections frequency: 120 min intensity decay: 1%

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.054 wR(F 2) = 0.181 S = 1.01 1245 reflections 102 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.25 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.24 e Å−3 Data collection: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1989 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 Software; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809018716/hk2688sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809018716/hk2688Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H7NO3F(000) = 320
Mr = 153.14Dx = 1.473 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 5.6210 (11) Åθ = 9–13°
b = 8.7420 (17) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
c = 14.300 (3) ÅT = 294 K
β = 100.71 (3)°Block, colorless
V = 690.4 (2) Å30.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer870 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.027
graphiteθmax = 25.3°, θmin = 2.7°
ω/2θ scansh = 0→6
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968)k = 0→10
Tmin = 0.966, Tmax = 0.988l = −17→16
1378 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 120 min
1245 independent reflections intensity decay: 1%
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.054H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.181w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.08P)2 + 0.74P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.01(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1245 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.25 e Å3
102 parametersΔρmin = −0.24 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.017 (4)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O1−0.3440 (5)0.6807 (3)0.9304 (2)0.0769 (9)
O2−0.0576 (5)0.7542 (3)0.8605 (2)0.0682 (8)
O30.0480 (4)0.0536 (3)0.81980 (17)0.0567 (7)
H3A−0.0372−0.00790.84170.085*
N−0.1770 (5)0.6536 (3)0.8896 (2)0.0490 (8)
C10.0652 (6)0.4640 (4)0.8248 (2)0.0478 (9)
H1A0.15250.54290.80340.057*
C20.1146 (6)0.3143 (4)0.8076 (2)0.0487 (9)
H2A0.23520.29080.77340.058*
C3−0.0137 (6)0.1979 (4)0.8410 (2)0.0417 (8)
C4−0.1941 (5)0.2284 (3)0.8932 (2)0.0410 (8)
C5−0.2457 (6)0.3796 (4)0.9085 (2)0.0415 (8)
H5A−0.36780.40380.94180.050*
C6−0.1175 (5)0.4950 (4)0.8747 (2)0.0413 (8)
C7−0.3278 (6)0.1019 (4)0.9313 (3)0.0531 (9)
H7A−0.21430.03600.97070.080*
H7B−0.41720.04410.87930.080*
H7C−0.43750.14430.96840.080*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.093 (2)0.0485 (16)0.104 (2)0.0137 (14)0.0576 (18)−0.0051 (15)
O20.0861 (19)0.0303 (13)0.097 (2)−0.0030 (12)0.0392 (16)0.0063 (13)
O30.0661 (15)0.0341 (13)0.0802 (17)0.0000 (11)0.0405 (13)−0.0053 (11)
N0.0594 (18)0.0337 (15)0.0567 (17)0.0039 (13)0.0180 (14)0.0005 (13)
C10.0539 (19)0.0371 (17)0.059 (2)−0.0036 (14)0.0281 (17)0.0044 (15)
C20.0496 (19)0.0413 (18)0.063 (2)−0.0036 (15)0.0302 (17)−0.0024 (16)
C30.0438 (17)0.0339 (15)0.0503 (18)−0.0019 (14)0.0168 (14)−0.0029 (14)
C40.0389 (16)0.0397 (17)0.0473 (18)−0.0032 (13)0.0156 (14)−0.0012 (14)
C50.0403 (16)0.0407 (17)0.0469 (17)0.0021 (14)0.0171 (14)0.0005 (14)
C60.0461 (17)0.0312 (16)0.0500 (18)0.0009 (13)0.0177 (14)−0.0006 (13)
C70.054 (2)0.045 (2)0.068 (2)−0.0034 (15)0.0285 (17)0.0007 (16)
O3—C31.357 (4)C2—H2A0.9300
O3—H3A0.8200C3—C41.393 (4)
N—O11.217 (3)C4—C51.379 (4)
N—O21.225 (4)C4—C71.496 (4)
N—C61.451 (4)C5—C61.379 (4)
C1—C21.370 (5)C5—H5A0.9300
C1—C61.382 (4)C7—H7A0.9600
C1—H1A0.9300C7—H7B0.9600
C2—C31.382 (4)C7—H7C0.9600
C3—O3—H3A109.5C5—C4—C7121.1 (3)
O1—N—O2122.9 (3)C3—C4—C7121.2 (3)
O1—N—C6118.4 (3)C6—C5—C4120.5 (3)
O2—N—C6118.7 (3)C6—C5—H5A119.8
C2—C1—C6118.4 (3)C4—C5—H5A119.8
C2—C1—H1A120.8C5—C6—C1121.6 (3)
C6—C1—H1A120.8C5—C6—N119.9 (3)
C1—C2—C3120.4 (3)C1—C6—N118.5 (3)
C1—C2—H2A119.8C4—C7—H7A109.5
C3—C2—H2A119.8C4—C7—H7B109.5
O3—C3—C2115.9 (3)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
O3—C3—C4122.7 (3)C4—C7—H7C109.5
C2—C3—C4121.5 (3)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C5—C4—C3117.7 (3)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
O1—N—C6—C5−1.5 (5)O3—C3—C4—C5−178.4 (3)
O2—N—C6—C5178.6 (3)C2—C3—C4—C51.8 (5)
O1—N—C6—C1177.3 (3)O3—C3—C4—C71.4 (5)
O2—N—C6—C1−2.6 (5)C2—C3—C4—C7−178.3 (3)
C6—C1—C2—C3−1.0 (5)C3—C4—C5—C6−1.5 (5)
C2—C1—C6—C51.2 (5)C7—C4—C5—C6178.6 (3)
C2—C1—C6—N−177.5 (3)C4—C5—C6—C10.0 (5)
C1—C2—C3—O3179.7 (3)C4—C5—C6—N178.8 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.5 (5)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3A···O2i0.822.102.770 (4)138
C7—H7C···O1ii0.962.573.505 (5)165
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O3—H3A⋯O2i0.822.102.770 (4)138
C7—H7C⋯O1ii0.962.573.505 (5)165

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  2 in total

1.  An efficient and facile nitration of phenols with nitric acid/zinc chloride under ultrasonic conditions.

Authors:  Ahmed Kamal; B Ashwini Kumar; M Arifuddin; Midoux Patrick
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.491

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  2-Amino-4-nitro-phenol monohydrate.

Authors:  Hasan Tanak; Ferda Erşahin; Metin Yavuz; Orhan Büyükgüngör
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-09-11

2.  2-Amino-4-nitro-phenol-1-(2,4,6-trihy-droxy-phen-yl)ethanone (1/1).

Authors:  Can Kocabıyık; Hümeyra Paşaoğlu; Taşkın Basılı; Erbil Ağar
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-04-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.