Literature DB >> 21582637

(±)-2-Oxocyclo-penta-neacetic acid: catemeric hydrogen bonding in a γ-keto acid.

Georgia Efthimiopoulos1, Markos M Papadakis, Hugh W Thompson, Roger A Lalancette.   

Abstract

The title racemate, C(7)H(10)O(3), aggregates in the solid as acid-to-ketone n class="Chemical">hydrogen-bonding catemers [O⋯O = 2.7050 (13) Å and O-H⋯O = 166.1 (17)°] having glide-related components. Four such heterochiral chains, paired centrosymmetrically about (, , ) in the cell, proceed through the cell in the 010 direction, with alignment with respect to the c axis of ++--.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21582637      PMCID: PMC2969029          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809010708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to catemers and hydrogen bonds, see: Barcon et al. (1998 ▶, 2002 ▶); Coté et al. (1996 ▶); DeVita Dufort et al. (2007 ▶); Efthimiopoulos et al. (2009 ▶); Harata et al. (1977 ▶); Lalancette & Thompson (2003 ▶); Lalancette et al. (2006 ▶); Malak et al. (2006 ▶); n class="Chemical">Newman et al. (2002 ▶); Steiner (1997 ▶); Stork et al. (1963 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H10O3 M = 142.15 Orthorhombic, a = 5.3232 (1) Å b = 12.2981 (3) Å c = 20.8148 (5) Å V = 1362.65 (5) Å3 Z = 8 Cu Kα radiation μ = 0.91 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.37 × 0.15 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD APEXII area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a ▶) T min = 0.730, T max = 0.915 9810 measured reflections 1197 independent reflections 1147 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.016

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.033 wR(F 2) = 0.086 S = 1.04 1197 reflections 95 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.26 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006 ▶); cell refinement: SAIn class="Chemical">NT (Bruker, 2006 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008b ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809010708/fl2241sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809010708/fl2241Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H10O3Dx = 1.386 Mg m3
Mr = 142.15Melting point: 327 K
Orthorhombic, PbcaCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 7778 reflections
a = 5.3232 (1) Åθ = 4.3–67.1°
b = 12.2981 (3) ŵ = 0.91 mm1
c = 20.8148 (5) ÅT = 100 K
V = 1362.65 (5) Å3Needle, colourless
Z = 80.37 × 0.15 × 0.10 mm
F(000) = 608
Bruker SMART CCD APEXII area-detector diffractometer1197 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1147 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.016
φ and ω scansθmax = 67.0°, θmin = 4.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a)h = −6→6
Tmin = 0.730, Tmax = 0.915k = −14→14
9810 measured reflectionsl = −24→24
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.086w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0444P)2 + 0.8053P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1197 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.26 e Å3
95 parametersΔρmin = −0.15 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0014 (4)
Experimental. Crystal mounted on a Cryoloop using Paratone-N
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O11.12228 (17)0.12579 (7)0.31120 (4)0.0196 (3)
C10.7561 (2)0.03606 (10)0.35627 (6)0.0156 (3)
H10.61380.07860.33750.019*
C20.9814 (2)0.11135 (10)0.35642 (6)0.0156 (3)
O21.16880 (17)−0.11081 (7)0.37021 (4)0.0205 (3)
O31.00596 (18)−0.22599 (7)0.29778 (4)0.0193 (3)
H31.131 (4)−0.2640 (14)0.3061 (8)0.029*
C30.9997 (2)0.16595 (11)0.42143 (6)0.0209 (3)
H3A1.00870.24600.41670.025*
H3B1.15050.14070.44490.025*
C40.7603 (3)0.13271 (11)0.45681 (6)0.0213 (3)
H4A0.62380.18580.44920.026*
H4B0.79050.12680.50360.026*
C50.6948 (2)0.02124 (11)0.42777 (6)0.0192 (3)
H5A0.7984−0.03710.44700.023*
H5B0.51500.00370.43410.023*
C60.7852 (2)−0.06445 (10)0.31485 (6)0.0154 (3)
H6A0.6307−0.10880.31860.018*
H6B0.8010−0.04150.26940.018*
C71.0077 (2)−0.13453 (10)0.33180 (6)0.0142 (3)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0220 (5)0.0169 (5)0.0198 (5)−0.0025 (4)0.0027 (4)0.0010 (3)
C10.0140 (6)0.0151 (6)0.0176 (6)0.0018 (5)−0.0010 (5)0.0005 (5)
C20.0164 (6)0.0123 (6)0.0180 (6)0.0026 (5)−0.0013 (5)0.0027 (5)
O20.0191 (5)0.0196 (5)0.0228 (5)0.0020 (4)−0.0054 (4)−0.0024 (4)
O30.0194 (5)0.0143 (5)0.0241 (5)0.0027 (4)−0.0031 (4)−0.0034 (3)
C30.0230 (7)0.0206 (7)0.0192 (7)−0.0038 (5)−0.0008 (5)−0.0026 (5)
C40.0227 (7)0.0220 (7)0.0191 (7)0.0001 (5)0.0015 (5)−0.0034 (5)
C50.0182 (6)0.0200 (6)0.0192 (6)−0.0015 (5)0.0036 (5)−0.0013 (5)
C60.0148 (6)0.0150 (6)0.0163 (6)−0.0014 (5)−0.0011 (5)0.0002 (5)
C70.0150 (6)0.0134 (6)0.0141 (6)−0.0026 (5)0.0028 (5)0.0020 (4)
O1—C21.2165 (15)C3—H3A0.9900
C1—C21.5150 (17)C3—H3B0.9900
C1—C61.5150 (16)C4—C51.5383 (18)
C1—C51.5345 (17)C4—H4A0.9900
C1—H11.0000C4—H4B0.9900
C2—C31.5138 (17)C5—H5A0.9900
O2—C71.2082 (15)C5—H5B0.9900
O3—C71.3292 (15)C6—C71.5066 (17)
O3—H30.832 (19)C6—H6A0.9900
C3—C41.5276 (18)C6—H6B0.9900
C2—C1—C6114.76 (10)C3—C4—H4B111.0
C2—C1—C5103.82 (10)C5—C4—H4B111.0
C6—C1—C5118.47 (10)H4A—C4—H4B109.0
C2—C1—H1106.3C1—C5—C4103.12 (10)
C6—C1—H1106.3C1—C5—H5A111.1
C5—C1—H1106.3C4—C5—H5A111.1
O1—C2—C3125.94 (11)C1—C5—H5B111.1
O1—C2—C1125.14 (11)C4—C5—H5B111.1
C3—C2—C1108.91 (10)H5A—C5—H5B109.1
C7—O3—H3111.1 (12)C7—C6—C1114.45 (10)
C2—C3—C4104.97 (10)C7—C6—H6A108.6
C2—C3—H3A110.8C1—C6—H6A108.6
C4—C3—H3A110.8C7—C6—H6B108.6
C2—C3—H3B110.8C1—C6—H6B108.6
C4—C3—H3B110.8H6A—C6—H6B107.6
H3A—C3—H3B108.8O2—C7—O3124.18 (11)
C3—C4—C5103.78 (10)O2—C7—C6125.09 (11)
C3—C4—H4A111.0O3—C7—C6110.72 (10)
C5—C4—H4A111.0
C6—C1—C2—O132.63 (17)C2—C1—C5—C434.53 (12)
C5—C1—C2—O1163.49 (12)C6—C1—C5—C4163.15 (11)
C6—C1—C2—C3−147.97 (11)C3—C4—C5—C1−39.41 (12)
C5—C1—C2—C3−17.11 (13)C2—C1—C6—C757.31 (14)
O1—C2—C3—C4172.13 (12)C5—C1—C6—C7−66.02 (14)
C1—C2—C3—C4−7.26 (13)C1—C6—C7—O2−7.31 (18)
C2—C3—C4—C528.73 (13)C1—C6—C7—O3173.81 (10)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3···O1i0.832 (19)1.890 (19)2.7050 (13)166.1 (17)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O3—H3⋯O1i0.832 (19)1.890 (19)2.7050 (13)166.1 (17)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  7 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  1'-Acetylferrocene-1-carboxylic acid: an instance of hydrogen bonding in the rare dimeric acid-to-ketone mode.

Authors:  Jacob M Newman; Markos M Papadakis; Hugh W Thompson; Roger A Lalancette
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2002-01-23       Impact factor: 1.172

3.  (+/-)-3-Oxocyclopentanecarboxylic acid: The smallest keto acid known to aggregate by catemeric hydrogen bonding.

Authors:  Muhammad H Malak; Daniel Baker; Andrew P J Brunskill; Hugh W Thompson; Roger A Lalancette
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 1.172

4.  (+/-)-3-Oxocyclohexanecarboxylic and -acetic acids: contrasting hydrogen-bonding patterns in two homologous keto acids.

Authors:  Alan Barcon; Andrew P J Brunskill; Roger A Lalancette; Hugh W Thompson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2002-02-13       Impact factor: 1.172

5.  3-Oxo-5beta-24-norcholanic acid: acid-to-acid hydrogen-bonding catemers employing the rare anti carboxyl conformation in the aggregation of a steroid keto acid.

Authors:  Marisa DeVita Dufort; Mark Davison; Roger A Lalancette; Hugh W Thompson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  3-Oxocyclo-butane-carboxylic acid: hydrogen bonding in a small-ring γ-keto acid.

Authors:  Georgia Efthimiopoulos; Hugh W Thompson; Roger A Lalancette
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-02-11

7.  (+/-)-cis-2-Methyl-4-oxocyclohexanecarboxylic acid: catemeric hydrogen bonding in a delta-keto acid derived from Hagemann's ester.

Authors:  Roger A Lalancette; Hugh W Thompson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2003-11-08       Impact factor: 1.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.