Literature DB >> 21578788

2-Hydr-oxy-5-nitro-benzaldehyde.

Hasan Tanak, Mustafa Macit, Metin Yavuz, Samil Işık.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(7)H(5)NO(4), is essentially planar, with a maximum deviation from the mean plane of 0.0116 (11) Å for the hydr-oxy O atom. The mol-ecular and crystal structure are stabilized by intra- and inter-molecular inter-actions. An intra-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bond generates a six-membered ring, producing an S(6) ring motif. The C-H⋯O inter-actions result in the formation of C(5) chains and R(2) (2)(8) rings forming an approximately planar network parallel to (10). These planes are inter-connected through π-π inter-actions [centroid-centroid distance 3.582 (2) Å].

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21578788      PMCID: PMC2971860          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809046807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

Nitro­aromatics are widely used as inter­mediates in explosives, dyestuffs, pesticides and organic synthesis, see: Yan et al. (2006 ▶). They occur in industrial wastes and as direct pollutants in the environment and are relatively soluble in water and detecta­ble in rivers, ponds and soil, see: Yan et al. (2006 ▶); Soojhawon et al. (2005 ▶). Aromatic compounds with multiple nitro substituents are known to be resistant to electrophilic attack by oxygenases, see: Halas et al. (1983 ▶). For comparison bond lengths and angles in related structures, see: Rizal et al. (2008 ▶); Garden et al. (2004 ▶). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H5NO4 M = 167.12 Monoclinic, a = 7.2580 (17) Å b = 8.3960 (13) Å c = 11.704 (3) Å β = 95.165 (18)° V = 710.3 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.13 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.54 × 0.28 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Stoe IPDS II diffractometer Absorption correction: integration (X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2002 ▶) T min = 0.979, T max = 0.992 4345 measured reflections 1396 independent reflections 944 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.062

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.050 wR(F 2) = 0.119 S = 1.06 1396 reflections 112 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.16 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3 Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2002 ▶); cell refinement: X-AREA; data reduction: X-RED32 (Stoe & Cie, 2002 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809046807/dn2510sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809046807/dn2510Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H5NO4F(000) = 344
Mr = 167.12Dx = 1.563 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 8368 reflections
a = 7.2580 (17) Åθ = 1.8–27.3°
b = 8.3960 (13) ŵ = 0.13 mm1
c = 11.704 (3) ÅT = 296 K
β = 95.165 (18)°Prism., red
V = 710.3 (3) Å30.54 × 0.28 × 0.15 mm
Z = 4
Stoe IPDS II diffractometer1396 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube944 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.062
Detector resolution: 6.67 pixels mm-1θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 3.0°
rotation method scansh = −8→8
Absorption correction: integration (X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2002)k = −10→10
Tmin = 0.979, Tmax = 0.992l = −14→14
4345 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.119H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.05P)2 + 0.0581P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1396 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
112 parametersΔρmax = 0.16 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.15 e Å3
Experimental. 168 frames, detector distance = 120 mm
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.4340 (3)−0.1006 (2)0.25586 (14)0.0788 (6)
O20.3658 (3)−0.3022 (2)0.15003 (16)0.0819 (6)
O30.1019 (3)0.2346 (2)−0.19209 (14)0.0702 (6)
H3A0.130 (4)0.336 (4)−0.162 (3)0.105*
O40.2251 (3)0.4736 (2)−0.06415 (16)0.0895 (7)
N10.3709 (3)−0.1591 (2)0.16564 (16)0.0524 (5)
C10.3019 (3)−0.0545 (2)0.07198 (17)0.0425 (5)
C20.2232 (3)−0.1209 (2)−0.03011 (17)0.0459 (5)
H20.2154−0.2309−0.03850.055*
C30.1574 (3)−0.0228 (3)−0.11799 (18)0.0494 (5)
H30.1037−0.0659−0.18630.059*
C40.1711 (3)0.1417 (2)−0.10464 (18)0.0471 (5)
C50.2551 (3)0.2073 (2)−0.00295 (17)0.0437 (5)
C60.3190 (3)0.1067 (2)0.08585 (17)0.0431 (5)
H60.37300.14850.15440.052*
C70.2771 (3)0.3784 (3)0.0104 (2)0.0631 (7)
H70.33380.41720.07920.076*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.1123 (15)0.0673 (12)0.0522 (10)−0.0024 (11)−0.0171 (10)0.0069 (9)
O20.1202 (16)0.0391 (10)0.0829 (13)0.0026 (9)−0.0101 (11)0.0101 (8)
O30.0914 (13)0.0556 (11)0.0590 (11)0.0048 (9)−0.0195 (9)0.0061 (8)
O40.1338 (17)0.0423 (10)0.0871 (14)0.0022 (11)−0.0199 (12)0.0094 (9)
N10.0593 (11)0.0433 (12)0.0547 (11)−0.0005 (9)0.0047 (9)0.0071 (9)
C10.0418 (11)0.0382 (12)0.0475 (12)−0.0002 (9)0.0041 (9)0.0023 (9)
C20.0486 (12)0.0355 (10)0.0535 (12)−0.0007 (9)0.0046 (9)−0.0025 (9)
C30.0526 (12)0.0492 (13)0.0453 (12)−0.0032 (10)−0.0013 (9)−0.0086 (10)
C40.0463 (11)0.0458 (13)0.0480 (12)0.0029 (9)−0.0018 (9)0.0028 (10)
C50.0468 (11)0.0366 (11)0.0470 (12)−0.0014 (9)0.0007 (9)−0.0008 (9)
C60.0457 (11)0.0418 (12)0.0413 (11)−0.0031 (9)0.0009 (9)−0.0049 (9)
C70.0805 (17)0.0424 (13)0.0643 (15)−0.0020 (12)−0.0045 (12)−0.0008 (12)
O1—N11.216 (2)C2—H20.9300
O2—N11.215 (2)C3—C41.392 (3)
O3—C41.348 (2)C3—H30.9300
O3—H3A0.93 (3)C4—C51.401 (3)
O4—C71.218 (3)C5—C61.386 (3)
N1—C11.458 (3)C5—C71.452 (3)
C1—C61.367 (3)C6—H60.9300
C1—C21.394 (3)C7—H70.9300
C2—C31.370 (3)
C4—O3—H3A100.5 (19)O3—C4—C3118.12 (19)
O2—N1—O1122.27 (19)O3—C4—C5121.43 (19)
O2—N1—C1118.59 (19)C3—C4—C5120.45 (19)
O1—N1—C1119.13 (18)C6—C5—C4119.19 (18)
C6—C1—C2121.56 (19)C6—C5—C7119.77 (19)
C6—C1—N1119.05 (18)C4—C5—C7121.04 (19)
C2—C1—N1119.38 (18)C1—C6—C5119.59 (19)
C3—C2—C1119.5 (2)C1—C6—H6120.2
C3—C2—H2120.3C5—C6—H6120.2
C1—C2—H2120.3O4—C7—C5123.3 (2)
C2—C3—C4119.71 (19)O4—C7—H7118.4
C2—C3—H3120.1C5—C7—H7118.4
C4—C3—H3120.1
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C2—H2···O4i0.932.503.427 (3)175
C6—H6···O3ii0.932.533.433 (3)163
C7—H7···O2iii0.932.503.176 (3)130
O3—H3A···O40.93 (3)1.73 (3)2.613 (3)157 (3)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C2—H2⋯O4i 0.932.503.427 (3)175
C6—H6⋯O3ii 0.932.533.433 (3)163
C7—H7⋯O2iii 0.932.503.176 (3)130
O3—H3A⋯O40.93 (3)1.73 (3)2.613 (3)157 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  5 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  4-Hydr-oxy-3-nitro-benzaldehyde.

Authors:  Mohd Razali Rizal; Isha Azizul; Seik Weng Ng
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-04-26

3.  Microbial transformation of nitroaromatic compounds in sewage effluent.

Authors:  L E Hallas; M Alexander
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Three-dimensional aggregation in 2-hydroxy-3-iodo-5-nitrobenzaldehyde involving C-H...O, iodo-nitro and aromatic pi-pi stacking interactions, and isolated dimers in disordered 2,4-diiodo-6-nitroanisole.

Authors:  Simon J Garden; Fernando R da Cunha; Christopher Glidewell; John N Low; Janet M S Skakle; James L Wardell
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 1.172

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  2-Amino-4-nitro-phenol monohydrate.

Authors:  Hasan Tanak; Ferda Erşahin; Metin Yavuz; Orhan Büyükgüngör
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-09-11

2.  2-Amino-4-nitro-phenol-1-(2,4,6-trihy-droxy-phen-yl)ethanone (1/1).

Authors:  Can Kocabıyık; Hümeyra Paşaoğlu; Taşkın Basılı; Erbil Ağar
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-04-25

3.  Cystal structre of 5-hy-droxy-2-nitro-benzaldehyde.

Authors:  Huma Bano; Sammer Yousuf
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2015-04-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.