Literature DB >> 21577642

4-Methyl-benzaldehyde thio-semi-carbazone.

Jian Zhang1, Hao Geng, Ling-Hua Zhuang, Guo-Wei Wang.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(9)H(11)N(3)S, was prepared by reacting 4-methyl-benzaldehyde with thio-semicarbazide. An intra-molecular N-H⋯N hydrogen bond helps to establish the observed mol-ecular conformation. The crystal packing is realized by inter-molecular N-H⋯S hydrogen bonds.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21577642      PMCID: PMC2969930          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809033297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background to thio­semicarbazone compounds, see: Casas et al. (2000 ▶); Tarafder et al. (2000 ▶); Ferrari et al. (2000 ▶); Deschamps et al. (2003 ▶); Maccioni et al.(2003 ▶); Chimenti et al. (2007 ▶); Zhang et al. (2009 ▶). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C9H11N3S M = 193.27 Monoclinic, a = 13.234 (3) Å b = 8.221 (2) Å c = 10.311 (2) Å β = 111.15 (3)° V = 1046.2 (4) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.27 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968 ▶) T min = 0.924, T max = 0.974 1982 measured reflections 1898 independent reflections 1322 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.032 3 standard reflections every 200 reflections intensity decay: 9%

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.052 wR(F 2) = 0.146 S = 1.00 1898 reflections 120 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.26 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 Data collection: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1989 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 Software; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809033297/im2136sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809033297/im2136Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C9H11N3SF(000) = 408
Mr = 193.27Dx = 1.227 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 27 reflections
a = 13.234 (3) Åθ = 1–25°
b = 8.221 (2) ŵ = 0.27 mm1
c = 10.311 (2) ÅT = 293 K
β = 111.15 (3)°Block, colorless
V = 1046.2 (4) Å30.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer1322 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.032
graphiteθmax = 25.3°, θmin = 1.7°
ω/2θ scansh = −15→0
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968)k = 0→9
Tmin = 0.924, Tmax = 0.974l = −11→12
1982 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 200 reflections
1898 independent reflections intensity decay: 9%
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.052H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.146w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.07P)2 + 0.38P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.00(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1898 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.26 e Å3
120 parametersΔρmin = −0.20 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.034 (4)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S0.48277 (7)0.09017 (9)0.81196 (7)0.0534 (3)
N10.34064 (18)−0.0455 (3)0.4236 (2)0.0438 (6)
C1−0.0005 (3)−0.2600 (6)−0.1894 (3)0.0788 (12)
H1B−0.0374−0.3614−0.19340.118*
H1C0.0324−0.2593−0.25850.118*
H1D−0.0514−0.1721−0.20670.118*
N20.40264 (19)−0.0458 (3)0.5647 (2)0.0456 (6)
H2A0.4275−0.13580.60650.055*
C20.0863 (3)−0.2397 (5)−0.0467 (3)0.0560 (9)
N30.3955 (2)0.2299 (3)0.5633 (3)0.0630 (8)
H3A0.36500.22630.47430.076*
H3B0.40780.32220.60540.076*
C30.1264 (3)−0.0877 (4)0.0043 (3)0.0614 (9)
H3C0.10060.0034−0.05130.074*
C40.2041 (3)−0.0681 (4)0.1365 (3)0.0553 (8)
H4A0.23020.03520.16780.066*
C50.2429 (2)−0.2018 (4)0.2222 (3)0.0445 (7)
C60.2060 (2)−0.3553 (4)0.1705 (3)0.0521 (8)
H6A0.2329−0.44650.22550.063*
C70.1289 (3)−0.3741 (4)0.0370 (3)0.0565 (9)
H7A0.1056−0.47790.00360.068*
C80.3157 (2)−0.1842 (4)0.3664 (3)0.0452 (7)
H8A0.3446−0.27700.41800.054*
C90.4235 (2)0.0939 (3)0.6353 (3)0.0420 (7)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S0.0798 (6)0.0472 (5)0.0282 (4)−0.0056 (4)0.0134 (4)−0.0039 (3)
N10.0512 (15)0.0501 (15)0.0282 (11)−0.0033 (11)0.0121 (10)−0.0016 (10)
C10.071 (2)0.116 (3)0.0399 (18)−0.014 (2)0.0086 (17)−0.015 (2)
N20.0603 (16)0.0443 (14)0.0268 (11)−0.0011 (12)0.0094 (11)−0.0010 (10)
C20.0497 (19)0.081 (2)0.0362 (16)−0.0065 (17)0.0143 (14)−0.0080 (16)
N30.100 (2)0.0425 (15)0.0339 (13)0.0016 (14)0.0082 (14)−0.0005 (11)
C30.068 (2)0.067 (2)0.0419 (17)−0.0007 (18)0.0119 (16)0.0070 (16)
C40.064 (2)0.055 (2)0.0386 (16)−0.0061 (16)0.0082 (14)−0.0039 (14)
C50.0452 (17)0.0530 (18)0.0342 (14)−0.0006 (14)0.0131 (12)−0.0056 (13)
C60.0556 (19)0.0562 (19)0.0423 (17)−0.0015 (15)0.0151 (14)−0.0060 (15)
C70.057 (2)0.066 (2)0.0451 (17)−0.0113 (16)0.0169 (15)−0.0190 (16)
C80.0516 (18)0.0476 (18)0.0332 (14)0.0002 (14)0.0115 (13)−0.0019 (13)
C90.0492 (17)0.0438 (16)0.0320 (14)−0.0015 (13)0.0135 (12)−0.0018 (13)
S—C91.704 (3)N3—H3A0.8600
N1—C81.271 (4)N3—H3B0.8600
N1—N21.389 (3)C3—C41.390 (4)
C1—C21.514 (4)C3—H3C0.9300
C1—H1B0.9600C4—C51.387 (4)
C1—H1C0.9600C4—H4A0.9300
C1—H1D0.9600C5—C61.388 (4)
N2—C91.334 (3)C5—C81.458 (4)
N2—H2A0.8600C6—C71.395 (4)
C2—C31.385 (5)C6—H6A0.9300
C2—C71.390 (5)C7—H7A0.9300
N3—C91.319 (3)C8—H8A0.9300
C8—N1—N2116.1 (2)C5—C4—C3120.4 (3)
C2—C1—H1B109.5C5—C4—H4A119.8
C2—C1—H1C109.5C3—C4—H4A119.8
H1B—C1—H1C109.5C4—C5—C6118.5 (3)
C2—C1—H1D109.5C4—C5—C8121.9 (3)
H1B—C1—H1D109.5C6—C5—C8119.5 (3)
H1C—C1—H1D109.5C5—C6—C7120.7 (3)
C9—N2—N1119.9 (2)C5—C6—H6A119.7
C9—N2—H2A120.1C7—C6—H6A119.7
N1—N2—H2A120.1C2—C7—C6120.8 (3)
C3—C2—C7117.9 (3)C2—C7—H7A119.6
C3—C2—C1121.4 (3)C6—C7—H7A119.6
C7—C2—C1120.8 (3)N1—C8—C5121.8 (3)
C9—N3—H3A120.0N1—C8—H8A119.1
C9—N3—H3B120.0C5—C8—H8A119.1
H3A—N3—H3B120.0N3—C9—N2117.5 (2)
C2—C3—C4121.6 (3)N3—C9—S123.0 (2)
C2—C3—H3C119.2N2—C9—S119.5 (2)
C4—C3—H3C119.2
C8—N1—N2—C9−173.6 (3)C3—C2—C7—C62.8 (5)
C7—C2—C3—C4−2.1 (5)C1—C2—C7—C6−177.7 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4178.4 (3)C5—C6—C7—C2−0.8 (5)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.7 (5)N2—N1—C8—C5174.4 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C62.8 (5)C4—C5—C8—N15.3 (5)
C3—C4—C5—C8−173.4 (3)C6—C5—C8—N1−170.9 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C7−2.0 (5)N1—N2—C9—N3−8.5 (4)
C8—C5—C6—C7174.2 (3)N1—N2—C9—S170.71 (19)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N3—H3A···N10.862.292.641 (4)105
N2—H2A···Si0.862.543.389 (3)168
N3—H3B···Sii0.862.613.395 (3)153
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N2—H2A⋯Si0.862.543.389 (3)168
N3—H3B⋯Sii0.862.613.395 (3)153
N3—H3A⋯N10.862.292.641 (4)105

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  6 in total

1.  Selective inhibitory activity against MAO and molecular modeling studies of 2-thiazolylhydrazone derivatives.

Authors:  Franco Chimenti; Elias Maccioni; Daniela Secci; Adriana Bolasco; Paola Chimenti; Arianna Granese; Olivia Befani; Paola Turini; Stefano Alcaro; Francesco Ortuso; Maria C Cardia; Simona Distinto
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Synthesis, structural characterization and biological activity of p-fluorobenzaldehyde thiosemicarbazones and of a nickel complex.

Authors:  M B Ferrari; S Capacchi; G Reffo; G Pelosi; P Tarasconi; R Albertini; S Pinelli; P Lunghi
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 4.155

4.  3-Methoxy-benzaldehyde thio-semi-carbazone.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Lin-Ping Wu; Ling-Hua Zhuang; Guo-Wei Wang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-03-28

5.  An investigation of the biological effect of structural modifications of isothiosemicarbazones and their cyclic analogues.

Authors:  E Maccioni; M C Cardia; S Distinto; L Bonsignore; A De Logu
Journal:  Farmaco       Date:  2003-09

6.  The crystal structure of a novel copper(II) complex with asymmetric ligand derived from l-histidine.

Authors:  Patrick Deschamps; Prasad P Kulkarni; Bibudhendra Sarkar
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 5.165

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.