Literature DB >> 21575261

Genetic polymorphisms of DNA double strand break gene Ku70 and gastric cancer in Taiwan.

Mei-Due Yang1, Hwei-Chung Wang, Wen-Shin Chang, Chia-Wen Tsai, Da-Tian Bau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The DNA repair gene Ku70, an important member of non-homologous end-joining repair system, is thought to play an important role in the repairing of DNA double strand breaks. It is known that defects in double strand break repair capacity can lead to irreversible genomic instability. However, the polymorphic variants of Ku70, have never been reported about their association with gastric cancer susceptibility.
METHODS: In this hospital-based case-control study, the associations of Ku70 promoter T-991C (rs5751129), promoter G-57C (rs2267437), promoter A-31G (rs132770), and intron 3 (rs132774) polymorphisms with gastric cancer risk in a Taiwanese population were investigated. In total, 136 patients with gastric cancer and 560 age- and gender-matched healthy controls recruited from the China Medical Hospital in Taiwan were genotyped.
RESULTS: As for Ku70 promoter T-991C, the ORs after adjusted by age and gender of the people carrying TC and CC genotypes were 2.41 (95% CI = 1.53-3.88) and 3.21 (95% CI = 0.96-9.41) respectively, compared to those carrying TT wild-type genotype. The P for trend was significant (P < 0.0001). In the dominant model (TC plus CC versus TT), the association between Ku70 promoter T-991C polymorphism and the risk for gastric cancer was also significant (adjusted OR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.74-3.92). When stratified by age and gender, the association was restricted to those at the age of 55 or elder of age (TC vs TT: adjusted OR = 2.52, 95% CI = 1.37-4.68, P = 0.0139) and male (TC vs TT: adjusted OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.33-4.47, P = 0.0085). As for the other three polymorphisms, there was no difference between both groups in the distributions of their genotype frequencies.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the Ku70 promoter T-991C (rs5751129), but not the Ku70 promoter C-57G (rs2267437), promoter A-31G (rs132770) or intron 3 (rs132774), is associated with gastric cancer susceptibility. This polymorphism may be a novel useful marker for gastric carcinogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21575261      PMCID: PMC3111404          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


Background

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer over the world and affects approximately 900,000 individuals every year [1]. Although the identification of Helicobacter pylori has revolutionized the understanding of its epidemiology and pathogenesis, the initiation etiology and genomic contributing factors of gastric cancer are still largely unknown [2]. Human DNA repair mechanisms protect the genome from various insults caused by endogenous and environmental agents [3], and mutations or defects in the DNA repairing system are thought to be essential for tumorigenesis [4,5]. Therefore, it is logical to suspect that genetic variants of DNA repair genes might contribute to gastric cancer pathogenesis. DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired by the DNA DSB repair system [6,7], which consists of two subpathways, homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) [8]. In humans, NHEJ is the predominant repair system. At present, several proteins involved in the NHEJ pathway have been identified; namely, the ligase IV and its associated protein XRCC4, the three components of the DNA dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) complex, Ku70, Ku80, and the catalytic subunit PKcs [9]. Genetic variation in DNA repair genes has been postulated as an important contributor to the aetiology of gastric cancer [10,11]. However, there is seldom information regarding gastric cancer and DNA repair gene polymorphisms. As for NHEJ, genetic polymorphisms influence DNA repair capacity and confer predisposition to several cancers, including skin [12], breast [13-15], bladder [16,17], and oral cancers [18,19]. In our previous study, we have found that one polymorphism of XRCC4 DSB repair gene is associated with gastric cancer susceptibility in Taiwan [20]. In this study, we assumed that the upstream gene Ku70 in NHEJ, like XRCC4, its polymorphisms may also contribute to gastric carcinogenesis. To test this hypothesis, we determined the genotypic frequency of four polymorphisms of the Ku70 gene at promoter T-991C (rs5751129), promoter G-57C (rs2267437), promoter A-31G (rs132770), and intron 3 (rs132774), using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study carried out to evaluate the contribution of Ku70 polymorphisms in gastric oncology all over the world.

Methods

Study population and sample collection

One hundred and thirty six patients diagnosed with gastric cancer were recruited at the outpatient clinics of general surgery between 2005-2008 at the China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China. The mean age of the gastric cancer patients and the controls were 51.4 (range = 38 to 79, SD = 9.3) and 52.2 (range = 41 to 77, SD = 7.6) years, respectively. All patients voluntarily participated, completed a self-administered questionnaire and provided peripheral blood samples. Five hundred and sixty non-gastric cancer healthy people as controls were selected by matching for age and gender after initial random sampling from the Health Examination Cohort of the hospital. Our study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the China Medical University Hospital and written-informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Genotyping conditions

Genomic DNA was prepared from peripheral blood leucocytes using a QIAamp Blood Mini Kit (Blossom, Taipei, Taiwan). The PCR cycling conditions were: one cycle at 94°C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 30 sec, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Pairs of PCR primer sequences and restriction enzyme for each DNA product are all listed in Table 1. Then, 10 ≥ of product was loaded into a 3% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide for electrophoresis. Ten percent of the samples both in control and patient groups were analyzed of their genotypes by PCR direct sequencing (Genomics BioSci & Tech Co., Taipei) and the consistency is 100%.
Table 1

The primer sequences and restriction fragment length polymorphism conditions for Ku70 gene polymorphisms.

Polymorphism (location)Primers sequences (5' to 3')Restriction enzymeSNP sequenceDNA fragment size (bp)
promoter T-991C(rs5751129)F: AACTCATGGACCCACGGTTGTGAR: CAACTTAAATACAGGAATGTCTTGDpn IITC301200 + 101
promoter G-57C(rs2267437)F: AACTCATGGACCCACGGTTGTGAR: CAACTTAAATACAGGAATGTCTTGHae IICG298195 + 103
promoter A-31G(rs132770)F: TACAGTCCTGACGTAGAAGR: AAGCGACCAACTTGGACAGAMnl IGA226146 + 80
intron 3(rs132774)F: GTATACTTACTGCATTCTGGR: CATAAGTGCTCAGTACCTATMsc IGC160114 + 46

*F and R indicate forward and reverse primers, respectively.

The primer sequences and restriction fragment length polymorphism conditions for Ku70 gene polymorphisms. *F and R indicate forward and reverse primers, respectively.

Statistical analyses

To ensure that the controls used were representative of the general population and to exclude the possibility of genotyping error, the deviation of the genotype frequencies of Ku70 single nucleotide polymorphisms in the control subjects from those expected under the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was assessed using the goodness-of-fit test. Pearson's Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test (when the expected number in any cell was less than five) was used to compare the distribution of the Ku70 genotypes between cases and controls. Cancer risk associated with the genotypes was estimated as odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using unconditional logistic regression. Data was recognized as significant when the statistical P-value was less than 0.05.

Results

There were no significant differences between both groups in their age, sex, and other cancer prevalence. The frequencies of the genotypes of the Ku70 promoter T-991C, promoter C-57G, promoter A-31G, and intron 3 polymorphisms in the gastric cancer and control groups are shown in Table 2. The ORs after adjusted by age and gender of the people carrying TC and CC genotypes were 2.41 (95% CI = 1.53-3.88) and 3.21 (95% CI = 0.96-9.41) respectively, compared to those carrying TT wild-type genotype. The P for trend was significant (P < 0.0001). In the dominant model (TC plus CC versus TT), the association between Ku70 promoter T-991C polymorphism and the risk for gastric cancer was also significant (adjusted OR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.74-3.92). On the contrary, as for the Ku70 promoter C-57G, promoter A-31G, and intron 3 polymorphisms, the distributions of these polymorphisms were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium but there was no difference between gastric cancer and control groups in the distribution in the genotype frequency at these SNP sites (Table 2).
Table 2

The associations between Ku70 polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk

Case (%)Control (%)Adjusted ORa (95% CI)P-value
promoter T-991C (rs5751129)
TT106 (77.9)502 (89.6)1.00 (ref)
TC26 (19.1)52 (9.3)2.41 (1.53-3.88)0.0020
CC4 (3.0)6 (1.1)3.21 (0.96-9.41)0.0837
P for trend2.87 (1.37-5.02)<0.0001
 (TC+CC) vs TT2.48 (1.74-3.92)0.0005
 CC vs (TT+TC)2.67 (0.71-9.69)0.1114
Promoter G-57C (rs2267437)
CC95 (69.9)383 (68.4)1.00 (ref)
CG37 (27.2)167 (29.8)0.91 (0.48-1.38)0.6722
GG4 (2.9)10 (1.8)1.56 (0.55-4.97)0.4954
P for trend0.93 (0.53-3.34)0.6164
 (CG+GG) vs CC0.98 (0.63-1.52)0.8367
 GG vs (CC+CG)1.52 (0.58-5.01)0.4917
promoter A-31G (rs132770)
GG109 (80.1)459 (82.0)1.00 (ref)
GA19 (14.0)73 (13.0)1.16 (0.71-1.93)0.7763
AA8 (5.9)28 (5.0)1.25 (0.51-2.68)0.6642
P for trend1.18 (0.68-2.34)0.9065
 (GA+AA) vs GG1.14 (0.73-1.76)0.6227
 AA vs (GG+GA)1.03 (0.37-3.01)0.6673
intron 3 (rs132774)
GG113 (83.1)459 (82.0)1.00 (ref)
GC23 (16.9)101 (18.0)0.91 (0.60-1.73)0.8040
CC0 (0.0)0 (0.0)

a Adjusted by age and gender; the line with ORs that significantly differ from 1.00 are bolded

The associations between Ku70 polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk a Adjusted by age and gender; the line with ORs that significantly differ from 1.00 are bolded We have further evaluated the genetic association between gastric cancer in different age range and gender by performing the stratification analysis of the Ku70 promoter T-991C genotypes (Table 3). As for those people under the age of 55, the distribution of the Ku70 promoter T-991C genotypes was not significantly different between case and control groups. Interestingly, an increased risk was found in those people at the age of 55 or elder who carried TC genotype, compared with TT genotype (adjusted OR = 2.52, 95% CI = 1.37-4.68, P = 0.0139) (Table 3). When data were stratified by gender, the significantly increased risk was found in those male carrying TC genotype, compared with TT genotype (adjusted OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.33-4.47, P = 0.0085). There was no difference found in female (Table 3).
Table 3

Distribution of Ku70 promoter T-991C genotypes stratified by age and gender in the gastric cancer and control groups

Case (%)Control (%)Adjusted ORa (95% CI)P-value
Age
 < 55
TT52 (80.0)238 (90.8)1.00 (ref)
TC11 (16.9)22 (8.4)2.18 (0.97-4.88)0.0600
CC2 (3.1)2 (0.8)4.31 (0.69-27.33)0.1551
 ≥ 55
TT54 (76.1)264 (88.6)1.00 (ref)
TC15 (21.1)30 (10.1)2.52 (1.37-4.68)0.0139
CC2 (2.8)4 (1.3)2.61 (0.51-11.62)0.2776
Gender
 Male
TT69 (76.7)336 (89.1)1.00 (ref)
TC18 (20.0)36 (9.6)2.58 (1.33-4.47)0.0085
CC3 (3.3)5 (1.3)2.85 (0.71-11.36)0.1477
 Female
TT37 (80.4)166 (90.7)1.00 (ref)
TC8 (17.4)16 (8.7)2.13 (0.79-6.03)0.1019
CC1 (2.2)1 (0.6)4.07 (0.31-69.45)0.3371

a Adjusted by age and gender when appropriate; the line with ORs that significantly differ from 1.00 are bolded

Distribution of Ku70 promoter T-991C genotypes stratified by age and gender in the gastric cancer and control groups a Adjusted by age and gender when appropriate; the line with ORs that significantly differ from 1.00 are bolded

Discussion

The present study is the first one to investigate the role of Ku70 gene polymorphisms, which has never been reported to be associated with gastric cancer risk. Our study revealed that the Ku70 promoter T-991C polymorphism was associated with the susceptibility to gastric cancer, but the C-57G, A-31G or intron 3 polymorphisms were not (Table 2), especially in those at the age of 55 or elder, and in male (Table 3). In 2003, Fu et al have reported that, Ku70 rs2267437 polymorphism (which was called C-61G in their paper) was associated with breast cancer risk [21]. It is reasonable that we did not find a significant association of this SNP with gastric cancer as they did in this SNP with breast cancer in Taiwan population. Instead, we found that the genotype of Ku70 rs2267437 was associated with gastric cacner. Since Ku70 rs2267437 located in the promoter region, its different genotypes may determine the differential expression level of Ku70 protein in the gastric tissue. Thus, the genotypes of Ku70 promoter T-991C (rs5751129) may determine the expression levels of Ku70 in different stages, regulate the DNA repair capacity and overall genome stability, and play a role in gastric carcinogenesis. Supporting the idea above, Hu et al reported that the expression of TERT and Ku70 proteins was significantly up-regulated in both precancerous lesion and gastric cancer tissues and was significantly higher in gastric cancer tissues than that in precancerous lesions [22]. In the future, the correlation between Ku70 rs5751129 genotype and phenotype still needs further investigation. In addition to be associated with oral cancer [18], Ku70 rs5751129 polymorphism was also found to be associated with two-side pterygium pathology, which are caused by an uncontrolled cell proliferation like that of a tumor [23]. We have taken into consideration and tried our best to conquer the limitations of this study. First, for the possibility that some findings of further sub-grouping are attributed to chance because of the limited numbers of patients, we just provided the main finding with these 136 gastric patients and 560 (more than four-fold of the number of the patients) non-cancer controls, which is very convincing and reliable with multiple-checked significances (P < 0.05 both in genotype and allelic frequencies, and those obvious odds ratios and 95% CIs). Second, the false positive findings are statistically explained by hidden population stratification. But in this study, it seems unlikely that population stratification is a major concern, for all the cases and the controls recruited in this study were drawn from the same Taiwanese ethnic group and the Taiwanese population has relatively homogenous genetic background [24]. Therefore, the potential confounding effect of population stratification for genotyping data is not a major concern. Third, the possible selection bias was taken into consideration and reduced to a lowest level by frequency matching on age and gender between the cases and controls. Forth, from another angle, the frequencies of Ku70 polymorphisms variant alleles were similar to those reported in the NCBI website in the Asian population studies, for example C allele frequencies of Ku70 promoter T-991C are 5.7% in our control group and 4.2~8.9% for Asian populations in NCBI, which suggest no selection bias for the subject's enrolments in terms of genotypes. Therefore, the need for the present results of Ku70 promoter T-991C to be verified in further larger gastric patient population is not so urgent. Of course, further studies in larger population and other functional repair assays should be performed in the future for further findings, particularly those among subgroups by clinical and environmental factors, and clarify the mechanisms involved. In this study, the genotype distribution of the C allele at Ku70 promoter T-991C was significantly higher in the gastric cancer group (12.5%) than in the control group (5.7%). It was also found that patients carrying heterozygous TC for Ku70 promoter T-991C had a 2.41-fold higher risk of gastric cancer (Table 2). Combination of heterozygous and homozygous (TC or CC) was almost at the same level (OR = 2.48) for gastric cancer risk (Table 2). All these data suggested that the C allele at Ku70 promoter T-991C was a novel and important biomarker for gastric carcinogenesis, and as long as -991C was detected, the carriers were more susceptible to gastric cancer. As for the Ku70 promoter C-57G, A-31G or intron 3 polymorphisms, our results indicated that their genetic differences were not associated with gastric cancer risk in Taiwanese population (Table 2).

Conclusions

In conclusion, this is the first report to investigate the association between Ku70 gene polymorphisms and gastric cancer. Our findings suggested that Ku70 promoter T-991C, but not Ku70 promoter C-57G, promoter A-31G or intron 3 polymorphisms, was associated with higher susceptibility to gastric cancer. The Ku70 promoter T-991C polymorphism might become a potential biomarker for the gastric oncology prediction and this paper may also provide a valuable insight into the gastric carcinogenesis.

Abbreviations

(DSBs): Double strand breaks; (HR): homologous recombination; (NHEJ): nonhomologous end-joining; (PCR): polymerase chain reaction; (RFLP): restriction fragment length polymorphism; (ORs): odds ratio; (CIs): confidence intervals.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MDY participated in the collection of the samples and clinical data. HCW participated in the literature reviewing. WSC carried out the PCR-RFLP and sequencing genotyping. CWT performed the statistical analysis. DTB designed the study and coordinated the whole team work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/11/174/prepub
  23 in total

Review 1.  Human DNA repair systems: an overview.

Authors:  Z Yu; J Chen; B N Ford; M E Brackley; B W Glickman
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Gene-environment interaction involved in oral carcinogenesis: molecular epidemiological study for metabolic and DNA repair gene polymorphisms.

Authors:  Tomotaka Sugimura; Hiroshi Kumimoto; Iwai Tohnai; Takafumi Fukui; Keitaro Matsuo; Shinichi Tsurusako; Kenji Mitsudo; Minoru Ueda; Kazuo Tajima; Kanji Ishizaki
Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.253

3.  Oral cancer and genetic polymorphism of DNA double strand break gene Ku70 in Taiwan.

Authors:  Da-Tian Bau; Hsien-Chang Tseng; Chung-Hsing Wang; Chang-Fang Chiu; Chun-Hung Hua; Cheng-Nan Wu; Shiu-Yun Liang; Cheng-Li Wang; Chia-Wen Tsai; Ming-Hsui Tsai
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 5.337

4.  Pterygium and genetic polymorphism of DNA double strand break repair gene Ku70.

Authors:  Yi-Yu Tsai; Da-Tian Bau; Chun-Chi Chiang; Ya-Wen Cheng; Sung-Huei Tseng; Fuu-Jen Tsai
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.367

5.  A novel single nucleotide polymorphism in XRCC4 gene is associated with gastric cancer susceptibility in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chang-Fang Chiu; Chung-Hsing Wang; Cheng-Li Wang; Cheng-Chieh Lin; Nan-Yung Hsu; Jing-Ru Weng; Da-Tian Bau
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  A new single nucleotide polymorphism in XRCC4 gene is associated with breast cancer susceptibility in Taiwanese patients.

Authors:  Chang-Fang Chiu; Hwei-Chung Wang; Chung-Hsing Wang; Cheng-Li Wang; Cheng-Chieh Lin; Chen-Yang Shen; Su-Yin Chiang; Da-Tian Bau
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  Significant association of an XRCC4 single nucleotide polymorphism with bladder cancer susceptibility in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chao-Hsiang Chang; Chia-Lin Chang; Chia-Wen Tsai; Hsi-Chin Wu; Chang-Fang Chiu; Rou-Fen Wang; Chiu-Shong Liu; Cheng-Chieh Lin; Da-Tian Bau
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.480

8.  DNA double-strand break repair capacity and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Da-Tian Bau; Yi-Chien Mau; Shian-Ling Ding; Pei-Ei Wu; Chen-Yang Shen
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  A novel single nucleotide polymorphism in XRCC4 gene is associated with oral cancer susceptibility in Taiwanese patients.

Authors:  Chang-Fang Chiu; Ming-Hsui Tsai; Hsien-Chang Tseng; Cheng-Li Wang; Chung-Hsing Wang; Cheng-Nan Wu; Cheng-Chieh Lin; Da-Tian Bau
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.337

10.  XPA, haplotypes, and risk of basal and squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Katie L Miller; Margaret R Karagas; Peter Kraft; David J Hunter; Paul J Catalano; Steven H Byler; Heather H Nelson
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 4.944

View more
  10 in total

1.  Contribution of matrix metalloproteinases-1 genotypes to gastric cancer susceptibility in Taiwan.

Authors:  Mei-Due Yang; Kuo-Cheng Lin; Meng-Chun Lu; Long-Bin Jeng; Chieh-Lun Hsiao; Te-Cheng Yueh; Chun-Kai Fu; Hsin-Ting Li; Shiou-Ting Yen; Chia-Wen Lin; Cin-Wun Wu; Su-Yi Pang; Da-Tian Bau; Fuu-Jen Tsai
Journal:  Biomedicine (Taipei)       Date:  2017-06-14

2.  Association between polymorphisms at promoters of XRCC5 and XRCC6 genes and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Mehrdad Rajaei; Iraj Saadat; Shahpour Omidvari; Mostafa Saadat
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Quantitative assessment of the association between XRCC6 C1310G polymorphism and cancer risk.

Authors:  Hong Jiang; Yun Lin; Chang-qing Yang; Qi Li; Jinhong Luo; Ying Zhou; Junli Xue; Wei Wei; Yong Gao
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-12-28

Review 4.  Association between the XRCC6 Promoter rs2267437 polymorphism and cancer risk: evidence based on the current literature.

Authors:  Haitao Xu; Peng Zou; Pin Chen; Lin Zhao; Peng Zhao; Ailin Lu
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2013-06-08

5.  Role of polymorphic XRCC6 (Ku70)/XRCC7 (DNA-PKcs) genes towards susceptibility and prognosis of lung cancer patients undergoing platinum based doublet chemotherapy.

Authors:  Amrita Singh; Navneet Singh; Digambar Behera; Siddharth Sharma
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 6.  Association between the XRCC6 polymorphisms and cancer risks: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Jia; Juan Ren; Dongmei Yan; Long Xiao; Ruifen Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  The current progress and future prospects of personalized radiogenomic cancer study.

Authors:  Juhn-Cherng Liu; Wu-Chung Shen; Tzu-Ching Shih; Chia-Wen Tsai; Wen-Shin Chang; Der-Yang Cho; Chang-Hai Tsai; Da-Tian Bau
Journal:  Biomedicine (Taipei)       Date:  2015-02-02

Review 8.  The Role of the Core Non-Homologous End Joining Factors in Carcinogenesis and Cancer.

Authors:  Brock J Sishc; Anthony J Davis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Genetic Variation in the 3'-Untranslated Region of NBN Gene Is Associated with Gastric Cancer Risk in a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Ping Sun; Jiangbo Du; Xun Zhu; Chuanli Ren; Lan Xie; Ningbin Dai; Yayun Gu; Caiwang Yan; Juncheng Dai; Hongxia Ma; Yue Jiang; Jiaping Chen; Zhibin Hu; Hongbing Shen; Haorong Wu; Guangfu Jin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Telomere-regulating genes and the telomere interactome in familial cancers.

Authors:  Carla Daniela Robles-Espinoza; Martin del Castillo Velasco-Herrera; Nicholas K Hayward; David J Adams
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.852

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.