Literature DB >> 23745766

Association between the XRCC6 Promoter rs2267437 polymorphism and cancer risk: evidence based on the current literature.

Haitao Xu1, Peng Zou, Pin Chen, Lin Zhao, Peng Zhao, Ailin Lu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that the DNA repair gene XRCC6 (Ku70) may be critically involved in the aetiology of the human carcinogenesis. Many studies have investigated the association between the rs2267437 polymorphism and cancer susceptibility. However, the results of these studies have been controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to quantitatively summarize the evidence for a relationship between the rs2267437 polymorphism and cancer risk.
METHODS: Electronic databases, including PUBMED and EMBASE, were searched for publications that met the inclusion criteria. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the strength of the association between the XRCC6 promoter rs2267437 polymorphism and cancer risk in a fixed-effects model (the Mantel-Haenszel method) or a random-effects model (the DerSimonian and Laird method), as appropriate.
RESULTS: A total of 13 case-control studies, involving 3675 cases and 4247 controls, investigating the XRCC6 rs2267437 polymorphism and cancer susceptibility were identified for the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed that there is a significant relationship between the XRCC6 rs2267437 polymorphism and cancer susceptibility (GG vs. CC: OR=1.28, 95% CI=1.03-1.60). Subgroup analyses based on the cancer type, ethnicity, and source of the controls were also performed, and these results indicated that the XRCC6 promoter rs2267437 polymorphism was associated with cancer risk in breast cancer studies (GG vs. CC: OR=1.79, 95% CI=1.25-2.56; GG vs. CG+CC: OR=1.40, 95% CI=1.01-1.95), in Asian populations (GG vs. CC: OR=1.33, 95% CI=1.01-1.74) and in population-based studies (GG vs. CC: OR=1.57, 95% CI=1.12-2.22; CG vs. CC: OR=1.35, 95% CI=1.11-1.64; GG+CG vs. CC: OR=1.37, 95% CI=1.14-1.65).
CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that the XRCC6 rs2267437 polymorphism may affect breast cancer susceptibility and increase the risk of cancer in Asian populations and in the general population. It is critical that further large-scale and well-designed studies be conducted to confirm the association between the rs2267437 genotype and cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23745766      PMCID: PMC3732414          DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2013.0083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers        ISSN: 1945-0257


  36 in total

Review 1.  DNA double strand break repair and chromosomal translocation: lessons from animal models.

Authors:  D O Ferguson; F W Alt
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-09-10       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Unrepaired DNA breaks in p53-deficient cells lead to oncogenic gene amplification subsequent to translocations.

Authors:  Chengming Zhu; Kevin D Mills; David O Ferguson; Charles Lee; John Manis; James Fleming; Yijie Gao; Cynthia C Morton; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection.

Authors:  K K Khanna; S P Jackson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  DNA-PKcs is critical for telomere capping.

Authors:  D Gilley; H Tanaka; M P Hande; A Kurimasa; G C Li; M Oshimura; D J Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Sp/Krüppel-like transcription factors are essential for the expression of mitochondrial glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase promoter B.

Authors:  Noaman M Hasan; Michael J MacDonald
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  Increased ionizing radiation sensitivity and genomic instability in the absence of histone H2AX.

Authors:  Craig H Bassing; Katrin F Chua; JoAnn Sekiguchi; Heikyung Suh; Scott R Whitlow; James C Fleming; Brianna C Monroe; David N Ciccone; Catherine Yan; Katerina Vlasakova; David M Livingston; David O Ferguson; Ralph Scully; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The absence of the dna-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit in mice results in anaphase bridges and in increased telomeric fusions with normal telomere length and G-strand overhang.

Authors:  F A Goytisolo; E Samper; S Edmonson; G E Taccioli; M A Blasco
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  DNA repair protein Ku80 suppresses chromosomal aberrations and malignant transformation.

Authors:  M J Difilippantonio; J Zhu; H T Chen; E Meffre; M C Nussenzweig; E E Max; T Ried; A Nussenzweig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-30       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Esophageal cancer risk is associated with polymorphisms of DNA repair genes MSH2 and WRN in Chinese population.

Authors:  Ting Li; Qifeng Suo; Dan He; Wenting Du; Mingming Yang; Xuejiao Fan; Ji Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 15.609

View more
  3 in total

1.  Association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair genes and prostate cancer aggressiveness in the Spanish population.

Authors:  L A Henríquez-Hernández; A Valenciano; P Foro-Arnalot; M J Álvarez-Cubero; J M Cozar; J F Suárez-Novo; M Castells-Esteve; P Fernández-Gonzalo; B De-Paula-Carranza; M Ferrer; F Guedea; G Sancho-Pardo; J Craven-Bartle; M J Ortiz-Gordillo; P Cabrera-Roldán; J I Rodríguez-Melcón; E Herrera-Ramos; C Rodríguez-Gallego; P C Lara
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 2.  Association between the XRCC6 polymorphisms and cancer risks: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Jia; Juan Ren; Dongmei Yan; Long Xiao; Ruifen Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 3.  The Role of the Core Non-Homologous End Joining Factors in Carcinogenesis and Cancer.

Authors:  Brock J Sishc; Anthony J Davis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.