Literature DB >> 21574741

Psychophysics of the McGurk and other audiovisual speech integration effects.

Jintao Jiang1, Lynne E Bernstein.   

Abstract

When the auditory and visual components of spoken audiovisual nonsense syllables are mismatched, perceivers produce four different types of perceptual responses, auditory correct, visual correct, fusion (the so-called McGurk effect), and combination (i.e., two consonants are reported). Here, quantitative measures were developed to account for the distribution of the four types of perceptual responses to 384 different stimuli from four talkers. The measures included mutual information, correlations, and acoustic measures, all representing audiovisual stimulus relationships. In Experiment 1, open-set perceptual responses were obtained for acoustic /bɑ/ or /lɑ/ dubbed to video /bɑ, dɑ, gɑ, vɑ, zɑ, lɑ, wɑ, ðɑ/. The talker, the video syllable, and the acoustic syllable significantly influenced the type of response. In Experiment 2, the best predictors of response category proportions were a subset of the physical stimulus measures, with the variance accounted for in the perceptual response category proportions between 17% and 52%. That audiovisual stimulus relationships can account for perceptual response distributions supports the possibility that internal representations are based on modality-specific stimulus relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21574741      PMCID: PMC3149717          DOI: 10.1037/a0023100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  43 in total

1.  Perceptual fusion and stimulus coincidence in the cross-modal integration of speech.

Authors:  Lee M Miller; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Hearing lips and seeing voices: how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Jeremy I Skipper; Virginie van Wassenhove; Howard C Nusbaum; Steven L Small
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  The processing of audio-visual speech: empirical and neural bases.

Authors:  Ruth Campbell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  An event-related fMRI investigation of voice-onset time discrimination.

Authors:  Emmette R Hutchison; Sheila E Blumstein; Emily B Myers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Intermodal timing relations and audio-visual speech recognition by normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  M McGrath; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Hemispheric lateralization of voice onset time (VOT) comparison between depth and scalp EEG recordings.

Authors:  Agnés Trébuchon-Da Fonseca; Kimberly Giraud; Jean-Michel Badier; Patrick Chauvel; Catherine Liégeois-Chauvel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The natural statistics of audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Chandramouli Chandrasekaran; Andrea Trubanova; Sébastien Stillittano; Alice Caplier; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  MEG correlates of categorical perception of a voice onset time continuum in humans.

Authors:  P G Simos; R L Diehl; J I Breier; M R Molis; G Zouridakis; A C Papanicolaou
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1998-10

9.  Similarity structure in visual speech perception and optical phonetic signals.

Authors:  Jintao Jiang; Edward T Auer; Abeer Alwan; Patricia A Keating; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-10

10.  Facial identity and facial speech processing: familiar faces and voices in the McGurk effect.

Authors:  S Walker; V Bruce; C O'Malley
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-11
View more
  27 in total

1.  A visual or tactile signal makes auditory speech detection more efficient by reducing uncertainty.

Authors:  Bosco S Tjan; Ewen Chao; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Similar frequency of the McGurk effect in large samples of native Mandarin Chinese and American English speakers.

Authors:  John F Magnotti; Debshila Basu Mallick; Guo Feng; Bin Zhou; Wen Zhou; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Rethinking the McGurk effect as a perceptual illusion.

Authors:  Laura M Getz; Joseph C Toscano
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Audiovisual integration as conflict resolution: The conflict of the McGurk illusion.

Authors:  Luis Morís Fernández; Emiliano Macaluso; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Spatial Frequency Requirements and Gaze Strategy in Visual-Only and Audiovisual Speech Perception.

Authors:  Amanda H Wilson; Agnès Alsius; Martin Paré; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  McGurk stimuli for the investigation of multisensory integration in cochlear implant users: The Oldenburg Audio Visual Speech Stimuli (OLAVS).

Authors:  Maren Stropahl; Sebastian Schellhardt; Stefan Debener
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

7.  Response Errors in Females' and Males' Sentence Lipreading Necessitate Structurally Different Models for Predicting Lipreading Accuracy.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Lang Learn       Date:  2018-02-26

8.  Neural networks supporting audiovisual integration for speech: A large-scale lesion study.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; Corianne Rogalsky; William Matchin; Alexandra Basilakos; Julia Cai; Sara Pillay; Michelle Ferrill; Soren Mickelsen; Steven W Anderson; Tracy Love; Jeffrey Binder; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Variability and stability in the McGurk effect: contributions of participants, stimuli, time, and response type.

Authors:  Debshila Basu Mallick; John F Magnotti; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

10.  The noisy encoding of disparity model of the McGurk effect.

Authors:  John F Magnotti; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.