Literature DB >> 18038946

Similarity structure in visual speech perception and optical phonetic signals.

Jintao Jiang1, Edward T Auer, Abeer Alwan, Patricia A Keating, Lynne E Bernstein.   

Abstract

A complete understanding of visual phonetic perception (lipreading) requires linking perceptual effects to physical stimulus properties. However, the talking face is a highly complex stimulus, affording innumerable possible physical measurements. In the search for isomorphism between stimulus properties and phoneticeffects, second-order isomorphism was examined between theperceptual similarities of video-recorded perceptually identified speech syllables and the physical similarities among the stimuli. Four talkers produced the stimulus syllables comprising 23 initial consonants followed by one of three vowels. Six normal-hearing participants identified the syllables in a visual-only condition. Perceptual stimulus dissimilarity was quantified using the Euclidean distances between stimuli in perceptual spaces obtained via multidimensional scaling. Physical stimulus dissimilarity was quantified using face points recorded in three dimensions by an optical motion capture system. The variance accounted for in the relationship between the perceptual and the physical dissimilarities was evaluated using both the raw dissimilarities and the weighted dissimilarities. With weighting and the full set of 3-D optical data, the variance accounted for ranged between 46% and 66% across talkers and between 49% and 64% across vowels. The robust second-order relationship between the sparse 3-D point representation of visible speech and the perceptual effects suggests that the 3-D point representation is a viable basis for controlled studies of first-order relationships between visual phonetic perception and physical stimulus attributes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18038946     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  10 in total

1.  Quantified acoustic-optical speech signal incongruity identifies cortical sites of audiovisual speech processing.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jintao Jiang
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Psychophysics of the McGurk and other audiovisual speech integration effects.

Authors:  Jintao Jiang; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Visual phonetic processing localized using speech and nonspeech face gestures in video and point-light displays.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Jintao Jiang; Dimitrios Pantazis; Zhong-Lin Lu; Anand Joshi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Timing in audiovisual speech perception: A mini review and new psychophysical data.

Authors:  Jonathan H Venezia; Steven M Thurman; William Matchin; Sahara E George; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Cued Speech Transliteration: Effects of Accuracy and Lag Time on Message Intelligibility.

Authors:  Jean C Krause; Katherine A Lopez
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2017-10-01

6.  The visual mismatch negativity elicited with visual speech stimuli.

Authors:  Benjamin T Files; Edward T Auer; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Neural pathways for visual speech perception.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Einat Liebenthal
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Lip-reading aids word recognition most in moderate noise: a Bayesian explanation using high-dimensional feature space.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Xiang Zhou; Lars A Ross; John J Foxe; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Auditory Perceptual Learning for Speech Perception Can be Enhanced by Audiovisual Training.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Edward T Auer; Silvio P Eberhardt; Jintao Jiang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Visual speech discrimination and identification of natural and synthetic consonant stimuli.

Authors:  Benjamin T Files; Bosco S Tjan; Jintao Jiang; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.