| Literature DB >> 21572715 |
Fawwaz Al-Joudi1, Anuar Bin Ali, Majdan Bin Ramli, Suhair Ahmed, Mohd Ismail.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Red blood cell (RBC) alloantibodies may be formed following exposure to RBC antigens. In most cases, the alloimmunization develops during pregnancy or from previous blood transfusions. The RBC antigens and their alloantibodies vary among different human populations and ethnic groups, and they do have a clinical significance for their adverse immunological reactions. AIMS: This study aimed at studying the prevalence of RBC alloantibodies at the Blood Transfusion Unit of Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II in Kota Bharu, Malaysia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed utilizing data obtained in the years 2007 and 2008. Data of antibody screening tests from 5719 patients were examined. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The overall prevalence of alloimmunization was 65 (1.13%). The majority of these had a single alloantibody (76.9%), whereas the remaining 23.1% had multiple antibodies. The anti-E antibody comprised the most common alloantibody (24.6%) followed by the anti-Lewis (a) antibodies (18.5%) and the anti-M antibody (13.8%). There were more female recipients than males.Entities:
Keywords: RBC antigens; alloantibodies; blood transfusion
Year: 2011 PMID: 21572715 PMCID: PMC3082716 DOI: 10.4103/0973-6247.75997
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Transfus Sci ISSN: 0973-6247
Descriptive analysis of study patients
| Ethnicity | Gender | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | ||
| Malay | 3896 | 1613 | 5509 (96.3) |
| Chinese | 88 | 64 | 152 (2.65) |
| Siamese | 40 | 12 | 52 (0.91) |
| Indian | 2 | 1 | 3 (0.05) |
| Orang Asli | 3 | 0 | 3 (0.05) |
| Total | 4029 (70.4) | 1690 | 5719 |
Figures in parentheses are in percentage
Figure 1Histogram showing the age distribution of the study patients
Figure 2A bar chart showing the sample distribution according to their medical histories
The prevalence of alloantibodies and autoantibodies among the study patients
| Variable | Prevalence | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alloantibody | 65 | 1.13 | 0.8–1.4 |
| Autoantibody | 32 | 0.56 | 0.36–0.5 |
The distribution of blood groups among the study patients
| Type of blood group | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|
| O, Rh positive | 17 (26.2) |
| A, Rh positive | 23 (35.4) |
| B, Rh positive | 21 (32.3) |
| AB, Rh positive | 3 (4.6) |
| O, Rh negative | 1(1.5) |
The distribution of RBC alloantibodies based on number of alloantibodies in each study subject (n = 65)
| Variable | |
|---|---|
| Single | 50 (76.9) |
| Multiple | 15 (23.1) |
The distribution of RBC alloantibody types detected
| Variable | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Anti-c | 2 | 3.1 |
| Anti-D | 1 | 1.5 |
| Anti-E | 16 | 24.6 |
| Anti-E + Anti-Jka | 1 | 1.5 |
| Anti-E + Anti-K + Auto-IgG | 7 | 10.8 |
| Anti-Jkb | 2 | 3.1 |
| Anti-Lewis (a) | 12 | 18.5 |
| Anti-Lewis (a + b) | 7 | 10.8 |
| Anti-Lewis (b) | 7 | 13.8 |
| Anti-M | 9 | 10.8 |
| Anti-E + Auto IgG | 1 | 1.5 |
| Total | 65 | 100.0 |
The factors associated with the development of RBC alloantibody (n = 400)
| Variable | n | Wald | Odds | 95% OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| statistics | ratio | (CI) | |||
| (df) | (OR) | ||||
| Female (reference) | 52 | 29.92(1) | <0.001 | 0.08 | 0.04–0.20 |
| Male | 348 | ||||
| No (reference) | 325 | 5.52 (1) | 0.019 | 2.35 | 1.15–4.78 |
| Yes | 75 | ||||
| Other than A | 364 | 34.99 (1) | <0.001 | 12.21 | 5.33–27.97 |
| positive | 36 | ||||
| A+ ve |
Fitness of the model was tested by Hosmer and Lemeshow, P > 0.05.
The association between frequency of alloantibody formation and gender
| Gender | % of alloantibody n (%) | Chi square | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | value, χ2 | ||
| Male | 43 (0.8%) | 1647 (28.8%) | 42.13 | <0.001 |
| Female | 22 (0.4%) | 4007 (70.1%) | ||
The association of alloantibody with ethnicity
| Ethnicity | % of alloantibody | Chi square | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | value, χ2 | ||
| Malay | 57 (1.0%) | 5452 (95.3%) | 13.86 | <0.001 |
| Non-Malay | 8 (0.1%) | 202(3.5%) | ||