Literature DB >> 21569623

The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States.

Dorian J Garrick1.   

Abstract

Artificial selection has proven to be effective at altering the performance of animal production systems. Nevertheless, selection based on assessment of the genetic superiority of candidates is suboptimal as a result of errors in the prediction of genetic merit. Conventional breeding programs may extend phenotypic measurements on selection candidates to include correlated indicator traits, or delay selection decisions well beyond puberty so that phenotypic performance can be observed on progeny or other relatives. Extending the generation interval to increase the accuracy of selection reduces annual rates of gain compared to accurate selection and use of parents of the next generation at the immediate time they reach breeding age. Genomic prediction aims at reducing prediction errors at breeding age by exploiting information on the transmission of chromosome fragments from parents to selection candidates, in conjunction with knowledge on the value of every chromosome fragment. For genomic prediction to influence beef cattle breeding programs and the rate or cost of genetic gains, training analyses must be undertaken, and genomic prediction tools made available for breeders and other industry stakeholders. This paper reviews the nature or kind of studies currently underway, the scope or extent of some of those studies, and comments on the likely predictive value of genomic information for beef cattle improvement.
© 2011 Garrick; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21569623      PMCID: PMC3107171          DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Sel Evol        ISSN: 0999-193X            Impact factor:   4.297


  32 in total

1.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection.

Authors:  A Nejati-Javaremi; C Smith; J P Gibson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Commercial application of marker- and gene-assisted selection in livestock: strategies and lessons.

Authors:  J C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Accuracy of marker-assisted selection with single markers and marker haplotypes in cattle.

Authors:  B J Hayes; A J Chamberlain; H McPartlan; I Macleod; L Sethuraman; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Genomic selection: marker assisted selection on a genome wide scale.

Authors:  Theo Meuwissen
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Derivation, calculation, and use of national animal model information.

Authors:  P M VanRaden; G R Wiggans
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Power of daughter and granddaughter designs for determining linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci in dairy cattle.

Authors:  J I Weller; Y Kashi; M Soller
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production in dairy cattle by exploiting progeny testing.

Authors:  M Georges; D Nielsen; M Mackinnon; A Mishra; R Okimoto; A T Pasquino; L S Sargeant; A Sorensen; M R Steele; X Zhao
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Breeding value prediction for production traits in layer chickens using pedigree or genomic relationships in a reduced animal model.

Authors:  Anna Wolc; Chris Stricker; Jesus Arango; Petek Settar; Janet E Fulton; Neil P O'Sullivan; Rudolf Preisinger; David Habier; Rohan Fernando; Dorian J Garrick; Susan J Lamont; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Beatriz Villanueva; John A Woolliams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  29 in total

1.  Genome-wide association and genotype by environment interactions for growth traits in U.S. Red Angus cattle.

Authors:  Johanna L Smith; Miranda L Wilson; Sara M Nilson; Troy N Rowan; Robert D Schnabel; Jared E Decker; Christopher M Seabury
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.547

2.  Efficient weighting methods for genomic best linear-unbiased prediction (BLUP) adapted to the genetic architectures of quantitative traits.

Authors:  Duanyang Ren; Lixia An; Baojun Li; Liying Qiao; Wenzhong Liu
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 3.  Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding.

Authors:  Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Accuracies of genomic breeding values in American Angus beef cattle using K-means clustering for cross-validation.

Authors:  Mahdi Saatchi; Mathew C McClure; Stephanie D McKay; Megan M Rolf; JaeWoo Kim; Jared E Decker; Tasia M Taxis; Richard H Chapple; Holly R Ramey; Sally L Northcutt; Stewart Bauck; Brent Woodward; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Robert D Schnabel; Dorian J Garrick; Jeremy F Taylor
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Non-additive genetic variation in growth, carcass and fertility traits of beef cattle.

Authors:  Sunduimijid Bolormaa; Jennie E Pryce; Yuandan Zhang; Antonio Reverter; William Barendse; Ben J Hayes; Michael E Goddard
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Multiple Linkage Disequilibrium Mapping Methods to Validate Additive Quantitative Trait Loci in Korean Native Cattle (Hanwoo).

Authors:  Yi Li; Jong-Joo Kim
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.509

7.  Detection of QTL for Carcass Quality on Chromosome 6 by Exploiting Linkage and Linkage Disequilibrium in Hanwoo.

Authors:  J-H Lee; Y Li; J-J Kim
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  The effect of genomic information on optimal contribution selection in livestock breeding programs.

Authors:  Samuel A Clark; Brian P Kinghorn; John M Hickey; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Genome-wide association study for backfat thickness in Canchim beef cattle using Random Forest approach.

Authors:  Fabiana Barichello Mokry; Roberto Hiroshi Higa; Maurício de Alvarenga Mudadu; Andressa Oliveira de Lima; Sarah Laguna Conceição Meirelles; Marcos Vinicius Gualberto Barbosa da Silva; Fernando Flores Cardoso; Maurício Morgado de Oliveira; Ismael Urbinati; Simone Cristina Méo Niciura; Rymer Ramiz Tullio; Maurício Mello de Alencar; Luciana Correia de Almeida Regitano
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Accuracy of direct genomic breeding values for nationally evaluated traits in US Limousin and Simmental beef cattle.

Authors:  Mahdi Saatchi; Robert D Schnabel; Megan M Rolf; Jeremy F Taylor; Dorian J Garrick
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.