Literature DB >> 21562726

Prognostic value of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance and dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with low-risk chest pain.

Gregory Hartlage1, Matthew Janik, Athanasios Anadiotis, Emir Veledar, John Oshinski, Dimitrios Kremastinos, Arthur Stillman, Stamatios Lerakis.   

Abstract

Excluding obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) as the etiology of acute chest pain in patients without diagnostic electrocardiographic changes or elevated serum cardiac biomarkers is challenging. Stress testing is a valuable risk-stratifying technique reserved for the subset of these patients with low-risk chest pain who have an intermediate clinical probability of obstructive CAD. Given the risks of radiation inherent to nuclear and computed tomography imaging, both adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (AS-CMR) imaging and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) are attractive alternative stress modalities. An essential characteristic of stress modalities is their negative prognostic value; as one must exclude clinically-relevant CAD such that patients can be discharged safely. Therefore, the aim of this study was to validate a favorable negative prognostic value for both AS-CMR and DSE in patients presenting with low-risk acute chest pain. This retrospective study included 255 patients with low-risk acute chest pain and no prior history of CAD presenting to the emergency department at our institution, with 89 patients evaluated by AS-CMR and 166 by DSE. Median follow-up was 292 days, and consisted of medical record review. The primary end-point was the composite of cardiac death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, obstructive CAD on invasive coronary angiography (ICA) or recurrent chest pain requiring hospital admission. Test characteristics such as sensitivity and specificity could not be evaluated as patients were not routinely evaluated with ICA. All patients completed the stress protocol without adverse events during testing. 82/89 patients (92.1%) and 164/166 patients (98.8%) had negative AS-CMR and DSE studies, respectively. Both AS-CMR and DSE had excellent negative prognostic values for the primary endpoint, 100 and 99%, respectively. Both AS-CMR and DSE are effective stress modalities for excluding clinically significant coronary artery disease in patients presenting acute low-risk chest pain. Patients without findings to suggest ischemia have an excellent intermediate-term prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21562726     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9885-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  32 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of left main and triple vessel coronary artery disease: a comparative meta-analysis.

Authors:  N Mahajan; L Polavaram; H Vankayala; B Ference; Y Wang; J Ager; J Kovach; L Afonso
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging.

Authors:  Igor Klem; John F Heitner; Dipan J Shah; Michael H Sketch; Victor Behar; Jonathan Weinsaft; Peter Cawley; Michele Parker; Michael Elliott; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Harvey D White
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography during pharmacological stress for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Sahar S Abdelmoneim; Abhijeet Dhoble; Mathieu Bernier; Patricia J Erwin; Grigorios Korosoglou; Roxy Senior; Stuart Moir; Ingrid Kowatsch; Shu Xian-Hong; Takashi Muro; Dana Dawson; Rolf Vogel; Kevin Wei; Colin P West; Victor M Montori; Patricia A Pellikka; Samir S Abdel-Kader; Sharon L Mulvagh
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-06-23

5.  Prognostic value of predischarge dobutamine stress echocardiography in chest pain patients with a negative cardiac troponin T.

Authors:  Radha Bholasingh; Jan Hein Cornel; Otto Kamp; Jan P van Straalen; Gerard T Sanders; Jan G P Tijssen; Victor A W M Umans; Cees A Visser; Robbert J de Winter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary.

Authors:  Stephen R Pitts; Richard W Niska; Jianmin Xu; Catharine W Burt
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2008-08-06

7.  A rapid diagnostic and treatment center for patients with chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  W B Gibler; J P Runyon; R C Levy; M R Sayre; R Kacich; C R Hattemer; C Hamilton; J W Gerlach; R A Walsh
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 8.  Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Michèle Hamon; Georges Fau; Guillaume Née; Javed Ehtisham; Rémy Morello; Martial Hamon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Jersey Chen; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Andrew J Einstein; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Prognostic value of normal adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Guenter Pilz; Andrea Jeske; Markus Klos; Eman Ali; Berthold Hoefling; Roland Scheck; Peter Bernhardt
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Advances in stress cardiac MRI and computed tomography.

Authors:  Yasmin S Hamirani; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2013-09

Review 2.  Noninvasive cardiac imaging in suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; S Richard Underwood; Roxy Senior; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Comparison of treadmill exercise stress cardiac MRI to stress echocardiography in healthy volunteers for adequacy of left ventricular endocardial wall visualization: A pilot study.

Authors:  Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan; Jennifer A Dickerson; Debbie Scandling; Vijay Balasubramanian; Michael L Pennell; Alice Hinton; Subha V Raman; Orlando P Simonetti
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Cardiovascular imaging 2012 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Diagnosis and management of ischemic cardiomyopathy: Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christina Doesch; Theano Papavassiliu
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-26

6.  Prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Lipinski; Courtney M McVey; Jeffrey S Berger; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Design and rationale of the MR-INFORM study: stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to guide the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Shazia T Hussain; Matthias Paul; Sven Plein; Gerry P McCann; Ajay M Shah; Michael S Marber; Amedeo Chiribiri; Geraint Morton; Simon Redwood; Philip MacCarthy; Andreas Schuster; Masaki Ishida; Mark A Westwood; Divaka Perera; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance in the evaluation of patients presenting with suspected or confirmed acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Loren P Budge; Michael Salerno
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 1.866

9.  Coronary calcification compromises myocardial perfusion irrespective of luminal stenosis.

Authors:  Michael Y Henein; Tarek Bengrid; Rachel Nicoll; Ying Zhao; Bengt Johansson; Axel Schmermund
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2016-12-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.