Literature DB >> 18471450

Prognostic value of normal adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Guenter Pilz1, Andrea Jeske, Markus Klos, Eman Ali, Berthold Hoefling, Roland Scheck, Peter Bernhardt.   

Abstract

We investigated the prognostic value of normal adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Prospectively enrolled in the study were 218 patients with suspected CAD, no stress hypoperfusion, and no delayed enhancement in CMR, and consecutively deferred coronary angiography. The primary end point was a 12-month rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularization, hospitalization due to cardiovascular event). CMR indication was symptomatic angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society II in 42% and III in 7%) or evaluation of myocardial ischemia in patients with arrhythmia, syncope, and/or equivocal stress tests and cardiovascular risk factors (51%). As the main result, the 12-month MACE rate was 2/218 (1 stent implantation, 1 bypass surgery) and CMR negative predictive value 99.1%. There was no cardiac death or myocardial infarction. In conclusion, normal adenosine stress CMR predicts a very low MACE rate and an excellent 1-year prognosis in patients with suspected CAD. Our results provide clinical reassurance that patients at risk for CAD-associated MACE were not missed by CMR. Hence, CMR may serve as a reliable noninvasive gatekeeper to reduce the number of redundant coronary angiographies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18471450     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  27 in total

1.  Towards a noninvasive anatomical and functional diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J G J Groothuis; A M Beek; M R Meijerink; S L Brinckman; M B M Hofman; A C van Rossum
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 2.  Non-invasive imaging in coronary artery disease including anatomical and functional evaluation of ischaemia and viability assessment.

Authors:  M Pakkal; V Raj; G P McCann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Stress myocardial perfusion imaging by CMR provides strong prognostic value to cardiac events regardless of patient's sex.

Authors:  Otavio R Coelho-Filho; Luciana F Seabra; François-Pierre Mongeon; Shuaib M Abdullah; Sanjeev A Francis; Ron Blankstein; Marcelo F Di Carli; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-08

4.  Pharmacological stress: a useful exercise?

Authors:  E E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Assessment of myocardial ischemia with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Bobak Heydari; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 6.  New noninvasive imaging technologies in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Juan Gaztanaga; Mario J Garcia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of stress myocardial perfusion MRI and SPECT in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kunihiro Iwata; Katsuhiko Ogasawara
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-07-18

8.  Prognostic value of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance and dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with low-risk chest pain.

Authors:  Gregory Hartlage; Matthew Janik; Athanasios Anadiotis; Emir Veledar; John Oshinski; Dimitrios Kremastinos; Arthur Stillman; Stamatios Lerakis
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Michèle Hamon; Georges Fau; Guillaume Née; Javed Ehtisham; Rémy Morello; Martial Hamon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Prognostic value of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with low-risk chest pain.

Authors:  Stamatios Lerakis; Dalton S McLean; Athanasios V Anadiotis; Matthew Janik; John N Oshinski; Nikolaos Alexopoulos; Elisa Zaragoza-Macias; Emir Veledar; Arthur E Stillman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.