Comparison of treadmill exercise stress cardiac MRI to stress echocardiography in healthy volunteers for adequacy of left ventricular endocardial wall visualization: A pilot study.

PURPOSE: To compare exercise stress cardiac magnetic resonance (cardiac MR) to echocardiography in healthy volunteers with respect to adequacy of endocardial visualization and confidence of stress study interpretation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight healthy volunteers (age 28 ± 11 years, 15 males) underwent exercise stress echo and cardiac MR one week apart assigned randomly to one test first. Stress cardiac MR was performed using an MRI-compatible treadmill; stress echo was performed as per routine protocol. Cardiac MR and echo images were independently reviewed and scored for adequacy of endocardial visualization and confidence in interpretation of the stress study.
RESULTS: Heart rate at the time of imaging was similar between the studies. Average time from cessation of exercise to start of imaging (21 vs. 31 s, P < 0.001) and time to acquire stress images (20 vs. 51 s, P < 0.001) was shorter for cardiac MR. The number of myocardial segments adequately visualized was significantly higher by cardiac MR at rest (99.8% vs. 96.4%, P = 0.002) and stress (99.8% vs. 94.1%, P = 0.001). The proportion of subjects in whom there was high confidence in the interpretation was higher for cardiac MR than echo (96% vs. 60%, P = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: Exercise stress cardiac MR to assess peak exercise wall motion is feasible and can be performed at least as rapidly as stress echo.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes