Literature DB >> 21562060

Applying a patient-specific bio-mathematical model of glioma growth to develop virtual [18F]-FMISO-PET images.

Stanley Gu1, Gargi Chakraborty, Kyle Champley, Adam M Alessio, Jonathan Claridge, Russell Rockne, Mark Muzi, Kenneth A Krohn, Alexander M Spence, Ellsworth C Alvord, Alexander R A Anderson, Paul E Kinahan, Kristin R Swanson.   

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a class of primary brain tumours characterized by their ability to rapidly proliferate and diffusely infiltrate surrounding brain tissue. The aggressive growth of GBM leads to the development of regions of low oxygenation (hypoxia), which can be clinically assessed through [18F]-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Building upon the success of our previous mathematical modelling efforts, we have expanded our model to include the tumour microenvironment, specifically incorporating hypoxia, necrosis and angiogenesis. A pharmacokinetic model for the FMISO-PET tracer is applied at each spatial location throughout the brain and an analytical simulator for the image acquisition and reconstruction methods is applied to the resultant tracer activity map. The combination of our anatomical model with one for FMISO tracer dynamics and PET image reconstruction is able to produce a patient-specific virtual PET image that reproduces the image characteristics of the clinical PET scan as well as shows no statistical difference in the distribution of hypoxia within the tumour. This work establishes proof of principle for a link between anatomical (magnetic resonance image [MRI]) and molecular (PET) imaging on a patient-specific basis as well as address otherwise untenable questions in molecular imaging, such as determining the effect on tracer activity from cellular density. Although further investigation is necessary to establish the predicitve value of this technique, this unique tool provides a better dynamic understanding of the biological connection between anatomical changes seen on MRI and biochemical activity seen on PET of GBM in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21562060      PMCID: PMC4104689          DOI: 10.1093/imammb/dqr002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Math Med Biol        ISSN: 1477-8599            Impact factor:   1.854


  30 in total

1.  MRI simulation-based evaluation of image-processing and classification methods.

Authors:  R K Kwan; A C Evans; G B Pike
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  The influence of growth-induced stress from the surrounding medium on the development of multicell spheroids.

Authors:  C Y Chen; H M Byrne; J R King
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Modeling the early stages of vascular network assembly.

Authors:  Guido Serini; Davide Ambrosi; Enrico Giraudo; Andrea Gamba; Luigi Preziosi; Federico Bussolino
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Models of epidermal wound healing.

Authors:  J A Sherratt; J D Murray
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1990-07-23       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Mathematical modeling of capillary formation and development in tumor angiogenesis: penetration into the stroma.

Authors:  H A Levine; S Pamuk; B D Sleeman; M Nilsen-Hamilton
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Model of competitive binding of vascular endothelial growth factor and placental growth factor to VEGF receptors on endothelial cells.

Authors:  Feilim Mac Gabhann; Aleksander S Popel
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 7.  The WHO classification of tumors of the nervous system.

Authors:  Paul Kleihues; David N Louis; Bernd W Scheithauer; Lucy B Rorke; Guido Reifenberger; Peter C Burger; Webster K Cavenee
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.685

8.  Hypoxia and glucose metabolism in malignant tumors: evaluation by [18F]fluoromisonidazole and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging.

Authors:  Joseph G Rajendran; David A Mankoff; Finbarr O'Sullivan; Lanell M Peterson; David L Schwartz; Ernest U Conrad; Alexander M Spence; Mark Muzi; D Greg Farwell; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Virtual and real brain tumors: using mathematical modeling to quantify glioma growth and invasion.

Authors:  Kristin R Swanson; Carly Bridge; J D Murray; Ellsworth C Alvord
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 3.181

10.  [(18)F]FMISO and [(18)F]FDG PET imaging in soft tissue sarcomas: correlation of hypoxia, metabolism and VEGF expression.

Authors:  J G Rajendran; D C Wilson; E U Conrad; L M Peterson; J D Bruckner; J S Rasey; L K Chin; P D Hofstrand; J R Grierson; J F Eary; K A Krohn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-03-11       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  18 in total

1.  Quantifying the role of angiogenesis in malignant progression of gliomas: in silico modeling integrates imaging and histology.

Authors:  Kristin R Swanson; Russell C Rockne; Jonathan Claridge; Mark A Chaplain; Ellsworth C Alvord; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Integrated Biophysical Modeling and Image Analysis: Application to Neuro-Oncology.

Authors:  Andreas Mang; Spyridon Bakas; Shashank Subramanian; Christos Davatzikos; George Biros
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 9.590

3.  An imaging-based stochastic model for simulation of tumour vasculature.

Authors:  Vikram Adhikarla; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  F-18 fluoromisonidazole for imaging tumor hypoxia: imaging the microenvironment for personalized cancer therapy.

Authors:  Joseph G Rajendran; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 5.  The biology and mathematical modelling of glioma invasion: a review.

Authors:  J C L Alfonso; K Talkenberger; M Seifert; B Klink; A Hawkins-Daarud; K R Swanson; H Hatzikirou; A Deutsch
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Response classification based on a minimal model of glioblastoma growth is prognostic for clinical outcomes and distinguishes progression from pseudoprogression.

Authors:  Maxwell Lewis Neal; Andrew D Trister; Sunyoung Ahn; Anne Baldock; Carly A Bridge; Laura Guyman; Jordan Lange; Rita Sodt; Tyler Cloke; Albert Lai; Timothy F Cloughesy; Maciej M Mrugala; Jason K Rockhill; Russell C Rockne; Kristin R Swanson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Integrating Imaging Data into Predictive Biomathematical and Biophysical Models of Cancer.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  ISRN Biomath       Date:  2012

8.  Modeling Tumor-Associated Edema in Gliomas during Anti-Angiogenic Therapy and Its Impact on Imageable Tumor.

Authors:  Andrea Hawkins-Daarud; Russell C Rockne; Alexander R A Anderson; Kristin R Swanson
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  From patient-specific mathematical neuro-oncology to precision medicine.

Authors:  A L Baldock; R C Rockne; A D Boone; M L Neal; A Hawkins-Daarud; D M Corwin; C A Bridge; L A Guyman; A D Trister; M M Mrugala; J K Rockhill; K R Swanson
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Discriminating survival outcomes in patients with glioblastoma using a simulation-based, patient-specific response metric.

Authors:  Maxwell Lewis Neal; Andrew D Trister; Tyler Cloke; Rita Sodt; Sunyoung Ahn; Anne L Baldock; Carly A Bridge; Albert Lai; Timothy F Cloughesy; Maciej M Mrugala; Jason K Rockhill; Russell C Rockne; Kristin R Swanson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.