Literature DB >> 21561778

Highly conforming polyethylene inlays reduce the in vivo variability of knee joint kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.

Kiriakos Daniilidis1, Adrian Skwara, Volker Vieth, Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann, Walter Heindel, Volker Stückmann, Carsten O Tibesku.   

Abstract

The use of highly conforming polyethylene inlays in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides improved anteroposterior stability. The aim of this fluoroscopic study was to investigate the in vivo kinematics during unloaded and loaded active extension with a highly conforming inlay and a flat inlay after cruciate retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Thirty one patients (50 knees) received a fixed-bearing cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty (Genesis II, Smith & Nephew, Schenefeld, Germany) for primary knee osteoarthritis. Twenty two of them received a flat polyethylene inlay (PE), nine a deep dished PE and 19 were in the control group (physiological knees). The mean age at the time of surgery was 62 years. Dynamic examination with fluoroscopy was performed to assess the "patella tendon angle" in relation to the knee flexion angle (measure of anteroposterior translation) and the "kinematic index" (measure of reproducibility). Fluoroscopy was performed under active extension and flexion, during unloaded movement, and under full weight bearing, simulated by step climbing. No significant difference was observed between both types of polyethylene inlay designs and the physiological knee during unloaded movement. Anteroposterior (AP) instability was found during weight-bearing movement. The deep-dish inlay resulted in lower AP translation and a non-physiological rollback. Neither inlay types could restore physiological kinematics of the knee. Despite the fact that deep dished inlays reduce the AP translation, centralisation of contact pressure results in non-physiological rollback. The influence of kinematic pattern variability on clinical results warrants further investigation.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21561778     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  15 in total

1.  Femoro-tibial kinematics after TKA in fixed- and mobile-bearing knees in the sagittal plane.

Authors:  Kiriakos Daniilidis; Steffen Höll; Georg Gosheger; Ralf Dieckmann; Nicolo Martinelli; Sven Ostermeier; Carsten O Tibesku
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of total knee arthroplasty with highly congruent anterior-stabilized bearings versus a cruciate-retaining design.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Patrick Mulkey; Jill Erickson; Michael B Anderson; Christopher E Pelt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Different intraoperative kinematics with comparable clinical outcomes of ultracongruent and posterior stabilized mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tae Woo Kim; Sang Min Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Sahnghoon Lee; Jak Jang; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Constraints in posterior-stabilised TKA kinematics: a comparison of two generations of an implant.

Authors:  Hemant Pandit; Bernard Hendrik van Duren; M Price; S Tilley; Harinderjit Singh Gill; Neil P Thomas; David W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The role of the deep medial collateral ligament in controlling rotational stability of the knee.

Authors:  Etienne Cavaignac; Karel Carpentier; Regis Pailhé; Thomas Luyckx; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Cruciate retaining and cruciate substituting ultra-congruent insert.

Authors:  Luca Mazzucchelli; Davide Deledda; Federica Rosso; Nicola Ratto; Matteo Bruzzone; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-01

7.  Comparative Analysis of Contemporary Fixed Tibial Inserts: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  John Krumme; Roma Kankaria; Madana Vallem; John Cyrus; Peter Sculco; Gregory Golladay; Niraj Kalore
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-06-27

8.  Posterior-stabilized inserts are preferable to cruciate-substituting ultracongruent inserts due to more favourable kinematics and stability.

Authors:  Ji-Hoon Bae; Jung-Ro Yoon; Ju-Hyoung Sung; Young-Soo Shin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament is not helpful in highly conforming mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Yoon Whan Roh; Jak Jang; Won Chul Choi; Joon Kyu Lee; Sae Hyung Chun; Sahnghoon Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Comparing patient reported outcomes in depuy sigma curved versus curved plus polyethylene inserts in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryan O'Donnell; Kelsey Brown; Van Krueger; Jillian Glasser; Valentin Antoci
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.