INTRODUCTION: Preoperative chemotherapy (PC) for operable breast cancer has shown significant benefits in prospective trials. Many patients are treated in the community setting and some may question the applicability of PC outside the university setting. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of stage II and IIIA breast cancer patients treated from January 2002 to July 2009. Fifty-three of 57 patients who underwent PC were matched based on age, tumor size, and hormone receptor status with 53 patients who did not undergo PC. Differences in patient compliance with physician recommendations for all types of adjuvant therapy were evaluated. Crude odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios derived from conditional logistic regression models were calculated. RESULTS: There were 106 patients included. Patient compliance with chemotherapy was better in the PC group than in the adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) group (100% versus 70%; p = .0001). Similarly, more patients in the PC group completed radiation therapy (96% versus 65%; p = .0003) and initiated hormonal therapy (100% versus 62%; p = .0001). Conditional logistic regression revealed that higher pathologic stage and current cigarette smoking were associated with poorer compliance with chemotherapy. For radiation therapy, the univariate model revealed that compliance with chemotherapy and being employed were associated with completion of radiation, whereas current cigarette smoking and larger pathologic size were associated with poorer compliance with radiation. For hormonal therapy, current cigarette smokers were more likely to be noncompliant with initiation of hormonal therapy. CONCLUSIONS: PC for operable breast cancer can improve patient compliance with chemotherapy. Current cigarette smokers were more likely to be noncompliant with all types of adjuvant therapy.
INTRODUCTION: Preoperative chemotherapy (PC) for operable breast cancer has shown significant benefits in prospective trials. Many patients are treated in the community setting and some may question the applicability of PC outside the university setting. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of stage II and IIIAbreast cancerpatients treated from January 2002 to July 2009. Fifty-three of 57 patients who underwent PC were matched based on age, tumor size, and hormone receptor status with 53 patients who did not undergo PC. Differences in patient compliance with physician recommendations for all types of adjuvant therapy were evaluated. Crude odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios derived from conditional logistic regression models were calculated. RESULTS: There were 106 patients included. Patient compliance with chemotherapy was better in the PC group than in the adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) group (100% versus 70%; p = .0001). Similarly, more patients in the PC group completed radiation therapy (96% versus 65%; p = .0003) and initiated hormonal therapy (100% versus 62%; p = .0001). Conditional logistic regression revealed that higher pathologic stage and current cigarette smoking were associated with poorer compliance with chemotherapy. For radiation therapy, the univariate model revealed that compliance with chemotherapy and being employed were associated with completion of radiation, whereas current cigarette smoking and larger pathologic size were associated with poorer compliance with radiation. For hormonal therapy, current cigarette smokers were more likely to be noncompliant with initiation of hormonal therapy. CONCLUSIONS:PC for operable breast cancer can improve patient compliance with chemotherapy. Current cigarette smokers were more likely to be noncompliant with all types of adjuvant therapy.
Authors: Ian K Komenaka; Robert E Pennington; Bryan P Schneider; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Laura E Norton; Susan E Clare; Noelia M Zork; Robert J Goulet Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Soonmyung Paik; Gong Tang; Steven Shak; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Wanseop Kim; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Drew Watson; John Bryant; Joseph P Costantino; Charles E Geyer; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ian K Komenaka; Maria Elena Martinez; Robert E Pennington; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Susan E Clare; Patricia A Thompson; Colleen Murphy; Noelia M Zork; Robert J Goulet Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Judy C Boughey; Florentia Peintinger; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Allison C Perry; Kelly K Hunt; Gildy V Babiera; S E Singletary; Isabelle Bedrosian; Anthony Lucci; Aman U Buzdar; Lajos Pusztai; Henry M Kuerer Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Kathy S Albain; William E Barlow; Steven Shak; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Robert B Livingston; I-Tien Yeh; Peter Ravdin; Roberto Bugarini; Frederick L Baehner; Nancy E Davidson; George W Sledge; Eric P Winer; Clifford Hudis; James N Ingle; Edith A Perez; Kathleen I Pritchard; Lois Shepherd; Julie R Gralow; Carl Yoshizawa; D Craig Allred; C Kent Osborne; Daniel F Hayes Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Yiing Lin; Shin Lin; Mark Watson; Kathryn M Trinkaus; Sacha Kuo; Michael J Naughton; Katherine Weilbaecher; Timothy P Fleming; Rebecca L Aft Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2009-12-06 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Erica N Peters; Essie Torres; Benjamin A Toll; K Michael Cummings; Ellen R Gritz; Andrew Hyland; Roy S Herbst; James R Marshall; Graham W Warren Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-06-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nelson A Morales; Michelle A Romano; K Michael Cummings; James R Marshall; Andrew J Hyland; Alan Hutson; Graham W Warren Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Vivek Roy; Barbara A Pockaj; Jacob B Allred; Heidi Apsey; Donald W Northfelt; Daniel Nikcevich; Bassam Mattar; Edith A Perez Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.339