PURPOSE: Women with breast cancer do not consistently receive adjuvant treatments that have been shown to increase survival. Acquiring an understanding of the reasons for these lost opportunities may inform strategies for quality improvement. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with surgeons treating 119 women who did not receive guideline-recommended adjuvant therapy to ascertain reasons underlying treatment omission. Primary reason for underuse was categorized as not recommended, recommended but declined, or system failure (treatment recommended, not refused but did not ensue). Logistic regression identified patient characteristics, and surgeons' practice and referral patterns associated with underuse. RESULTS: Surgeons did not recommend adjuvant treatment for 41 (34%) of 119 women, most often because perceived risks exceeded benefits (37 of 119; 31%); unawareness of treatment benefits was rare (four of 119; 3%). Among the 78 (66%) of 119 for whom surgeons recommended treatment, 37 (31%) declined therapy; 41 (34%) system failures occurred. System failures occurred more commonly among minority than white women (73% v 54%; P < .01), and more commonly in women who were receiving Medicaid or were uninsured than those with Medicare or commercial insurance (54% v 19%; P < .01). Women treated by a surgeon who works closely with oncologists were less likely to experience a system failure (84% v 68%; P < .05). CONCLUSION: One third of underuse episodes were attributable to surgeons' perceptions that treatment was not indicated, one third because women did not accept recommendations, and one third were the result of system failures. Reasons for underuse of adjuvant breast cancer treatments appear multifactorial and this heterogeneity suggests the need for simultaneous development of different strategies to improve care.
PURPOSE:Women with breast cancer do not consistently receive adjuvant treatments that have been shown to increase survival. Acquiring an understanding of the reasons for these lost opportunities may inform strategies for quality improvement. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with surgeons treating 119 women who did not receive guideline-recommended adjuvant therapy to ascertain reasons underlying treatment omission. Primary reason for underuse was categorized as not recommended, recommended but declined, or system failure (treatment recommended, not refused but did not ensue). Logistic regression identified patient characteristics, and surgeons' practice and referral patterns associated with underuse. RESULTS: Surgeons did not recommend adjuvant treatment for 41 (34%) of 119 women, most often because perceived risks exceeded benefits (37 of 119; 31%); unawareness of treatment benefits was rare (four of 119; 3%). Among the 78 (66%) of 119 for whom surgeons recommended treatment, 37 (31%) declined therapy; 41 (34%) system failures occurred. System failures occurred more commonly among minority than white women (73% v 54%; P < .01), and more commonly in women who were receiving Medicaid or were uninsured than those with Medicare or commercial insurance (54% v 19%; P < .01). Women treated by a surgeon who works closely with oncologists were less likely to experience a system failure (84% v 68%; P < .05). CONCLUSION: One third of underuse episodes were attributable to surgeons' perceptions that treatment was not indicated, one third because women did not accept recommendations, and one third were the result of system failures. Reasons for underuse of adjuvant breast cancer treatments appear multifactorial and this heterogeneity suggests the need for simultaneous development of different strategies to improve care.
Authors: Mara A Schonberg; Robyn L Birdwell; Brittany L Bychkovsky; Lindsay Hintz; Valerie Fein-Zachary; Michael D Wertheimer; Rebecca A Silliman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Nina A Bickell; Andrea N Geduld; Kathie-Ann Joseph; Joseph A Sparano; M Margaret Kemeny; Soji Oluwole; Tehillah Menes; Anitha Srinivasan; Rebeca Franco; Kezhen Fei; Howard Leventhal Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Kevin M Gorey; Isaac N Luginaah; Kendra L Schwartz; Karen Y Fung; Madhan Balagurusamy; Emma Bartfay; Frances C Wright; Uzoamaka Anucha; Renee R Parsons Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2008-03-11 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Jennifer S Haas; Kathryn A Phillips; Su-Ying Liang; Michael J Hassett; Carol Keohane; Elena B Elkin; Joanne Armstrong; Michele Toscano Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Julia R Trosman; Ruth C Carlos; Melissa A Simon; Debra L Madden; William J Gradishar; Al B Benson; Bruce D Rapkin; Elisa S Weiss; Ilana F Gareen; Lynne I Wagner; Seema A Khan; Mikele M Bunce; Art Small; Christine B Weldon Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Grace L Smith; Ya-Chen T Shih; Ying Xu; Sharon H Giordano; Benjamin D Smith; George H Perkins; Welela Tereffe; Wendy A Woodward; Thomas A Buchholz Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860