Literature DB >> 21556234

Angio-Seal™ Evolution™ versus Manual Compression for Common Femoral Artery Puncture in Neurovascular Diagnostic Angiography : A Prospective, Non-Randomized Study.

Joonho Chung1, Dong Woo Lee, Ok Sim Kwon, Bum-Soo Kim, Yong Sam Shin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This prospective, non-randomized study compared the safety and efficacy of the Angio-Seal™ Evolution™ to that of manual compression for common femoral artery punctures in neurovascular diagnostic angiography.
METHODS: From June 2009 to September 2009, we performed 169 diagnostic trans-femoral cerebral angiographies, using either the Angio-Seal™ Evolution™ or manual compression to achieve hemostasis. We included 60 patients in this study, 30 in each group. We defined minor complications as those requiring no further treatment such as hematoma size less than 6 cm and bruise size less than 25 cm. Major complications were those requiring surgery of the femoral artery pseudoaneurysm and/or the second line increase of hospital stay even without further treatment.
RESULTS: Mean time to hemostasis was 0.42±0.04 minutes for the angioseal and 15.83±1.63 minutes for manual compression (p<0.001). Overall complication rate did not differ between the 2 groups. After the patients were fully mobile, at 24 hours, the rate of onset of new complication differed significantly between the 2 groups (p=0.032). In the angioseal group, 5 (16.7%) of the 30 patients experienced the onset of a new complication after 24 hours, including 3 (60.0%) of the 5 who experienced major complications.
CONCLUSION: The Angio-Seal™ Evolution™ is effective at decreasing mean time to hemostasis, like other closing devices. However, it may not be effective at producing early ambulation and discharge, compared to manual compression, because delayed complications may occur significantly after 24 hours.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angio-Seal; Cerebral angiography; Closure device; Mannual compression

Year:  2011        PMID: 21556234      PMCID: PMC3085810          DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2011.49.3.153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc        ISSN: 1225-8245


  16 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous arterial closure devices.

Authors:  Eric K Hoffer; Robert D Bloch
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Angioseal versus manual compression for haemostasis following peripheral vascular diagnostic and interventional procedures--a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S S Upponi; A G Ganeshan; D R Warakaulle; J Phillips-Hughes; P Boardman; R Uberoi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Clinical experience with a circumferential clip-based vascular closure device in diagnostic catheterization.

Authors:  James Hermiller; Charles Simonton; Tom Hinohara; Daniel Lee; Louis Cannon; Michael Mooney; Charles O'Shaughnessy; Harold Carlson; Richard Fortuna; Carol Anne Yarbrough; Michael Zapien; Tony Chou
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.022

4.  Classifying complications of interventional procedures: a survey of practicing radiologists.

Authors:  C J Leoni; J E Potter; M P Rosen; D P Brophy; E V Lang
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Surgical complications from hemostatic puncture closure devices.

Authors:  J F Eidt; S Habibipour; J F Saucedo; J McKee; F Southern; G W Barone; J D Talley; M Moursi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Ambulation 1 hour after diagnostic cardiac catheterization: a prospective study of 1009 procedures.

Authors:  Brendan J Doyle; Brent A Konz; Ryan J Lennon; John F Bresnahan; Charanjit S Rihal; Henry H Ting
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Early ambulation after diagnostic heart catheterization.

Authors:  Bilal Boztosun; Yilmaz Günes; Ahmet Yildiz; Mustafa Bulut; Mustafa Saglam; Ramazan Kargin; Cevat Kirma
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 8.  Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Koreny; Eva Riedmüller; Mariam Nikfardjam; Peter Siostrzonek; Marcus Müllner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Outpatient vascular intervention: a two-year experience.

Authors:  Sumaira Macdonald; Steven M Thomas; Trevor J Cleveland; Peter A Gaines
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 10.  Complications of arterial closure devices.

Authors:  Mary Beth Lewis-Carey; Stephen T Kee
Journal:  Tech Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.