Amy L Doherty1, Alex R Bowers, Gang Luo, Eli Peli. 1. Schepens Eye Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, 20 Staniford St, Boston, MA 02114-2500, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of the fellow eye to detect stimuli in the area corresponding to the ring scotoma (blind area) of a monocular bioptic telescope in simple conditions (conventional perimetry) and in more visually demanding conditions. METHODS: A computerized dichoptic perimeter enabled separate stimuli to be presented to each eye of 7 bioptic users and 7 nonusers. The bioptic ring scotoma was mapped by presenting the stimulus to the telescope eye only. Detection tests were then conducted under binocular viewing, with stimuli presented only to the fellow eye in a 2 × 2 × 2 design with or without telescope, on plain gray or patterned (spatial noise) background, and with passive (looking at cross) or active (reading letters) fixation task. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted in fellow-eye detection with (86%) and without (87%) a bioptic. The detection rate was significantly reduced on the patterned background and in the active fixation task. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate fellow-eye detection in the area of the ring scotoma with a monocular bioptic telescope under more realistic and visually demanding conditions than conventional perimetry. These results should ease the concern that the monocular ring scotoma might cause blindness to traffic outside the field of the telescope.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of the fellow eye to detect stimuli in the area corresponding to the ring scotoma (blind area) of a monocular bioptic telescope in simple conditions (conventional perimetry) and in more visually demanding conditions. METHODS: A computerized dichoptic perimeter enabled separate stimuli to be presented to each eye of 7 bioptic users and 7 nonusers. The bioptic ring scotoma was mapped by presenting the stimulus to the telescope eye only. Detection tests were then conducted under binocular viewing, with stimuli presented only to the fellow eye in a 2 × 2 × 2 design with or without telescope, on plain gray or patterned (spatial noise) background, and with passive (looking at cross) or active (reading letters) fixation task. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted in fellow-eye detection with (86%) and without (87%) a bioptic. The detection rate was significantly reduced on the patterned background and in the active fixation task. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate fellow-eye detection in the area of the ring scotoma with a monocular bioptic telescope under more realistic and visually demanding conditions than conventional perimetry. These results should ease the concern that the monocular ring scotoma might cause blindness to traffic outside the field of the telescope.
Authors: Alex R Bowers; P Matthew Bronstad; Lauren P Spano; Bidisha Huq; Xiaolan Tang; Amy Doherty; Eli Peli; Gang Luo Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Xiaolan Tang; P Matthew Bronstad; Amy L Doherty; Mojtaba Moharrer; Eli Peli; Gang Luo; Alex R Bowers Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Shuhang Wang; Mojtaba Moharrer; Vilte Baliutaviciute; Bradley E Dougherty; Walter Cybis; Alex R Bowers; Gang Luo Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 3.048