OBJECTIVE: Research suggests that positive psychological well-being is associated with cardiovascular health. However, much of this research uses elderly samples and has not determined the pathways by which psychological well-being influences cardiovascular disease or whether effects are similar for men and women. This study investigates the association between two aspects of well-being (emotional vitality and optimism) and coronary heart disease (CHD) in a sample of middle-aged men and women, and considers potential mediating factors. METHOD: Between 1991 and 1994, well-being and coronary risk factors were assessed among 7,942 individuals without a prior cardiovascular event from the Whitehall II cohort. Incident CHD (fatal CHD, first nonfatal myocardial infarction, or first definite angina) was tracked during 5 person-years of follow-up. RESULTS: Positive psychological well-being was associated with reduced risk of CHD with an apparent threshold effect. Relative to people with the lowest levels of well-being, those with the highest levels had minimally adjusted hazard ratios of 0.74, 95% confidence interval [0.55, 0.98] for emotional vitality and 0.73, 95% confidence interval [0.54, 0.99] for optimism. Moreover, the association was strong for both genders and was only weakly attenuated when accounting for ill-being. Neither health-related behaviors nor biological factors explained these associations. CONCLUSIONS: Positive psychological well-being was associated with a modest, but consistent reduced risk of incident CHD. The relationship was comparable for men and women, and was maintained after controlling for cardiovascular risk factors and ill-being. Additional research is needed to identify underlying mechanisms and investigate whether interventions to increase well-being may enhance cardiovascular health. (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: Research suggests that positive psychological well-being is associated with cardiovascular health. However, much of this research uses elderly samples and has not determined the pathways by which psychological well-being influences cardiovascular disease or whether effects are similar for men and women. This study investigates the association between two aspects of well-being (emotional vitality and optimism) and coronary heart disease (CHD) in a sample of middle-aged men and women, and considers potential mediating factors. METHOD: Between 1991 and 1994, well-being and coronary risk factors were assessed among 7,942 individuals without a prior cardiovascular event from the Whitehall II cohort. Incident CHD (fatal CHD, first nonfatal myocardial infarction, or first definite angina) was tracked during 5 person-years of follow-up. RESULTS: Positive psychological well-being was associated with reduced risk of CHD with an apparent threshold effect. Relative to people with the lowest levels of well-being, those with the highest levels had minimally adjusted hazard ratios of 0.74, 95% confidence interval [0.55, 0.98] for emotional vitality and 0.73, 95% confidence interval [0.54, 0.99] for optimism. Moreover, the association was strong for both genders and was only weakly attenuated when accounting for ill-being. Neither health-related behaviors nor biological factors explained these associations. CONCLUSIONS: Positive psychological well-being was associated with a modest, but consistent reduced risk of incident CHD. The relationship was comparable for men and women, and was maintained after controlling for cardiovascular risk factors and ill-being. Additional research is needed to identify underlying mechanisms and investigate whether interventions to increase well-being may enhance cardiovascular health. (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved.
Authors: Lisa F Berkman; James Blumenthal; Matthew Burg; Robert M Carney; Diane Catellier; Marie J Cowan; Susan M Czajkowski; Robert DeBusk; James Hosking; Allan Jaffe; Peter G Kaufmann; Pamela Mitchell; James Norman; Lynda H Powell; James M Raczynski; Neil Schneiderman Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-06-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Salim Yusuf; Steven Hawken; Stephanie Ounpuu; Tony Dans; Alvaro Avezum; Fernando Lanas; Matthew McQueen; Andrzej Budaj; Prem Pais; John Varigos; Liu Lisheng Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Sep 11-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M G Marmot; G D Smith; S Stansfeld; C Patel; F North; J Head; I White; E Brunner; A Feeney Journal: Lancet Date: 1991-06-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Paul A Schulte; Rebecca J Guerin; Anita L Schill; Anasua Bhattacharya; Thomas R Cunningham; Sudha P Pandalai; Donald Eggerth; Carol M Stephenson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Nansook Park; Christopher Peterson; Daniel Szvarca; Randy J Vander Molen; Eric S Kim; Kevin Collon Journal: Am J Lifestyle Med Date: 2014-09-26
Authors: Juhua Luo; JoAnn E Manson; Julie C Weitlauf; Aladdin H Shadyab; Stephen R Rapp; Lorena Garcia; Junmei Miao Jonasson; Hilary A Tindle; Rami Nassir; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Michael Hendryx Journal: Menopause Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Gholam Reza Nikrahan; Laura Suarez; Karim Asgari; Scott R Beach; Christopher M Celano; Mehrdad Kalantari; Mohammad Reza Abedi; Ali Etesampour; Rezaei Abbas; Jeff C Huffman Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 2.386