Karina W Davidson1, Elizabeth Mostofsky, William Whang. 1. Department of Medicine, Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, PH9 Room 948, New York, NY 10032, USA. kd2124@columbia.edu
Abstract
AIMS: Positive affect is believed to predict cardiovascular health independent of negative affect. We examined whether higher levels of positive affect are associated with a lower risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in a large prospective study with 10 years of follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the association between positive affect and cardiovascular events in 1739 adults (862 men and 877 women) in the 1995 Nova Scotia Health Survey. Trained nurses conducted Type A Structured Interviews, and coders rated the degree of outwardly displayed positive affect on a five-point scale. To test that positive affect predicts incident CHD when controlling for depressive symptoms and other negative affects, we used as covariates: Center for Epidemiological Studies Depressive symptoms Scale, the Cook Medley Hostility scale, and the Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory. There were 145 (8.3%) acute non-fatal or fatal ischaemic heart disease events during the 14 916 person-years of observation. In a proportional hazards model controlling for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors, positive affect predicted CHD (adjusted HR, 0.78; 95% CI 0.63-0.96 per point; P = 0.02), the covariate depressive symptoms continued to predict CHD as had been published previously in the same patients (HR, 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.07 per point; P = 0.004) and hostility and anxiety did not (both P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this large, population-based study, increased positive affect was protective against 10-year incident CHD, suggesting that preventive strategies may be enhanced not only by reducing depressive symptoms but also by increasing positive affect.
AIMS: Positive affect is believed to predict cardiovascular health independent of negative affect. We examined whether higher levels of positive affect are associated with a lower risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in a large prospective study with 10 years of follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the association between positive affect and cardiovascular events in 1739 adults (862 men and 877 women) in the 1995 Nova Scotia Health Survey. Trained nurses conducted Type A Structured Interviews, and coders rated the degree of outwardly displayed positive affect on a five-point scale. To test that positive affect predicts incident CHD when controlling for depressive symptoms and other negative affects, we used as covariates: Center for Epidemiological Studies Depressive symptoms Scale, the Cook Medley Hostility scale, and the Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory. There were 145 (8.3%) acute non-fatal or fatal ischaemic heart disease events during the 14 916 person-years of observation. In a proportional hazards model controlling for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors, positive affect predicted CHD (adjusted HR, 0.78; 95% CI 0.63-0.96 per point; P = 0.02), the covariate depressive symptoms continued to predict CHD as had been published previously in the same patients (HR, 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.07 per point; P = 0.004) and hostility and anxiety did not (both P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this large, population-based study, increased positive affect was protective against 10-year incident CHD, suggesting that preventive strategies may be enhanced not only by reducing depressive symptoms but also by increasing positive affect.
Authors: Lijing L Yan; Kiang Liu; Karen A Matthews; Martha L Daviglus; T Freeman Ferguson; Catarina I Kiefe Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-10-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Usha S Govindarajulu; Donna Spiegelman; Sally W Thurston; Bhaswati Ganguli; Ellen A Eisen Journal: Stat Med Date: 2007-09-10 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Mary E Charlson; Carla Boutin-Foster; Carol A Mancuso; Janey C Peterson; Gbenga Ogedegbe; William M Briggs; Laura Robbins; Alice M Isen; John P Allegrante Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2007-03-12 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: David R Strong; Christopher W Kahler; Adam M Leventhal; Ana M Abrantes; Elizabeth Lloyd-Richardson; Raymond Niaura; Richard A Brown Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-07-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Karina W Davidson; Joseph E Schwartz; Susan A Kirkland; Elizabeth Mostofsky; Daniel Fink; Duane Guernsey; Daichi Shimbo Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2009-01-24 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Julia K Boehm; Jackie Soo; Ying Chen; Emily S Zevon; Rosalba Hernandez; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Laura D Kubzansky Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Christopher M Celano; Eleanor E Beale; Shannon V Moore; Deborah J Wexler; Jeff C Huffman Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.810
Authors: Sonsoles Fuentes; Usama Bilal; Iñaki Galán; Joan R Villalbí; Albert Espelt; Marina Bosque-Prous; Manuel Franco; Mariana Lazo Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Jesse C Stewart; Misty A W Hawkins; Tasneem Khambaty; Anthony J Perkins; Christopher M Callahan Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 4.312