Literature DB >> 21553171

Infection control rate of irrigation and débridement for periprosthetic joint infection.

Loukas Koyonos1, Benjamin Zmistowski, Craig J Della Valle, Javad Parvizi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Irrigation and débridement with retention of prosthesis is commonly performed for periprosthetic joint infection. Infection control is reportedly dependent on timing of irrigation and débridement relative to the index procedure. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore (1) compared the ability of irrigation and débridement to control acute postoperative, acute delayed, and chronic infections and (2) determined whether any patient-related factors influenced infection control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 136 patients (138 joints) from two institutional databases treated with irrigation and débridement between 1996 and 2007. Mean age at time of treatment was 64 years (range, 18-89 years); 77 (56%) joints were in women. Three subgroups were extracted: acute postoperative infections, occurring within 4 weeks (52 joints), acute delayed infections occurring after 4 weeks with acute onset of symptoms (50 joints), and chronic infections (36 joints). Minimum followup was 12 months (average, 54 months; range, 12-115 months). Failure to control infection was reported as the need for any subsequent surgical intervention and/or use of long-term suppressive antibiotics.
RESULTS: Infection control was not achieved in 90 joints (65%; 82 requiring return to surgery and eight remaining on long-term suppressive antibiotics). Failure rates were 69% (36 of 52), 56% (28 of 50), and 72% (26 of 36) for acute postoperative, acute delayed, and chronic infections, respectively. Of the 10 variables considered as potential risk factors, only Staphylococcal organisms predicted failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Irrigation and débridement is unlikely to control periprosthetic joint infection, including acute infections. Our data suggest surgeons should be cautious using this procedure as a routine means to address periprosthetic joint infection. For most patients, we recommend irrigation and débridement be reserved for an immunologically optimized host infected acutely with a non-Staphylococcal organism. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21553171      PMCID: PMC3183205          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1910-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  30 in total

1.  Two-stage reconstruction of a total hip arthroplasty because of infection.

Authors:  D J McDonald; R H Fitzgerald; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Hematogenous infection of total knee implants.

Authors:  L Marmor; D Berkus
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Infection after total knee arthroplasty. A retrospective study of the treatment of eighty-one infections.

Authors:  H Segawa; D T Tsukayama; R F Kyle; D A Becker; R B Gustilo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Irrigation and debridement in the management of prosthetic joint infection: traditional indications revisited.

Authors:  Khalid A Azzam; Mark Seeley; Elie Ghanem; Matthew S Austin; James J Purtill; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Limited success with open debridement and retention of components in the treatment of acute Staphylococcus aureus infections after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Carl Deirmengian; Jordan Greenbaum; Paul A Lotke; Robert E Booth; Jess H Lonner
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Infection after total joint arthroplasty from distal extremity sepsis.

Authors:  B J Thomas; J R Moreland; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Deep sepsis following total knee arthroplasty. Ten-year experience at the University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center.

Authors:  T J Grogan; F Dorey; J Rollins; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Hematogenous infection after knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Bengtson; G Blomgren; K Knutson; A Wigren; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1987-10

10.  Hematogenous infection of total joint implants: a report of multiple joint infections in three patients.

Authors:  A Wigren; G Karlstrom; H Kaufer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  53 in total

1.  Failure of irrigation and débridement for early postoperative periprosthetic infection.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring; Susan M Odum; Keith R Berend; William A Jiranek; Javad Parvizi; Kevin J Bozic; Craig J Della Valle; Terence J Gioe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  What is the Long-term Economic Societal Effect of Periprosthetic Infections After THA? A Markov Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Parisi; Joseph F Konopka; Hany S Bedair
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  CORR Insights®: What is the Long-term Economic Societal Effect of Periprosthetic Infections After THA? A Markov Analysis.

Authors:  Don C Beringer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Swab cultures are not as effective as tissue cultures for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Vinay K Aggarwal; Carlos Higuera; Gregory Deirmengian; Javad Parvizi; Matthew S Austin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection does not preclude infection control.

Authors:  Ronald Huang; Chi-Chien Hu; Bahar Adeli; Javad Mortazavi; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Irrigation and debridement for periprosthetic infections of the hip and factors determining outcome.

Authors:  Georgios K Triantafyllopoulos; Lazaros A Poultsides; Vasileios I Sakellariou; Wei Zhang; Peter K Sculco; Yan Ma; Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Microorganisms responsible for periprosthetic knee infections in England and Wales.

Authors:  Richard J Holleyman; Paul Baker; Andre Charlett; Kate Gould; David J Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Treatment of acute periprosthetic infections with prosthesis retention: Review of current concepts.

Authors:  Jesse Wp Kuiper; Robin Tjeenk Willink; Dirk Jan F Moojen; Michel Pj van den Bekerom; Sascha Colen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18

9.  Prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Saima Aslam; Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 10.  Functional outcomes of acutely infected knee arthroplasty: a comparison of different surgical treatment options.

Authors:  Ivan Dzaja; James Howard; Lyndsay Somerville; Brent Lanting
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.