Literature DB >> 25405096

Treatment of acute periprosthetic infections with prosthesis retention: Review of current concepts.

Jesse Wp Kuiper1, Robin Tjeenk Willink1, Dirk Jan F Moojen1, Michel Pj van den Bekerom1, Sascha Colen1.   

Abstract

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication after total joint arthroplasty, occurring in approximately 1%-2% of all cases. With growing populations and increasing age, PJI will have a growing effect on health care costs. Many risk factors have been identified that increase the risk of developing PJI, including obesity, immune system deficiencies, malignancy, previous surgery of the same joint and longer operating time. Acute PJI occurs either postoperatively (4 wk to 3 mo after initial arthroplasty, depending on the classification system), or via hematogenous spreading after a period in which the prosthesis had functioned properly. Diagnosis and the choice of treatment are the cornerstones to success. Although different definitions for PJI have been used in the past, most are more or less similar and include the presence of a sinus tract, blood infection values, synovial white blood cell count, signs of infection on histopathological analysis and one or more positive culture results. Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is the primary treatment for acute PJI, and should be performed as soon as possible after the development of symptoms. Success rates differ, but most studies report success rates of around 60%-80%. Whether single or multiple debridement procedures are more successful remains unclear. The use of local antibiotics in addition to the administration of systemic antibiotic agents is also subject to debate, and its pro's and con's should be carefully considered. Systemic treatment, based on culture results, is of importance for all PJI treatments. Additionally, rifampin should be given in Staphylococcal PJIs, unless all foreign material is removed. The most important factors contributing to treatment failure are longer duration of symptoms, a longer time after initial arthroplasty, the need for more debridement procedures, the retention of exchangeable components, and PJI caused by Staphylococcus (aureus or coagulase negative). If DAIR treatment is unsuccessful, the following treatment option should be based on the patient health status and his or her expectations. For the best functional outcome, one- or two-stage revision should be performed after DAIR failure. In conclusion, DAIR is the obvious choice for treatment of acute PJI, with good success rates in selected patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute; Arthroplasty; Debridement; Debridement antibiotics and implant retention; Infection; Periprosthetic joint infection; Prosthesis; Retention

Year:  2014        PMID: 25405096      PMCID: PMC4133475          DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthop        ISSN: 2218-5836


  90 in total

1.  Histological and microbiological findings in non-infected and infected revision arthroplasty tissues. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. Oxford Skeletal Infection Research and Intervention Service.

Authors:  R Pandey; A R Berendt; N A Athanasou
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  The Mark Coventry Award: diagnosis of early postoperative TKA infection using synovial fluid analysis.

Authors:  Hany Bedair; Nicholas Ting; Christina Jacovides; Arjun Saxena; Mario Moric; Javad Parvizi; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Procrastination of wound drainage and malnutrition affect the outcome of joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fereidoon M Jaberi; Javad Parvizi; C Thomas Haytmanek; Ashish Joshi; James Purtill
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Irrigation and debridement for periprosthetic infections: does the organism matter?

Authors:  Susan M Odum; Thomas K Fehring; Adolph V Lombardi; Ben M Zmistowski; Nicholas M Brown; Jeffrey T Luna; Keith A Fehring; Erik N Hansen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Higher body mass index leads to longer operative time in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Barthelemy Liabaud; David A Patrick; Jeffrey A Geller
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  A two-stage retention débridement protocol for acute periprosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Chris S Estes; Chris P Beauchamp; Henry D Clarke; Mark J Spangehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Management of infection associated with total hip arthroplasty according to a treatment algorithm.

Authors:  S G Giulieri; P Graber; P E Ochsner; W Zimmerli
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  Treatment of acutely infected arthroplasty with local antibiotics.

Authors:  K Davenport; S Traina; C Perry
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Prosthesis retention, serial debridement, and antibiotic bead use for the treatment of infection following total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Scott M Tintle; Jonathan A Forsberg; Benjamin K Potter; Richard B Islinger; Romney C Andersen
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.390

10.  Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties: comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeppe Lange; Anders Troelsen; Reimar W Thomsen; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.790

View more
  24 in total

1.  What is the Long-term Economic Societal Effect of Periprosthetic Infections After THA? A Markov Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Parisi; Joseph F Konopka; Hany S Bedair
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  One-stage versus two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Navraj S Nagra; Thomas W Hamilton; Sameer Ganatra; David W Murray; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Two-stage revision surgery for infected total knee replacements: reasonable function and high success rate with the use of primary knee replacement implants as temporary spacers.

Authors:  Ben Arthur Marson; Samuel T Walters; Benjamin V Bloch; Khosrow Sehat
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-08-05

Review 4.  Management of painful reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anders L Ekelund
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-04-09

5.  Direct Intra-articular Antibiotic Administration for Acute Prosthetic Joint Infection in Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wan Lye Cheong; Yi Xiang Tan; Teck Siong Fong; Mohamed Nazri Mohamed Nazeeb; Tuck Shin Fong
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 6.  Indications and Guidelines for Debridement and Implant Retention for Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection.

Authors:  Douglas A Zaruta; Bowen Qiu; Andrew Y Liu; Benjamin F Ricciardi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

7.  The DAIR (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention) procedure for infected total knee replacement - a literature review.

Authors:  Sultan Naseer Qasim; Andrew Swann; Robert Ashford
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-01-11

8.  Antibiotic Prophylaxis and DAIR Treatment in Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty, A National Survey in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Ewout S Veltman; Dirk Jan F Moojen; Rob Ghh Nelissen; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2018-01-01

9.  Distribution characteristics of Staphylococcus spp. in different phases of periprosthetic joint infection: A review.

Authors:  Geyong Guo; Jiaxing Wang; Yanan You; Jiaqi Tan; Hao Shen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Novel Biomarkers for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection from Synovial Fluid and Serum.

Authors:  Hannes Keemu; Felix Vaura; Anu Maksimow; Mikael Maksimow; Aleksi Jokela; Maija Hollmén; Keijo Mäkelä
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.