Literature DB >> 21552210

Biomarkers and microsatellite instability analysis of curettings can predict the behavior of FIGO stage I endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

Anita Steinbakk1, Anais Malpica, Aida Slewa, Ivar Skaland, Einar Gudlaugsson, Emiel A M Janssen, Kjell Løvslett, Bent Fiane, Arnold Jan Kruse, Weiwei Feng, Yu Yinhua, Jan P Baak.   

Abstract

The prognostic value of molecular biomarkers, microsatellite instability, DNA ploidy and morphometric mean shortest nuclear axis in endometrial cancer is conflicting, possibly due to the fact that different studies have used mixtures of histotypes, FIGO stages and different non-standardized non-automated methods. We have evaluated the prognostic value of classical prognostic factors, molecular biomarkers, microsatellite instability, DNA ploidy and morphometric mean shortest nuclear axis in a population-based cohort of FIGO stage I endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Curettings of 224 FIGO stage I endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma patients were reviewed. Clinical information, including follow-up, was obtained from the patients' charts. Microsatellite instability and morphometric mean shortest nuclear axis were obtained in whole tissue sections and molecular biomarkers using tissue microarrays. DNA ploidy was analyzed by image cytometry. Univariate (Kaplan-Meier method) and multivariate (Cox model) survival analysis was performed. With median follow-up of 66 months (1-209), 14 (6%) patients developed metastases. Age, microsatellite instability, molecular biomarkers (p16, p21, p27, p53 and survivin) and morphometric mean shortest nuclear axis had prognostic value. With multivariate analysis, combined survivin, p21 and microsatellite instability overshadowed all other variables. Patients in which any of these features had favorable values had an excellent prognosis, in contrast to those with either high survivin or low p21 (97 vs 78% survival, P<0.0001, hazard ratio=7.8). Combined high survivin and low p21 values and microsatellite instability high identified a small subgroup with an especially poor prognosis (survival rate 57%, P=0.01, hazard ratio=5.6). We conclude that low p21 and high survivin expression are poor prognosis indicators in FIGO stage I endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma, especially when high microsatellite instability occurs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21552210     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  9 in total

1.  PTEN Expression as a Predictor of Response to Focal Adhesion Kinase Inhibition in Uterine Cancer.

Authors:  Duangmani Thanapprapasr; Rebecca A Previs; Wei Hu; Cristina Ivan; Guillermo N Armaiz-Pena; Piotr L Dorniak; Jean M Hansen; Rajesha Rupaimoole; Jie Huang; Heather J Dalton; Rouba Ali-Fehmi; Robert L Coleman; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 2.  Current status of molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  H M J Werner; H B Salvesen
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Prognostic biomarkers in endometrial and ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Xavier Matias-Guiu; Ben Davidson
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Clinicopathologic Significance of Mismatch Repair Defects in Endometrial Cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  D Scott McMeekin; David L Tritchler; David E Cohn; David G Mutch; Heather A Lankes; Melissa A Geller; Matthew A Powell; Floor J Backes; Lisa M Landrum; Richard Zaino; Russell D Broaddus; Nilsa Ramirez; Feng Gao; Shamshad Ali; Kathleen M Darcy; Michael L Pearl; Paul A DiSilvestro; Shashikant B Lele; Paul J Goodfellow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Revisiting tumour aneuploidy - the place of ploidy assessment in the molecular era.

Authors:  Håvard E Danielsen; Manohar Pradhan; Marco Novelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  DNA ploidy in curettage specimens identifies high-risk patients and lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  T S Njølstad; J Trovik; T S Hveem; M L Kjæreng; W Kildal; M Pradhan; J Marcickiewicz; S Tingulstad; A C Staff; H K Haugland; R Eraker; K Oddenes; J A Rokne; J Tjugum; M S Lode; F Amant; H M Werner; H B Salvesen; H E Danielsen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Imaging in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Silvana C Faria; Tara Sagebiel; Aparna Balachandran; Catherine Devine; Chandana Lal; Priya R Bhosale
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

8.  BIRC5 is a prognostic biomarker associated with tumor immune cell infiltration.

Authors:  Linlong Xu; Wenpeng Yu; Han Xiao; Kang Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Prognostic molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer: A review.

Authors:  J Edgardo Hernández; Ailyn González-Montiel; Jesús C Ceb Allos-Villalva; David Cantú; Salim Barquet; Anny Olivares-Mundo; Luis A Herrera; Diddier Prada
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther (Manch)       Date:  2019-12-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.