Literature DB >> 21549778

Localized ultrasound enhances delivery of rapamycin from microbubbles to prevent smooth muscle proliferation.

Linsey C Phillips1, Alexander L Klibanov, Brian R Wamhoff, John A Hossack.   

Abstract

Microbubble contrast agents have been shown to enhance reagent delivery when activated by ultrasound. We hypothesized that ultrasound would enhance delivery of rapamycin, an antiproliferative agent, from the shell of microbubbles, thus reducing proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Our objective was to determine optimal ultrasound parameters that maximized therapeutic efficacy, maintained cell adherence, and minimized the drug exposure time. In vitro assays determined that ultrasound (1 MHz, 0.5% duty cycle) is required to successfully deliver rapamycin from microbubbles and reduce proliferation. Co-injection of rapamycin with control microbubbles did not result in a reduction in proliferation. Successful reduction in proliferation (>50%) required pulses at least 10 cycles in length and at least 300 kPa peak negative pressure at which point 90% of cells remained adherent. The anti-proliferative effect was also localized within a 6mm wide zone by focusing the ultrasound beam.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21549778      PMCID: PMC3148278          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  42 in total

Review 1.  Local drug and gene delivery through microbubbles.

Authors:  E C Unger; E Hersh; M Vannan; T O Matsunaga; T McCreery
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.194

2.  Reparable sonoporation generated by microstreaming.

Authors:  Junru Wu; Joel P Ross; Jen-Fu Chiu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Solubilization of rapamycin.

Authors:  P Simamora; J M Alvarez; S H Yalkowsky
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 5.875

4.  Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction.

Authors:  J E Chomas; P Dayton; J Allen; K Morgan; K W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Paul A Dayton; John S Allen; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Detection of individual microbubbles of an ultrasound contrast agent: fundamental and pulse inversion imaging.

Authors:  Alexander L Klibanov; Peter T Rasche; Michael S Hughes; Jolette K Wojdyla; Karen P Galen; James H Wible; Gary H Brandenburger
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Acute and chronic tissue response to coronary stent implantation: pathologic findings in human specimen.

Authors:  P H Grewe; T Deneke; A Machraoui; J Barmeyer; K M Müller
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Intravascular ultrasound detection and delivery of molecularly targeted microbubbles for gene delivery.

Authors:  Linsey C Phillips; Alexander L Klibanov; Brian R Wamhoff; John A Hossack
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of sirolimus.

Authors:  K Mahalati; B D Kahan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Ultrasound-mediated transfection of canine myocardium by intravenous administration of cationic microbubble-linked plasmid DNA.

Authors:  Mani Vannan; Thomas McCreery; Peng Li; Zhenguo Han; Evan Unger; Bettina Kuersten; Elizabeth Nabel; Sanjay Rajagopalan
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.251

View more
  14 in total

1.  Lipid microbubbles as a vehicle for targeted drug delivery using focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening.

Authors:  Carlos Sierra; Camilo Acosta; Cherry Chen; Shih-Ying Wu; Maria E Karakatsani; Manuel Bernal; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Reducing Neointima Formation in a Swine Model with IVUS and Sirolimus Microbubbles.

Authors:  Joseph P Kilroy; Ali H Dhanaliwala; Alexander L Klibanov; Douglas K Bowles; Brian R Wamhoff; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Intravascular ultrasound catheter to enhance microbubble-based drug delivery via acoustic radiation force.

Authors:  Joseph P Kilroy; Alexander L Klibanov; Brian R Wamhoff; John A Hossack
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Focused ultrasound-mediated drug delivery from microbubbles reduces drug dose necessary for therapeutic effect on neointima formation--brief report.

Authors:  Linsey C Phillips; Ali H Dhanaliwala; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack; Brian R Wamhoff
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 8.311

5.  Localized in vivo model drug delivery with intravascular ultrasound and microbubbles.

Authors:  Joseph P Kilroy; Alexander L Klibanov; Brian R Wamhoff; Douglas K Bowles; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Encapsulated microbubbles and echogenic liposomes for contrast ultrasound imaging and targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Rahul Nahire; Sanku Mallik; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Comput Mech       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Preliminary observations on the spatial correlation between short-burst microbubble oscillations and vascular bioeffects.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Andrew A Brayman; Andrew P Evan; Thomas J Matula
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Characterization of Bioeffects on Endothelial Cells under Acoustic Droplet Vaporization.

Authors:  Robinson Seda; David S Li; J Brian Fowlkes; Joseph L Bull
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 9.  Current status and prospects for microbubbles in ultrasound theranostics.

Authors:  K Heath Martin; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-03-15

10.  Enhanced intracellular delivery of a model drug using microbubbles produced by a microfluidic device.

Authors:  Adam J Dixon; Ali H Dhanaliwala; Johnny L Chen; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.