Literature DB >> 11523724

Clinical pharmacokinetics of sirolimus.

K Mahalati1, B D Kahan.   

Abstract

Sirolimus (previously known as rapamycin), a macrocyclic lactone, is a potent immunosuppressive agent. Sirolimus was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, on the basis of 2 large, double-blind, prospective clinical trials, for use in kidney transplant recipients at a fixed dosage of 2 or 5 mg/day in addition to full dosages of cyclosporin and prednisone. However, despite the fixed dosage regimens used in these pivotal trials, pharmacokinetic and clinical data show that sirolimus is a critical-dose drug requiring therapeutic drug monitoring to minimise drug-related toxicities and maximise efficacy. Assays using high performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, although cumbersome, are the gold standard for evaluating other commonly used assays, such as liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection, radioreceptor assay and microparticle enzyme immunoassay. Sirolimus is available in oral solution and tablet form. It has poor oral absorption and distributes widely in tissues, displaying not only a wide inter- and intrapatient variability in drug clearance, but also less than optimal correlations between whole blood concentrations and drug dose, demographic features or patient characteristics. Furthermore, the critical role of the cytochrome P450 3A4 system for sirolimus biotransformation leads to extensive drug-drug interactions, among which are increases in cyclosporin concentrations. Thus, sirolimus is now being used to reduce or eliminate exposure to cyclosporin or corticosteroids. The long elimination half-life of sirolimus necessitates a loading dose but allows once daily administration, which is more convenient and thereby could help to improve patient compliance. This review emphasises the importance of blood concentration monitoring in optimising the use of sirolimus. The excellent correlation between steady-state trough concentration (at least 4 days after inception of, or change in, therapy) and area under the concentration-time curve makes the former a simple and reliable index for monitoring sirolimus exposure. Target trough concentration ranges depend on the concomitant immunosuppressive regimen, but a range of 5 to 15 microg/L is appropriate if cyclosporin is being used at trough concentrations of 75 to 150 microg/L. Weekly monitoring is recommended for the first month and bi-weekly for the next month; thereafter,concentration measurements are necessary only if warranted clinically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11523724     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200140080-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  52 in total

1.  The quantification of sirolimus by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and microparticle enzyme immunoassay in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  P Salm; P J Taylor; P I Pillans
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.393

2.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety, tolerance, and preliminary pharmacokinetics of ascending single doses of orally administered sirolimus (rapamycin) in stable renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  E M Johnson; J Zimmerman; K Duderstadt; J Chambers; A L Sorenson; D K Granger; P S Almond; J p Fryer; J R Leventhal; J Scarola; A J Matas; D M Canafax
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Sirolimus reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes despite lower cyclosporine doses in caucasian recipients of mismatched primary renal allografts: a phase II trial. Rapamune Study Group.

Authors:  B D Kahan; B A Julian; M D Pescovitz; Y Vanrenterghem; J Neylan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-11-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in stable renal transplant patients after multiple oral dose administration.

Authors:  J J Zimmerman; B D Kahan
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  Determination of rapamycin in whole blood by HPLC.

Authors:  J O Svensson; C Brattström; J Säwe
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  Radioreceptor assay for sirolimus in patients with decreased platelet counts.

Authors:  N Goodyear; K L Napoli; J N Murthy; B D Kahan; S J Soldin
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.281

7.  Comparison of steady-state trough sirolimus samples by HPLC and a radioreceptor assay.

Authors:  D L Davis; J N Murthy; K L Napoli; B D Kahan; H Gallant-Haidner; R W Yatscoff; S J Soldin
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.281

8.  Distribution of sirolimus in rat tissue.

Authors:  K L Napoli; M E Wang; S M Stepkowski; B D Kahan
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.281

9.  The relationship of blood concentrations of rapamycin and cyclosporine to suppression of allograft rejection in a rabbit heterotopic heart transplant model.

Authors:  J Fryer; R W Yatscoff; E A Pascoe; J Thliveris
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Metabolism and transport of the macrolide immunosuppressant sirolimus in the small intestine.

Authors:  A Lampen; Y Zhang; I Hackbarth; L Z Benet; K F Sewing; U Christians
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  60 in total

1.  The pharmacokinetics of Biolimus A9 after elution from the BioMatrix II stent in patients with coronary artery disease: the Stealth PK Study.

Authors:  Miodrag C Ostojic; Zoran Perisic; Dragan Sagic; Robert Jung; Yan-Ling Zhang; Jamie Bendrick-Peart; Ronald Betts; Uwe Christians
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Population pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in de novo Chinese adult renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Zheng Jiao; Xiao-jin Shi; Zhong-dong Li; Ming-kang Zhong
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part II.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  mTORC2 is required for proliferation and survival of TSC2-null cells.

Authors:  Elena A Goncharova; Dmitry A Goncharov; Hua Li; Wittaya Pimtong; Stephen Lu; Irene Khavin; Vera P Krymskaya
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Everolimus inhibits anti-HLA I antibody-mediated endothelial cell signaling, migration and proliferation more potently than sirolimus.

Authors:  Y-P Jin; N M Valenzuela; M E Ziegler; E Rozengurt; E F Reed
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 7.  Everolimus and sirolimus in transplantation-related but different.

Authors:  Jost Klawitter; Björn Nashan; Uwe Christians
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.250

8.  Effects of immunosuppression on alpha and beta cell renewal in transplanted mouse islets.

Authors:  C Krautz; S Wolk; A Steffen; K-P Knoch; U Ceglarek; J Thiery; S Bornstein; H-D Saeger; M Solimena; S Kersting
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 9.  Differentiating the mTOR inhibitors everolimus and sirolimus in the treatment of tuberous sclerosis complex.

Authors:  Jeffrey P MacKeigan; Darcy A Krueger
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 10.  Nanomedicines in renal transplant rejection--focus on sirolimus.

Authors:  Li-Jiuan Shen; Fe-Lin Lin Wu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.